Is the War Coming Home?
One of the infamous Abu Ghraib Prison torture images, 04/15/04. (photo: US Guards, Abu Ghraib)
"We are being attacked over here because we are over there."
aisal Shahzad sought to massacre scores of fellow Americans in Times Square with a bomb made of M-88 firecrackers, non-explosive fertilizer, gasoline and alarm clocks.
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab tried to blow up a US airliner over Detroit with a firebomb concealed in his underpants. Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan shot dead 13 fellow soldiers at Fort Hood and wounded 29.
Why did these men attempt the mass murder of Americans who did no harm to them? What impelled them to seek martyrdom amid a pile of American corpses?
Though all were Muslims, none seems to have been a longtime America-hater or natural-born killer. Hasan was proud to wear Army fatigues to mosque. Shahzad had become a US citizen. Abdulmutallab was the privileged son of a prominent Nigerian banker.
The New York Times ties all three to the Internet sermons of Anwar al-Awlaki, a Yemen-based imam born and educated in the United States who inspires Muslims worldwide to jihad against America. But, following Sept. 11, al-Awlaki had been seen as a bridge between Islam and the West.
Now President Obama has authorized his assassination.
What do the four have in common?
All were converted in manhood into haters of America willing to kill and die in a jihad against America. And the probability is high that there are many more like them living amongst us who wish to bring the war in the Af-Pak here to America.
But what radicalized them? And why do they hate us?
Taking a cue from George W. Bush, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said of the Times Square bomber, "We will not be intimidated by those who hate the freedoms that make ... this country so great."
This was the mantra after Sept. 11. We are hated not because of what we do in the Middle East, but because of who we are: people who love freedom and stand for women's rights.
And that is why they hate us - and why they come to kill us.
In a way this is a comforting thought, because it absolves us of the need to think. For no patriotic American is going to demand we surrender our freedom to prevent fanatics from attacking us.
The Wall Street Journal's Bret Stephens advances a parallel view. We are hated, he says, because of our popular culture.
We are loathed in the Islamic world, Stephens writes, because of "Lady Gaga - or, if you prefer, Madonna, Farrah Fawcett, Marilyn Monroe, Josephine Baker or any other American woman who has ... personified what the Egyptian Islamist writer Sayyid Qutb once called 'the American Temptress.'"
This hatred is at least 60 years old, says Stephens, for Qutb wrote even before "Elvis, Playboy, the pill, women's lib, acid tabs, gay rights, Studio 54, Jersey shore and ... Lady Gaga."
Qutb's revulsion at American degeneracy is why his legion of Islamic followers hate us.
Again, a comforting thought. For, if Lady Gaga is the problem, there is nothing we Americans can do about it.
Yet, this is as self-delusional as saying the FLN set off bombs in movie theaters and cafes in Algiers to kill the French because of what Brigitte Bardot was doing on screen in "And God Created Woman."
American's toxic culture may be a reason devout Muslims detest us. It is not why they come here to kill us. Mohammed Atta's friends did not target Hollywood, but centers and symbols of US military and political power.
US Marines were not attacked by Hezbollah until we inserted those Marines into Lebanon's civil war. No Iraqi committed an act of terror against us before we invaded Iraq. And if the Sept. 11 killers were motivated by hatred of the immorality of our society, what were they doing getting lap dances in Delray Beach?
Osama bin Laden declared war on us, first and foremost, to end the massive US presence on sacred Saudi soil that is home to Mecca and Medina.
Some may insist this was not his real motive. But, apparently, the Saudis believed him, for they quickly kicked us out of Prince Sultan Air Base.
As for the Taliban, they would surely make short work of Lady Gaga. But their stated grievance is the same as Gen. Washington's in our war with the British: If you want this war to end, get out of our country.
By Occam's razor, the simplest explanation is usually the right one. Looking at America's wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Maj. Hasan, Abdulmutallab and Shahzad decided that what we call the war on terror was in reality a war on Islam.
All decided to use their access to exact retribution for our killing of their fellow Muslims.
We are being attacked over here because we are over there.
Nor is it a good sign that US intelligence is reporting that rising numbers of US Muslims are making Internet inquiries about how and where to get training to bring the war home to America.
Open Article On Originating Site
Patrick Buchanan is the author of the book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |










Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Buchanan has written much that is ill informed, with a few exceptions, so I have to wonder why he just now decides to understand the problems of empire.
One criticism of Buchannan. He's obviously not read Qutb but only taken the views of the neo-cons who fabricated another boogieman. Qutb is really a very great philosopher and not anti-american at all. Like Buchanan he hates American imperialism, torture, and cruelty. Qutb sees America as locked into a spiral of torture and death and it does not have the values to reverse itself. That is a true analysis.
Greed and self interest are the defining qualities that make American policy unpopular. 'Empire' is a word that is never used in America to describe itself. It is the only country that refuses to do so. That may explain polar opposites between America and the world.
Bob Dylan
I'm an american. I didn't vote for GWB or his dad the CIA spook. I don't listen to Lady Gaga. Don't wear provocative clothes. I don't support our foreign policies in most situations worldwide. I don't think our economic policies are humane. If I were a foreigner, I wouldn't waste my time trying to blow up America. The Republicans are blowing it to bits from the inside out.
We could simply begin by doing the 3 most important things RIGHT NOW..!
1. TAKE ALL BUT PUBLIC FUNDING OUT OF ELECTIONS.
2. BREAKUP THE FEW MEDIA EMPIRES WHICH NOW CONTROL ALMOST ALL MEDIA ENTERPRISES IN AMERICA-- INTO ITSY BITSY, TEENY WEENY, MEDIA BITS AND PIECES OWNED BY HUNDREDS OF SEPARATE, DIFFERENT, DIVERSE ENTITIES... AND BRING BACK A STRONG FAIRNESS DOCTRINE IN MEDIA WHICH REQUIRES 'TRUTH IN ADVERTISING'.., INCLUDING POLITICAL ADVERTISING...
3. RE-REGULATE ALL THAT IS CORPORATE, END THE 'PERSONHOOD' OF GLOBAL CORPORATIONS AND BREAK UP ALL 'TOO BIG TO FAIL' ANYTHINGS..!
I would modify point number one only to read: Take all but public funding out of elections; allow not a dime of lobby money to ever be turned over to a member of the government or a political party (not even the dinner tab) and, criminalize any possibility of a politician to ever leave public service to then be employed by any lobbying organization or corporate interest with so much as a hint of a political agenda.
What we need is an impenetrable wall between the monied and the politicians.
What is needed is ammendments to the Constitution. What is needed is the organization of the likeminded to a point where boycotting voting and taxation becomes so severe a deterent to ignoring the obligation of our government to be of, by and for the people, that governance is crippled without compliance. The system will ignore us until it is hurt enough to act.
So, let's listen to the Truth! Pull out of the Arab nations, dump Israel and just for fun, give them Lady Gaga.
Peace
Religions are so happy, so good for everyone.
Try to see the last 50 years in that context.
If we, as Americans, as Christians or Jews or Muslims, as Democrats or Republicans, as men or women -- if we could be honest with ourselves, with each other, and with our purported enemies, then the world could begin to heal, and so could we.
The premise above is that America's wars are merely imperial. Iraq/Af-Pak are battles over dwindling planetary resources being fought for bitterly by superpowers far worse than us, even at our worst. Islam is the collateral damage in this scuffle for oil. But it would be far better for the West to win the Oil War than China or Russia.
While America's history of democracy is spotted (btw its empire began long before 1898), China has *no* history of democracy at all, and Russia's is a gang-ridden joke. Why do you think we allied with India? Because we'd like them to have nuclear energy? That alliegance significantly shifts the power balance. India is China's regional enemy.
The totalitarian behemoth fighting us in the Oil War in Af/Pak, Africa, and elsewhere will be orders of magnitude worse as world rulers than America.
RSS feed for comments to this post.