Share
Email This Page
add comment

Bail Out Our Schools

Print
Monday, 08 March 2010 17:00
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)


ny day now, the Obama administration will announce $4.35 billion in extra federal funds for under-performing public schools. That's fine, but relative to the financial squeeze all the nation's public schools now face it's a cruel joke.

The recession has ravaged state and local budgets, most of which aren't allowed to run deficits. That's meant major cuts in public schools and universities, and a giant future deficit in the education of our people.

Across America, schools are laying off thousands of teachers. Classrooms that had contained 20 to 25 students are now crammed with 30 or more. School years have been shortened. Some school districts are moving to four-day school weeks. After-school programs have been canceled; music and art classes, terminated. Even history is being chucked.

Pre-K programs have been shut down. Community colleges are reducing their course offerings and admitting fewer students. Public universities, like the one I teach at, have raised tuitions and fees. That means many qualified students won't be attending.

Last year the nation committed $700 billion to bail out Wall Street banks, the engines of America's financial capital, because we were told we'd face economic Armageddon if we didn't.

We've got our priorities backwards. Our schools are the engines of our human capital, and if we don't bail out public education we face a bigger economic Armageddon years from now.

Financial capital moves instantly around the globe to wherever it can earn the best return. Human capital - the skills and insights of our people - is the one resource that's uniquely American, on which our future living standards uniquely depend.

Starting immediately, the federal government should give states and local governments interest-free loans to make up for all school and university budget shortfalls. The loans can be repaid when the recession is over and local and state tax revenues revive.

Over the longer term we must shift incentives away from financial capital toward human capital. A tiny one half of one percent tax on all financial transactions would generate about $200 billion a year, according to the Economic Policy Institute. That might put a crimp on Wall Street bonuses but it's enough to fund early childhood education, smaller K-12 classes, and lower tuitons and fees for public higher education.

The Street's financial capital is important to the American economy, but over the long term the classroom's human capital is absolutely crucial.


Open Article On Originating Site

Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," and his most recent book, "Supercapitalism." His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+5 # Guest 2010-03-08 22:15
Whoa - so when did any modern politician from either side of the slimy fence (yes, I'm beating on both Republicans and Democrats here) express any interest in "long-term" investment in our country's future?! That noble sentiment went out the window during the Reagan years, to never return. It's all about short term gains to win the next election and/or pay back the lobbyists paying your real salary.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-03-10 10:30
Quoting
Whoa - so when did any modern politician from either side of the slimy fence (yes, I'm beating on both Republicans and Democrats here) express any interest in "long-term" investment in our country's future?! That noble sentiment went out the window during the Reagan years, to never return. It's all about short term gains to win the next election and/or pay back the lobbyists paying your real salary.

Couldn't have said it better! As if throwing more money is going to raise the quality significantly. The NEA has made sure that it won't. All of America is learning how to survive on less. Why should education be the exception?
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-03-10 21:41
Quoting "The Donald"
All of America? Does this include Wall Streeters/Insurance CEOs and most public school superintendents with six-figure salaries?
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-03-08 22:21
Best idea yet. Do not delay! Put money and support into education, and quit supporting unwinnable wars and any other distraction that's not in the best interest of all US citizens and our country. It's keeping our young from climbing to greater heights through education. Ever since Bush 2 gave the impression he supported education with the "No Child Left Behind" failure, then yanked funding, it seemed apparent the plan was to let the US education system flounder. It has and is. Joblessness and the dumbing down of America rises to the top of the list for recruiting current and future soldiers. Not a good outlook.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-03-08 23:22
I thought you might like this!
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-03-08 23:42
I'm stupified. So to the point. It's the human factor.
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-03-08 23:58
30 kids would be nice. I have 37 in one of the high school classes I teach. Dostoevsky wrote, "The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons." Well, a society's commitment to its own future can be seen by entering its schools.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-03-09 01:40
You are absolutely correct Robert!! In Wisconsin the priority is paying for the prisons. When the state allocation for higher education goes down, the allocation for prison goes up. A good education could make the difference between s satisfying life and one in prison.
 
 
-1 # Guest 2010-03-09 02:30
I would recommend reading John Taylor Gatto, voted repeatedly 'best teacher of the year' in New York City, who, after 30 years of teaching ,now advocates against what passes for education in America.He calls for less school, more education. I see for myself, as he does, that American children can barely read or write, know next to nothing about world history or geography, even less about their own country, and have virtually no practical skills whatsoever.Last, but not least-they are incapable of thinking for themselves, and have little imagination.SO- WHAT ON EARTH DO KIDS DO ALL DAY IN SCHOOL THEN? You want to spend more money on results like THIS? It does not make sense. Pouring more money into something that doesn't work in the first place will not magically transform it.Thank you.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-03-09 06:04
More money for schools means:
-- fewer students per teacher, which would allow teachers to apply our knowledge and actually teach instead of warehousing kids and getting these "poor results"
-- access to more up to date curricular materials for every student
-- a broader education for each student (music, art, physical education, etc)
-- so many more things. It's not "throwing money" at a problem -- it's acknowledging that more money would allow us to do things that actually work. Right now we're doing a lot of warehousing and educational triage -- and many kids fall through the cracks.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-03-09 12:33
What do you suggest?
 
