Share
Email This Page
add comment

3 Reasons for Obama to Take Control From BP

Print
09 June 2010
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

 

 

hree More Reasons for the President to Take Control Over BP's Gulf Operation

1. Why hasn't BP moved more of its rigs and tankers to the site?

Because BP's first responsibility is to maximize shareholder value, and moving more rigs and tankers would be too expensive. Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen, the government's man on the scene, said BP planned to move another rig to the spill site June 14, which would enable the company to boost its capacity to collect oil from the ruptured well to 28,000 barrels (1.18 million gallons/4.45 million liters) a day.

2. Why isn't BP leveling with the American people about how many barrels of oil is gushing into the Gulf?

Because BP's first responsibility is to its shareholders, and a bigger leak means more liability. Government scientists estimate the leak spews 12,000-19,000 barrels a day, with one estimate as high as 25,000 barrels. BP says it's not nearly this much.

3. Why isn't BP acknowledging a huge plume of oil developing deep under water?

Ditto. On Tuesday, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration researchers reported subsurface oil as far as 142 miles from the leaking Gulf well, the first clear confirmation of such a plume. On Wednesday, BP rejected the report, insisting that it has not found any significant concentration of crude under the surface. "We haven't found any large concentrations of oil under the sea. To my knowledge, no one has," BP Chief Operating Officer Doug Suttles said on NBC's TODAY show.

 

Open Article On Originating Site

Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," and his most recent book, "Supercapitalism." His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

 
+10 # Jyll 2010-06-10 04:14
It was stated on 24 hour news, yesterday, that spillers are, supposedly, fined by the gallon. So, this would explain why the volume of the spill is constantly under-reported by BP.
Do you really expect them to be honest under *any* circumstances. The whole fiasco has been one gigantic run-around.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+7 # fletch 2010-06-10 06:34
It was haliburton that put in the cement plugs. They are just as culpable here. Why the free ride? Let's start indicting them too.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+6 # AML 2010-06-10 05:27
Thank you Robert for keeping up the pressure to DO something. Your voice of reason and passion is soothing in this crazy environment.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-5 # Warren Messineo 2010-06-10 05:29
The BIG reason Obama will NOT take control is that he is not a TAKE CONTROL type person. He delegates, ducks and takes half measures at best on everything he 'acts' upon. Then he makes a stirring speach and huffs and puffs a little. Then things go back to business as usual with the people TAKING CONTROL who were in control and screwed things up in the first place. Look at Wall Street, the banking system, the healthcare bill, Afghanistan, and now this oil spill. I thought he would wake up by now but it seems that he is content to just allow things to role along with very little change.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+7 # blogworth 2010-06-10 06:12
Everybody had better start paying attention to natural gas drilling plans for the marcellus shale region in Pennsylvania and New York. It will effect the water supplies for millions of people from greater New York to Philadelphia and beyond. The 'clean' natural gas industry will destroy the environment up there -- drilling today is extremely polluting and environmentally destructive, requiring blasting millions of gallons of toxic chemicals a mile into the earth... assuming it won't spread from there... and then 'containing' and transporting that polluted mess via hundreds of truck trips per day per well -- even without major spills and leaks to the watershed (which are already happening routinely in existing and 'test' wells.) PAY ATTENTION EVERYONE it will make the Gulf disaster seem 'almost' like a walk in the park when the drinking water of something like 20% of the US population is contaminated in the name of 'drill baby drill.'
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+12 # fletch 2010-06-10 06:33
BP? What about liquidating Haliburton? They did this. Haliburton should be stripped of assets and forced to pay along with BP. Run a story about that please.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-7 # Jacqueline OConnor 2010-06-10 06:42
Of course Obama should have done more but this is what we get when we elect a kid to do a man's job. Obama has no experience in anything but pursuading people, which is a fine characteristic if there is some substance (message) to deliver. We are giving him OJT and he is failing nonetheless. With all our angst about incumbents, replacing people is more than a face transplant.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # Sukumar 2010-06-10 07:53
Even without "taking over BP" nothing stops the government from renting oil tankers and making them available to collect the gushing oil. Why isn't this being done?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # WCS 2010-06-10 08:23
If you live in a 2 story house, and a pipe bursts and leaks into the downstairs, do you go upstairs to cut off the source of water - - or do you hire people to come in to just mop until the primary source is CUT OFF ? YES ! The only solution is to cut the damnable oil OFF. ASAP!

To not use logic is only costing the gulf resident harm - - but meanwhile, it does put $'s in BP's pocket, to help pay toward the ever expanding spill - -until they declare bankrupcy. Then the taxpayers again are left holding the bag. Big Business seems to always will in the end - - not us folks.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # ab 2010-06-10 09:18
BP's responsibility to its shareholders will be blated when they go bankrupt.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # Amy B. Liberatore 2010-06-10 10:13
This whole catastrophe is about corporate greed, the oil companies helping dictate the dereg of their own industry through Dick Cheney. And yes, Transocean and Halliburton should face charges. Call or email your members of Congress NOW!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # Lola 2010-06-11 08:31
If Haliburton was there 20 hours before the explosion trying to cement the area, wouldn't that indicate they knew what was going to happen? Why is so difficult to initiate criminal proceedings against Halibutron and Cheney?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote