Email This PagePrint This Page

What Scott Brown's Victory Really Means

21 January 2010

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)


et ready for the bromides.

From the right: Just goes to show the country is against Democratic tax-and-spend. Obama's agenda is in ruins, heath-care is over, the GOP has a good chance of taking back Congress next November. Now, even congessional Democrats will move to the right.

From the left: Just goes to show Obama should never have cozied up to Wall Street, Big Pharma, and Big Insurance. He compromised too much. The Democratic base lost faith in him. The only answer is for Obama and congressional Dems to turn left.

Don't believe any of it. Here's what's really going on. In Massachusetts, in New Jersey, all over the nation, voters are petrified of losing their jobs, their homes, and what's left of their savings. Nothing counts more than the economy. Rightly or wrongly, presidents and the party in power are blamed when the economy is lousy. Voters fired Jimmy Carter in 1980 because the economy went south. They fired George Bush the first in 1992 because the economy was awful. They fired congressional Democrats in 1994 because the economy was still awful. And they're in the process of firing Obama and the Democrats - unless or until the economy turns around.

What happens next November depends both on the extent of joblessness and the direction the economy is moving in. The usual political rule is voters pay more attention to the latter. They'll forgive even relatively high unemployment if they're confident the economy is improving. But that old rule hasn't been tested under conditions of extremely high unemployment. If next November one in five Americans is still unemployed or underemployed or working at lower pay than before the Great Recession, voters may not care that the economy is showing signs of improvement. They'll vote the rascals out.

Yet when it comes to doing more about the jobs crisis, Obama and the Dems are in a box. The only sure-fire way to get jobs back is for them to do more deficit spending. After all, consumers are still in no mood to spend, businesses won't invest without consumers to buy the fruits of such investments, and exports are still in the tank. Government remains the purchaser of last resort. (And for those of you still unconvinced, focus on the ratio of debt to GDP, and know that it won't improve until the denominator of that equation - the GDP - starts growing quickly again, which won't happen until there's sufficient overall demand.)

But now, especially after the debacle in Massachusetts, there aren't likely to be enough votes for more deficit spending. Blue-Dog Democrats will use the election results to argue for "fiscal responsibility" and join Republicans in exhuming Herbert Hoover. Which means no big jobs package. Which means, barring a miracle, continued high unemployment and underemployment. The economy will be doing better in November than it is today - consumers have to replace cars and appliances that have worn out, companies have to replace inventories that have worn thin - but not so much better that voters will breathe easier.

The Republicans won't have easy sailing from here on, either. Brown's victory has given more muscle to the tea-partiers - the rag-tag group of angry no-nothings who are challenging mainstream Republicans in primaries all over the country. Tea partiers have almost as much contempt for the Republican establishment as they do for Democrats. Brown himself is no tea-partier; in fact, his record in Massachusetts is quite moderate. But the partiers will use him nonetheless. And if Republicans move to the right fringe, Democrats have more room to attract moderates and Independents.

What really worries me is a basic fact, borne out by history. Deep and continuing economic stresses bring out demagogues, xenophobes, racists, and opportunists who channel people's fears and anxieties into resentments against other people. If this awful economy goes on much longer, the extreme right could meet the extreme left in a place called "I'm mad as hell and am not gonna take it any more," and form a third party that attracts everyone who feels disempowered and dumped on - and who want to blame someone else for what's happened to them. Then, watch out.


Open Article On Originating Site

Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," and his most recent book, "Supercapitalism." His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

 
0 # FirewindII 2010-01-22 08:07
My dear (KSG) professor, I think that this is the first time I've ever disagreed with you, then or since. I am going to suggest that it was a sleeper issue, it couldn't have been more pocketbook, and it was pivotal.

I am a Democrat, a real one, not one of those "Brown Shirts", as some of them are now calling themselves (?!), who flooded the media with, "I've been a democrat all my life, but..." (...but my values don't agree with anything the Democratic Party stands for etc. etc.) Thousands of them commenting on every blog and Boston Globe article and commentary. Wonder where the "Brown Shirts" (sic, very sic) will show up next. That's what worries me.

No, this election turned on a dime, about 10 days before the election. In fact, so quickly that all the usual polls had Coakley at +15 at exactly the same time that new, obscure ones had it tied. Wow. I flat didn't believe it. (Poster boy for the blog entries by newly-minted Massachusettsan s accusing us of being "delusional".) Afterall, we've seen polls be massively off, even recently. And pollsters are part of campaigns. But that was until I talked with an electrical worker friend (I'm not in a union) who was manning the phones to get out the vote. Neither he nor I had paid attention to the report that had come out right before then, saying the the unions were among those covered by the "cadillac health insurance plans" that would be taxed. Oops.

Well, the people he was calling didn't miss that, and they told him that the election had become a pocketbook issue. Health insurance is gawdawfully expensive, no matter what a family has to pay, nowadays, and they were not up for paying more. Health reform had to be stopped if it were going to do that. Now. The air went out of the balloon. There went a Democratic core constituency, especially in Massachusetts. (They didn't know or care about the quickly cobbled adjustment that was made in the negotiations in the days after the anomaly was identified.)

Now, to Mr. Brown. I predict, though it sticks painfully in my craw, that he is going very far. He checks all the boxes for the republican party. And he's rocketed onto the national scene without a background other than the Fox - er faux - pedigree that the republicans love: Star power. Posing nude in Cosmopolitan. Wife a newscaster. Daughter an American Idol. Handsome. An empty suit. Even drives an American pickup truck. Think Ronald Reagan, Arnold Schwartzeneggar , Sonny Bono, the guy from Love Boat. Yes, the republicans, who love to bash the strawman "Hollywood". He likely won't leapfrog the first string, but he does give them a way out from their most recent production-value darling, should they need it, and they will.

Yup, look no further.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # kazak 2010-01-22 08:07
Maybe the answer is for you to do it yourself.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # FirewindII 2010-01-23 09:41
I am a little surprised that, coincidentally, NPR's Morning Edition has a story on exactly this right now, following an apocryphal at&t employee. "Unions see it as lose-lose," was the last line.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # RM00011 2010-01-23 09:53
Reich says, "Here's what's really going on. In Massachusetts, in New Jersey, all over the nation, voters are petrified of losing their jobs, their homes, and what's left of their savings. Nothing counts more than the economy. Rightly or wrongly, presidents and the party in power are blamed when the economy is lousy."

If this were the case, why would the vote for a republican? That could only be if they were unbelievably stupid. The republican party solution for the economic crisis is less regulation of capital. That will mean more capital flight, more temp jobs, lower wages, more costly wars -- all the things that drive voters' fears. The Democrats at least support workers in some small ways. If voters don't know that, then they are hopelessly stupid. And that is exactly what happened in Mass. This was a Teabaggers revolt. The same forces put G.W. Bush in office. Don't underestimate the stupidity of American voters and their readiness to vote against their own interests and well-being. We may be in for a lot more of this, as the people (like myself) who voted for Obama just turn away as he becomes more and more neo-conservative and as he feels it more necessary to appease the republicans.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # kellyannvarbel 2010-01-23 09:54
Obama is bogged down (and thus so is Congress/the American people) - way bogged down - by the American War Machine and the Greedy Banks that are parasites living off the blood, sweat and tears of the American People. Obama has been stymied because of this. And for some Greater reason, this new caveat has appeared - this Scott Brown thing - does this mean more fighting and now nothing Good will manifest from Congress at all? - just more fighting? Somehow I must believe that there is a purging taking place amidst all of these battles and fighting amongst us and world wars - within humanity itself - and this a purging that is taking place - and it is happening at an exponential rate right now - we are all witnessing the purging of the Greed Factor and and the antiquated 'Separation Consciousnesss' taking place...which is simply another cog in the wheel leading to a never-before-seen consciousness-shift...soon to take place. We as a Whole must know that we are all connected. Stop this crazy fussing and fighting (amongst ourselves) and war (amongst other nations) and greed (throughout humanity's consciousness) - and unite as brothers/sisters. Let's stop the world of accumulation - let's begin the world of love for one another - how about a back-to- the-basics Barter system like our very wise Forefathers, the Native American People. We are all one - what hurts one, hurts us all - so can we not see that this is why War and Greed and Fighting Amongst Us Must Stop?! What is good for one is good for all - because we are all one energetic field of Being. Why don't we get it?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 


Security code
Refresh