Rachel Takes Us Back to the Future
Rachel Maddow on assignment in Afghanistan, 07/05/10. (photo: Rachel Maddow Show/MSNBC)
Reader Supported News | Perspective
very June, I leave my Northern California home and head south to our annual Gulf Coast family reunion. I might as well be an alien visiting from another planet. My appearance at these soirees is a bit scandalous because, quite frankly, many suspect that my time in California has turned me gay.
Why do they think I've gone to the dark side? "It's her square glasses," one redneck "in the know" told my family. "She's from Cal-uh-forn-eye-eh and single ... at her age!" Well, what better proof is there?!
My smarter than usual smart-ass siblings goad me as they playfully drawl out their characteristically slow pronunciation of California. It's a knowing self-parody. They suspect Californians see Texans as nothing but fossil fuel guzzlin', rattlesnake humping hicks. And, it's true ... many Californians do. However, the preconceived notions cut both ways. My Texas friends call just about anyone from California a "socialist" or a "homo." Suspicion of the "dreaded socialist homo" is why they worry so much about the transformation of my appearance.
What they don't know is that my 22 years in television, endlessly coloring my hair and plucking my eyebrows and exercising into a size six has cured me forever of the desire to work hard at looking plastic. Still, though, they wonder ... sometimes out loud ... why I "let myself go," which simply means I refuse to wear make-up in the Gulf Coast heat. They think not "gettin' dolled up" means I've gone to the dogs. What my Southern friends cannot grasp is that I am no longer preoccupied with looks because I no longer have to be. I'm no longer in broadcast news.
Enter Rachel Maddow. Rachel's simple, clean and decidedly muted appearance harkens back to a time when credibility made the newscast what it was, and when sleeveless shirts and mini-skirts were the stock and trade of game show sidekicks and soap opera vixens. She is buttoned-down and smart and knows how to stay out of the way of a story. How does she manage it? Easy, she does not let sex get in the way. Is the hot button issue of "being gay" comforting in some way to viewers? Especially when juxtaposed with the alternatives? Rachel has somehow made it clear her "gayness" is not the sum of her identity. If only the vixens could rely more on grey matter than sculptured legs, perhaps we could take them more seriously.
Sometime during the 80s, "sex sells" crept in from the dark corners of advertising and into the bright lights of the newsroom. By the 90s, "sex" became an adjective. "Sexing up a show," became a newsroom mantra. I heard the word "sex" used so often in the world of news broadcasting, I wondered if we'd become pimps instead of anchors, call girls instead of reporters.
But there is Rachel, sitting smartly in her square glasses and easily disproving the conventional wisdom. Maybe sex sells some things, but smart sells the news. And the two should not go together. In a masterful stroke of genius, she appears a-sexual by simply refusing to put sex on display.
Normally this formula wouldn't make corporate stockholders happy. But, Rachel is focus-group friendly and demographically delightful.
Both men and women like her.
Women watch her mostly because she represents their Jungian shadow self. The good shadow, that is. Smart, funny, sarcastic, playful ... Rachel's the sort of woman other "down to earth" women look up to. She's un-plucked, unbleached, easy to relate to, and there's an added bonus. Rachel's not competing for their man's attention.
Men like to watch Rachel Maddow for some of the same reasons. They are not threatened by her. They can trust her because she's not leading with her cleavage. Rachel's power comes from the synapses between her lobes .
Rupert Murdoch, owner of News Corp and FOX News, has been quoted as saying he is not prejudiced against smart women and that he "lets them 'do' the news." He's typical of many men and, in a strange twist, some women in corporate news today. Sex sells, and right now it's selling wars, corporate agendas, disrespect for government, and inane celebrity gossip.
Rachel gives broadcast news credibility by refusing to make it about her.
There's no sex for sale on Rachel's highly successful broadcast. Hey, Consultants ... are you watching?
Leslie Griffith has been a television anchor, foreign correspondent and an investigative reporter in newspaper, radio and television for over 25 years. Among her many achievements are two Edward R Murrow Awards, nine Emmies, 37 Emmy Nominations, a National Emmy nomination for writing, and more than a dozen other awards for journalism. She is currently working on a documentary, giving speeches on "Reforming the Media," and writing for many on-line publications, as well as writing a book called "Shut Up and Read." She hopes the book, her speeches, and her articles on the media will help remind the nation that journalism was once about public service ... not profit. To contact Leslie, go to lesliegriffith.org.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |












Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
I don't own a TV, so my friends invite me over to watch her show and the companion production. The we can have our collective agreements together.
Bottom line: Counterpoint within the MSM.
Rachel Maddow, whatever her sexuality, with her MIND OVER CHATTER slogan, is a National Treasure.
Senator Maddow?
Maybe later, President Maddow.
Smart IS sexy.
When she told senator Barbara Boxer her reading glasses were "cute" I almost died!
By the standards of the old Manhattan bohemia, she is also breathtakingly sexy -- the sort of nearly forgotten sexiness that emanates directly from the intellect. But of course bohemian Manhattan was truly "Another Country," just as James Baldwin so aptly wrote.
Alas, just as bohemia was methodically suppressed by the Ruling Class, so will Ms. Maddow's flawless reportage probably soon be silenced. It is too provocative for Moron Nation -- too challenging to Palinoid ignorance and bible-thump bigotry -- which is why I fear Ms. Maddow and her colleagues will be blacklisted to obscurity once Comcast buys NBC.
out with their GOP dominated remarks.
Also, she is in appearance, a truly beautiful woman, no matter what her background is. That is her business, and I applaud her for that.. I can only hope that we will have Rachel Maddow on our TV programs for years and years to come. She is truly an inspiration.
I live outside of the US, and watch Rachel's programme live on streaming video: http://www.justin.tv/rockinroosters1 No cable required.
Rachel has a PhD in Political Science from Oxford University in England. Arguably hence the depth of her notes, research and knowledge.
If anything she is overqualified for television, but let's hope she is a catalyst for change. Believe me, no one in Europe takes US news seriously...exc ept, they are her.
I agree, too, except the word I would use is "wry." Her show seems to take that tone in every story and I don't know why. It feels like a "this is what they're doing to us" tone and I'm such a fan of her ability to translate difficult subjects for us to understand I wish she'd stick to her wonderful reportage. Still a fan, but irritated. She's better on Bill Maher... I think.
She's brilliant, funny and sincere. She has depth and a sense of irony...somethi ng the Fox babes wouldn't understand nor are paid to.
in political science....Dr. Maddow!! And she's Rhoades Scholar.
Some credentials huh? She restores my shrinking faith in
the ability of the media to serve the citizens.
I never feel as though I'm being yelled at on my own couch!
My problem is that we have to THINK of sex(y) when we think of news.
Maybe she'll be step one in helping us get past all that and grow up to just appreciate someone who delivers "straight scoop" regardless of their whatever orientation.
She's a genius. And Keith's "wry" delivery first won me over to MSNBC.
Hope they keep it up and hey, Rachel...you de best,lady!
You do good stuff.
- a retired journalist
Wow MSNBC Must be really proud of itself. Finally an honest intelligent straight shooter. Who brings Truth and justice back to the News room. Walter Cronkite must be proud.
God Bless you rachel with Love
My friends and I had hoped that she would be the President's Press Secretary simply because of her eloquence, sense of humor and incredible intellect. I am now so thankful that she is, instead, the beacon of light in a medium that has become filled with darkness. We need journalists who speak truthfully and are not afraid of the 'difficult' interviews where, when the evidence is revealed, so is the truth. Thank you Rachel for giving us truth in journalism again!
The facts are, the US government on the republican side has degraded the nation into a country of lies, deception, mayhem and hypocrisy. And they did all of these in 8 years they were in power.
It's comforting to find so many like-minded fans writing in here, but it's troubling as well. It suggests that ideologically based Internet news lists and websites, combined with many cable and radio news channels, encourage us to seek out only those sources that tend to reinforce our own political leanings.
I worry that most of us--myself and my elected representatives included--are losing the ability to seriously exchange ideas with those who disagree with us. We'd rather score points than solve problems; we'd rather win power, reward friends and punish enemies than use power to "...form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,...prom ote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity..."
Rachel Maddow--and all too few others-- are perhaps happy exceptions.
If Rachel was honest about that, I'd be a fan.
Rachel is a blessing in disguise. She is what America needs the most, courage, honesty, convictions, commitment.
Hello, are listening out there?
Rachel Maddow just went and saved the War in Afghanistan for the neo-cons. Like all MSM news people, she does not allow anything critical of Israel on her show. She serves power and wealth. Her cute lesbianism is just another way to play you.
They give news not propaganda.
I feel sorry for the newscasters who are forced to give out contrived propaganda and not news, by the station owners whose motives are driven by their politics, and even more sad are the people who believe the distortions and
their slanted views.
I can only hope that listeners learn to distinguish between news and propaganda.
RSS feed for comments to this post