Email This Page Print This Page add comment

Health Care Is a Civil Right

18 March 2010

Rep. Dennis Kucinich testifies before the House Judiciary Committee on Captiol Hill. 07/25/08 (photo: Getty Images)

Rep. Dennis Kucinich testifies before the House Judiciary Committee on Captiol Hill. 07/25/08 (photo: Getty Images)


ach generation has had to take up the question of how to provide for the health of the people of our nation. And each generation has grappled with difficult questions of how to meet the needs of our people. I believe health care is a civil right. Each time as a nation we have reached to expand our basic rights, we have witnessed a slow and painful unfolding of a democratic pageant of striving, of resistance, of breakthroughs, of opposition, of unrelenting efforts and of eventual triumph.

I have spent my life struggling for the rights of working class people and for health care. I grew up understanding firsthand what it meant for families who did not get access to needed care. I lived in 21 different places by the time I was 17, including in a couple of cars. I understand the connection between poverty and poor health care, the deeper meaning of what Native Americans have called "hole in the body, hole in the spirit." I struggled with Crohn's disease much of my adult life, to discover sixteen years ago a near-cure in alternative medicine and following a plant-based diet. I have learned with difficulty the benefits of taking charge personally of my own health care. On those few occasions when I have needed it, I have had access to the best allopathic practitioners. As a result I have received the blessings of vitality and high energy. Health and health care is personal for each one of us. As a former surgical technician I know that there are many people who dedicate their lives to helping others improve theirs. I also know their struggles with an insufficient health care system.

There are some who believe that health care is a privilege based on ability to pay. This is the model President Obama is dealing with, attempting to open up health care to another 30 million people, within the context of the for-profit insurance system. There are others who believe that health care is a basic right and ought to be provided through a not-for-profit plan. This is what I have tirelessly advocated.

I have carried the banner of national health care in two presidential campaigns, in party platform meetings, and as co-author of HR676, Medicare for All. I have worked to expand the health care debate beyond the current for-profit system, to include a public option and an amendment to free the states to pursue single payer. The first version of the health care bill, while badly flawed, contained provisions which I believed made the bill worth supporting in committee. The provisions were taken out of the bill after it passed committee.

I joined with the Progressive Caucus saying that I would not support the bill unless it had a strong public option and unless it protected the right of people to pursue single payer at a state level. It did not. I kept my pledge and voted against the bill. I have continued to oppose it while trying to get the provisions back into the bill. Some have speculated I may be in a position of casting the deciding vote. The President's visit to my district on Monday underscored the urgency of this moment.

I have taken this fight farther than many in Congress cared to carry it because I know what my constituents experience on a daily basis. Come to my district in Cleveland and you will understand.

The people of Ohio's 10th district have been hard hit by an economy where wealth has accelerated upwards through plant closings, massive unemployment, small business failings, lack of access to credit, foreclosures and the high cost of health care and limited access to care. I take my responsibilities to the people of my district personally. The focus of my district office is constituent service, which more often than not involves social work to help people survive economic perils. It also involves intervening with insurance companies.

In the past week it has become clear that the vote on the final health care bill will be very close. I take this vote with the utmost seriousness. I am quite aware of the historic fight that has lasted the better part of the last century to bring America in line with other modern democracies in providing single payer health care. I have seen the political pressure and the financial pressure being asserted to prevent a minimal recognition of this right, even within the context of a system dominated by private insurance companies.

I know I have to make a decision, not on the bill as I would like to see it, but the bill as it is. My criticisms of the legislation have been well reported. I do not retract them. I incorporate them in this statement. They still stand as legitimate and cautionary. I still have doubts about the bill. I do not think it is a first step toward anything I have supported in the past. This is not the bill I wanted to support, even as I continue efforts until the last minute to modify the bill.

However after careful discussions with the President Obama, Speaker Pelosi, Elizabeth my wife and close friends, I have decided to cast a vote in favor of the legislation. If my vote is to be counted, let it now count for passage of the bill, hopefully in the direction of comprehensive health care reform. We must include coverage for those excluded from this bill. We must free the states. We must have control over private insurance companies and the cost their very existence imposes on American families. We must strive to provide a significant place for alternative and complementary medicine, religious health science practice, and the personal responsibility aspects of health care which include diet, nutrition, and exercise.

The health care debate has been severely hampered by fear, myths, and by hyper-partisanship. The President clearly does not advocate socialism or a government takeover of health care. The fear that this legislation has engendered has deep roots, not in foreign ideology but in a lack of confidence, a timidity, mistrust and fear which post 911 America has been unable to shake.

This fear has so infected our politics, our economics and our international relations that as a nation we are losing sight of the expanded vision, the electrifying potential we caught a glimpse of with the election of Barack Obama. The transformational potential of his presidency, and of ourselves, can still be courageously summoned in ways that will reconnect America to our hopes for expanded opportunities for jobs, housing, education, peace, and yes, health care.