 
+5 # Merschrod 2010-03-09 04:24
Yes, go for the 1/2% on financial transactions and let's build for the future.

'd go for the slogan "20 and out" in the sense of more than 20 students in a classroo? then out they go into a new classroom!
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-03-09 05:51
We live in a 'short-term society.' The only long term anythings are wars, Congressional retirements and landfills. Nothing else is sustainable, not our environment, our economy or our education. We do not have any visionaries or futurists, no one to lay out road maps for what must be done in order for this planet to be inhabitable for future generations. We are discinigrating from within and when greed and corruption have finally won the battle for survival we will be the lost colony described on papyrus scrolls for whatever life form may evolve in coming eons.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-03-09 06:30
The problem with American business ideals is that they are all connected with increasing their own bottom line, which means that nothing matters except increasing profits.

That ethic has crept into every other area of American industry. Human capital is totally neglected.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-03-09 07:11
if any one names Ragaun has an example of good government , he has been fooled beyond the biggest liar ever in that office , :little Dumbya :' mcain called him dumber than a stump " he was right then and is still right .. reagan began the financial vulturism that we now face ,,, as for his intelligence , he was a great "USED CAR "salesman and a coverupper
 
 
-1 # Guest 2010-03-09 07:19
The bet is on. Conservatives will try to cancel all efforts to improve our schools. After all, they have succeeded in making half of the nation stupid with phony religious and conservative beliefs. To cover their real hatred for humanity and the poor, they preach anti-abortions themes and even murder pro-choice doctors. They couldn't care less about unwanted children being born only except that they will be used as cannon fodder on future economic wars or fill up the corporate prisons. Is it any wonder why the USA has more young men and women in prison than the rest of the world put together. It's the only other nation in the world that put to death it's children for crimes, but rewards corporate thieves who are in the business of building more prisons?

Their rule of the day is, build more prisons and less schools. After all, there is nothing more rewarding for them than a dumb stupid nation always at war shouting racial words and waving guns at political rallies!
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-03-09 07:39
I received the greatest public school education ever at the Girls' Latin School in Boston. Note the word Girls. If out education system is to survive, we need better trained teachers in the field that they teach, and separation of the genders. Our classes were up to 40 students, but we were there to learn, not gape at each other across the aisle. It's not the size of the class, its the education of the educators, and the removal of distractions.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-03-09 08:49
I'm all for better trained teachers but the gender segregation is a red herring. I don't think that I am stretching to say that "Girl's Latin" was a private school where both the parents and student had a high investment in the quality of the teaching and the school had the option of picking its students. That had a lot more to do with the quality of your education than the gender of your fellow students. I have no problem with a private school telling students what gender they have to be to attend or what they have to wear. The problem is that public school official grab on to dress codes or gender segregation as some sort of panecea, as though it was _the_ secret of private school success.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-03-09 08:00
If the first $650 of every student allocation (federal, state and city) went towards a web-enabled computer device, such as a laptop or ipad, it would save many times that amount in textbooks, xeroxes, projectors and more.

In my school I see palettes of copy paper being delivered every few weeks, to make handouts and notices that are promptly ignored.

The biggest irony is that most of my students already have a web-enabled computer in their pockets - which they are not allowed to use.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-03-09 08:32
We were denied in-school extra help due to a 205% above poverty level of income (cut off was 200% above, I was informed).
It is damaging to children to fall behind and not get the RIGHT HELP. Education should be an at any cost venture, considering the paybacks to all involved. Schools are the last HOPE of 'grass roots' involvement, they are supposably ran by Boards of local connection and hopefully the smarts to make decent decisions. Waste in Education will rear its ugly head and there will be situations, but that is GREED following MONEY, can't rid of it in a FREE Market. But I truly think if the ADEQUATE funds would be put into the Education system of the United States of America, the rewards will benefit the U.S.A.. Take from Nasa, Take from Defense, Take from foreign aid, take from OUR tax-dollars, But put the MONEY on Education.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-03-09 10:26
There's way too much common sense in Mr. Reich's proposals. It'll never happen. As one of the comments stated, the republicans and southern dems aren't interested in educating our children, just keeping them from being able to think for themselves and figuring out that the politicians are complicit in the plot to have 400 ultra-wealthy families run/own everything, while the rest of us beg for jobs and food. Okay, a little extreme, but if we look at the growing income divide, the lack of funding and concern for education and jobs, Wall Street and political greed and, with a little imagination, we can see we're on our way to this scenario.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-03-09 19:40
Forty to fifty kids in a class. Homework assigned every night. No playground time until work was completed o.k., and handed in. Any kid not following directions from teacher was 'timed out' in a corner of the classroom, his/her back to the class. And then there was the rap on the knuckles with a ruler, and bop on the top of the head with a book.
And if a kid got in trouble at school, s/he got in trouble at home. Parents supported schools, and schools supported parents, especially those parents who tried hard to help educated and discipline their kids. This was the m.o. sixty years ago in the private/parochial grade school I attended. And, guess what, we all left grade school better educated than most kids are as they leave high school today.
Please be careful, Obama admin., to not reward poor performance. Instead, reward hard working kids, parents and teachers. And lift the ban on discipline - God knows it's needed.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.