Are Tea Partiers Racist?
Tea Party rally, Washington, DC. A protester wraps himself in an American flag, 12/07/09. (photo: Getty Images)
new study shows that the movement's supporters are more likely to be racially resentful.
Ever since the Tea Party phenomenon gathered steam last spring, it has been plagued by charges of racism. Placards at rallies have depicted President Barack Obama as a witch doctor, denounced his supposed plans for "white slavery," and likened Congress to a slave owner and the taxpayer to a "n----r." Opponents have seized on these examples as proof that Tea Partiers are angry white folks who can't abide having a black president. Supporters, on the other hand, claim that the hateful signs are the work of a small fringe and that they unfairly malign a movement that simply seeks to rein in big government. In the absence of empirical evidence to support either characterization, the debate has essentially deadlocked.
Until now, that is. A new survey by the University of Washington Institute for the Study of Ethnicity, Race & Sexuality offers fresh insight into the racial attitudes of Tea Party sympathizers. "The data suggests that people who are Tea Party supporters have a higher probability" - 25 percent, to be exact - "of being racially resentful than those who are not Tea Party supporters," says Christopher Parker, who directed the study. "The Tea Party is not just about politics and size of government. The data suggests it may also be about race."
Surveyers asked respondents in California and a half dozen battleground states (like Michigan and Ohio) a series of questions that political scientists typically use to measure racial hostility. On each one, Tea Party backers expressed more resentment than the rest of the population, even when controlling for partisanship and ideology. When read the statement that "if blacks would only try harder, they could be just as well off as whites," 73 percent of the movement's supporters agreed, while only 33 percent of people who disapproved of the Tea Party agreed. Asked if blacks should work their way up "without special favors," as the Irish, Italians, and other groups did, 88 percent of supporters agreed, compared to 56 percent of opponents. The study revealed that Tea Party enthusiasts were also more likely to have negative opinions of Latinos and immigrants.
These results are bolstered by a recent New York Times/CBS News survey finding that white Tea Party supporters were more likely to believe that "the Obama administration favors blacks over whites" and that "too much has been made of the problems facing black people." The survey also showed that Tea Party sympathizers are whiter, older, wealthier, and more well-educated than the average American. They're "just as likely to be employed, and more likely to describe their economic situation as very or fairly good," according to a summary of the poll.
If Tea Party supporters are doing relatively fine, what are they so riled up about? These studies suggest that, at least in part, it's race. The country that the Tea Partiers grew up in is irrevocably changing. Last month, new demographic data showed that minority births are on the verge of outpacing white births. By 2050, Hispanics are expected to account for more than a quarter of the American population. The Tea Partiers "feel a loss ... like their status has been diminished," says David Bositis of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, which examines issues of race. "If you listen to [their] language, it's always about 'taking our country back.' But it's really not taking the country back as is. It's taking the country back" - as in time.
Bositis finds the movement's arguments about reckless federal spending unpersuasive. Why, he asks, weren't they up in arms when President George W. Bush launched two costly wars and created a new unfunded mandate with his Medicare prescription-drug plan? Why didn't they take to the streets when he converted a surplus into a massive deficit? "I don't like to be in a position where I'm characterizing people as being racially biased," says Bositis. "But when the shoe fits, what do you do?" Given modern societal norms, "they know they can't use any overtly racist language," he contends. "So they use coded language" - questioning the patriotism of the president or complaining about "socialist" schemes to redistribute wealth.
The Tea Partiers bridle at such accusations. "That is so pathetic," says Danita Kilcullen, the founder of Tea Party Fort Lauderdale. "Nobody in the Tea Party movement that I know is a racist." She notes that she attends a church with a black pastor, supports a black candidate (Allen West) in a local congressional race, and backs a Latino candidate (Marco Rubio) for U.S. Senate. When a protestor showed up at one of her group's rallies with a racist sign, she says, she personally kicked him off the corner. "We absolutely don't tolerate anything like that," says Kilcullen. "Nobody uses the N word. Nobody calls Mexicans all those ugly things that people say. Those are lies about us." She concedes that the movement doesn't draw many African-Americans. "But that's because all the black people voted for Obama," she says. "Well, not all - but 90 percent." (It was actually 95 percent.)
Some Tea Partiers blame the media for casting them as racists. "It really makes me mad," says Tom Fitzhugh, a Tea party activist in Tampa. "They have tried to portray us as a bunch of radical extremists." He considers Obama an abomination - possibly "the most radical-voting senator that ever was" and someone likely to "take us down the path of destruction." He believes the administration is intent on taking away his guns, trampling on states' rights, and opening the borders with Canada and Mexico. He has serious doubts that Obama was born in the U.S. and suspects that the president is a closet Muslim. (There's no evidence to support any of these accusations.) But his anger has nothing to do with race, he says. The real issue is that Obama is "taking down the Constitution and the way it's governed us for [hundreds of] years." All he wants, in other words, is to take his country back.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |












Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Their rationalization s are the same ones I've heard any time a Democrat was POTUS. . .just very extremely exaggerated in Obama's case. The conspiracy theories added to it just ramp up the ante, so to speak.
Their attitudes are sublimated; maybe they truly believe they're not there. . .but they are. Friends and family would deny it as well, but it is there.
"When mouth and action disagree, believe action." - Frank Herbert
On the other hand this article is a typical gutless liberal copout. It lays out the evidence and then gives the tea-party the last word (in this case the entire last paragraph). The message that the reader takes home is "taking back the country", which is basically saying "If it's all white, then it's all right". By their "country" they mean they keep power.
The ironic part of all this bigotry and racism is, it took an American of color (a black president) to bring the truth about institutionaliz ed racism in the US of A!
The question is, how are we as American citizens who cherish and live by the Constitution of the United States going to deal with it! Will we degenerate morally like them by confronting them as such? The concept of an eye for an eye comes to mind. The time might not be so long before that could happen. I now consider them the enemy to everything America (the US of A) stands for.
Frankly speaking, where is Gen Sherman when you need him.
And the word is "crowd".
Hey, I don't like some of Obama's policies myself. For example: his health care legislation mimics that Of Mitt Romney, a Republican as you know. I wish Obama would have settled for no less than single payer/universal health care. But you refer to corporate welfare as if Obama invented it. That's not true. Government take over of the auto industry? Gee? Did he really? Or did he take temporary control while GM got it's house in order? The war? Wasn't that Bush's baby to begin with? You don't have to support Obama, but no one has to lie and call him a socialist or a communist or all the other nonsense T-baggers say.
Well, I'm not doing 'relatively fine'. But apparently if I WAS doing 'relatively fine', I would not be allowed to oppose any government policies. Interesting, but I'm not sure how that logically follows.
"white Tea Party supporters were more likely to believe that "the Obama administration favors blacks over whites""
Does this mean that blacks who think Bush favored whites are automatically racist as well? Completely nonsensical...
Yes.
The point about being riled up isn't a particularly good argument so I agree with you there.
make me feel superior intellectually, emotionally and spiritually. So I say let them make fools of themselves it makes me feel so good.
Why are we surprised these people are calling obama a nazi? This is simply how they play defense, get the nutjobs to scream bloody-murder.
What's funny is people who want to return to the 50's only want some of the 50's policies. They want to be able to treat blacks bad, but they foolishly oppose progressive taxation and the role of unions (the two items which basically define the economic framework of the 50's).
RSS feed for comments to this post