I want to thank those who have supported me personally and politically as I have struggled with this decision. I ask for your continued support in our ongoing efforts to bring about meaningful change. As this bill passes I will renew my efforts to help those state organizations which are aimed at stirring a single payer movement which eliminates the predatory role of private insurers who make money not providing health care. I have taken a detour through supporting this bill, but I know the destination I will continue to lead, for as long as it takes, whatever it takes to an America where health care will be firmly established as a civil right.

 

Comments  

 
+1 # Brad Sandler 2010-03-18 10:17
Actually, Health Care is not a right. Rights are something that the people have exclusive of Government. We have a right to speak out, a right to vote, a right to worship in whatever manner we choose. I am sure there are others. On the other hand Government has an obligation to provide for our safety, well being, education and a means of communication (Post Office). Health care is a government obligation. Just like other obligations such as police and fire, paid from the General Funds; not by individuals. Yes, you can hire your own bodyguard, and you could buy premium insurance. But the government supplies us as an obligation to protecting the persons inside its borders. This is a difference with a consequence.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # JR Leonardi 2010-03-18 14:27
No. A "right" is a creature of law, hence of government. A "right" is a law-guaranteed, hence government-guaranteed, privilege AND power AND immunity AND lack of duty.

Kucinich's mistake is arguing that health care be a "civil" right. He ought to pursue making heath care a federal statutory personal/individual-economic right.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-7 # Peggy 2010-03-18 16:51
Quoting JR Leonardi:
No. A "right" is a creature of law, hence of government. A "right" is a law-guaranteed, hence government-guaranteed, privilege AND power AND immunity AND lack of duty.

Kucinich's mistake is arguing that health care be a "civil" right. He ought to pursue making heath care a federal statutory personal/individual-economic right.


And who will pay for all this?!?!? Do you think the Federal Government is the Easter Bunny or Santa Clause or the Tooth Fairy - do you not understand where this money comes from
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # Norman P Whitzell 2010-03-18 17:32
Kucinich's mistake is arguing that health care be a "civil" right. He ought to pursue making heath care a federal statutory personal/individual-economic right.

And who will pay for all this?!?!? Do you think the Federal Government is the Easter Bunny or Santa Clause or the Tooth Fairy - do you not understand where this money comes from

The Government is the Body Politic that we entrust with out rights and it has a fiduciary responsibility to spend our treasure to make our lives safer, healthier and more meaningful. Wars are always financed without a groan, or at least with less objection from the people, we cannot repair our bridges, schools and infrastructure for lack of funds supporting more than 700 military bases throughout the world. Our priorities are backward.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8 # Kurt 2010-03-18 17:53
Every other modern democracy does this for every citizen in their respective countries and spends far less that the US that leaves 15-17% of its citizens with no access to medical care.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # Kay 2010-03-22 04:41
And that is why everyone comes here for health care.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # Lois Hamilton 2010-03-19 10:31
A Universal Single Payer Health Care system will save this nation $800 Billion a year. Why can't you get it correct, Peggy, and why are there so many people out there like you? Lies and misinformation do a great disservice to our country.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+12 # mtnviewco 2010-03-18 10:22
Dennis, you are one of the few Patriots remaining......... thank you for this explanation of your vote.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # Barb G 2010-03-18 20:21
Quoting mtnviewco:
Dennis, you are one of the few Patriots remaining......... thank you for this explanation of your vote.


Thanks for all you have done and continue to do. In this case, thanks for deciding not to hold out for the perfect in order to, hopefully, bring us the possible that we need.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-11 # D Johnson 2010-03-18 10:31
Be honest, Dennis, you got a ride in the big plane and caved. None of your b.s. can explain that away. The bill is a pile of crap and everyone knows it; if you had the principles you claim you have, then you would be working to make it more acceptable, i.e. public option, Medicare choice, etc.- you know the route. Sorry, but you just lost any credibility for anything you may say or do in the future. What a shame.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+7 # AB 2010-03-18 12:06
"promote the general welfare" is part of the preamble to our constitution. That means the government MUST provide health care, to everyone. Forcing people to buy insurance promotes welfare for insurance companies, fining them if they do not is probably unconstitutiona l for many reasons. This is a terrible bill, and in an effort to get something rather than nothing, Kuchinich has sold his soul. No further action will be taken, because "we have a health-care bill" and the insurance companies are again rewarded for their greed.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # AB 2010-03-18 12:09
The constitution requires that the government "promote the general welfare" It's in the preamble. This bill promotes the welfare of the insurance companies, forcing people to buy insurance or be fined. Probably not constitutional. I don't know why Kucinich has sold out-surely he doesn't believe this issue will ever be revived!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+10 # badbf 2010-03-18 12:15
Thank you, Dennis Kucinich. You are one of the very few people in Congress that is saying what I want to hear about this. WHY, WHY, WHY do this country and the people running it just NOT GET IT?? Why do they defend health care as a for-profit business rather than, as you say, a basic human right? It is obviously in the best interests of EVERY citizen to simply have all-inclusive, non-profit Medicare for all! (With the possible exception of the insurance company executives... who seem to have the whole thing locked up, bought and paid for).
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+9 # Janny 2010-03-18 12:44
Thank you, Congressman Kucinich, for doing the right thing. Like you, I am not happy with the current health insurance reform legislation. But if it is defeated, we won't have even the positive provisions it contains. I believe that you and other legislative leaders will introduce and successfully pay subsequent bills that will keep moving forward to the ultimate goal of universal healthcare, which I, like you, believe is a basic human right.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+10 # A. Edward Cullin 2010-03-18 13:04
Dennis,

Please carry on your crusade to make health care a firmly established civil right for all Americans.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8 # Mauna Richardson 2010-03-18 13:35
Thank you for your integrity. And, thank you for your vote to support this imperfect bill. Hopefully, in the future we may have true reform and provide all US citizens with affordable healthcare.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5 # RonaldV4 2010-03-18 14:48
Brad, this is Rep Kucinich's and other trying to make it a right, just like carrying/owning a gun. And this has been a long struggle.
Another long struggle has been to enforce the Bill of Rights in its entirety.
Including that portion that includes 'The right to pursue Happiness.
I give thanks to Rep Kucinich for his endurance to continually promote the well-being of each and every American
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8 # lewagner 2010-03-18 16:15
"I don't know why Kucinich has sold out-surely he doesn't believe this issue will ever be revived!"
Don't worry, Dennis will keep on agitating, as he has been in the past. Killing the present bad bill certainly wouldn't do anything to help "revive" the issue, either, any more than passing it will.
Nobody has a magic wand. When votes are lacking, all anybody can do is agitate -- and Dennis has most assuredly been doing that over the years. What makes you think he'll stop now?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+7 # wow 2010-03-18 18:11
it is perhaps because americans seem to love black and white dichotomies of good and evil, right and wrong, that you cannot see the necessary gradations of mature consensus building. neither rep or dem has the least time for the other, Kucinich is a saint, he is a fool. What benefit do you yanks get from this manic finger pointing and chest thumping? The rest of the world doesn't just scratch its collective head, it averts its gaze at the sheer stupidity. If you had any sense at all you would just examine closely all the systems by which all the other democracies (yes there are many others) supply basic and extensive healthcare to their citizens without so much as a peep from the insurance companies therein.
and then you would just implement it accepting that neither side got everything it wanted but all being americans you did the best you could collectively accomplish. What are you waiting for before you start to show compassion to each other, a friggin martian invasion?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+5 # Sue Hartman 2010-03-18 19:48
Affordable healthcare is an integral part of the pursuit of happiness. No affordable healthcare equals no pursuit of happiness.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # Mark OBrien 2010-03-18 21:29
I know what it's like to be unable to afford health care--I tore a muscle in a post-grad soccer game; I couldn't walk right for 6 months and never did see a doctor as I had no health insurance. For the past 10 years, I've lived in Taiwan, a nation with great, public health care. Still, I'm against the Obama plan. Why? The US economy is already a mess. This could destroy what's left of the middle class--they're the ones who will end up paying for it. Health care works in Taiwan because there are no greedy, private insurers involved and doctors make much less than in the USA, even though many of them studied in the US. Just look at the financial mess that Chicago and California are in...and we want every boomer with nothing else to do standing in line at the hospital seeking a cure for old age while the rest of us pay for it? I'm a big fan of the health care system in Taiwan--it cost me $3 USD this week to see an eye Dr.! In the USA? Not this plan and not during this economic crisis!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # Christopher Marlowe 2010-03-19 15:39
I believe the best system would be single payer akin to the Canadian model. It works & they like it. The detractors argue against that system by lying. Watch Dennis Kucinich confront that liar Dr. Gratzer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXP7bRbuhHU I would not base my argument in health care as a right, but that it is necessary, just like unemployment insurance. I don't think it is constitutional for the Federal Government to require everyone to purchase private health insurance. I'm saddened that Kucinich gave in.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # foxtrottango 2010-03-20 06:32
And like civil rights in America, it doesn't exist for everyone. Only for the politicians and their corrupted corporate supporters.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Clarice 2010-03-20 08:57
Dennis has made "unpopular" decisions in the past, but has always been thoughtful and insightful in his judgment. I am AMAZED that he revealed that he has Crohn's disease. My husband has suffered with Crohn's disease for over 25 years. The fact that Dennis has been able to function under so much stress as a politician AND found a healthy way to control this debilitating disease, has given me a renewed sense of respect and admiration for him!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote