Share
Email This Page
add comment

Iran's Green Movement Held in Check

Print
12 February 2010
Students supporting the government scuffle with pro-democracy students, Tehran, 12/07/09. (photo: Reuters)

Students supporting the government scuffle with pro-democracy students, Tehran, 12/07/09. (photo: Reuters)


How the Iranian Regime Checkmated the Green Dissidents on a Crucial Day

he opposition press in Iran says that former presidential candidate Mir Hosain Musavi attempted to go to Azadi (Freedom) Square in downtown Tehran on the occasion of the commemoration of 31 years of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, but was prevented from doing so by a phalanx of plainclothesmen. Musavi had been prime minister under Imam Ruhollah Khomeini in the late 1980s, but is now marked as a dissident by Khomeini's successor, Ali Khamenei.

In the crowd at Azadi Square, Green Movement supporters who unfurled banners or chanted 'down with the dictator' were said by dissident web site Kalemeh.org to have been swiftly arrested by plainclothesmen stationed in the crowds for this purpose.

Interestingly, the authorities did permit former presidents Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and Mohammad Khatami to attend the huge rally at Azadi Square. Did these two give undertakings that they and their followers would not attempt to use the occasion to promote protests? Why were they treated so differently from Musavi, whom they support?

Musavi's, wife, prominent 'Islamic feminist' leader Zahra Rahnavard, attempted to attend a protest rally at Sadeghieh Square, but she was likewise surrounded by plainclothesmen, who began cursing and beating her. Supporters spirited her away. At Sadeghieh Square itself a small rally was broken up by security forces and plainsclothesmen, who arrested a number of people. AFP quotes opposition sources saying that tear gas and the brandishing of knives were used in the repression. Other rallies of oppositionists were treated with similar brutality.

As this unverified video shows, anti-riot police in full battle gear were also inserted strategically into the crowds:



The Guardian quotes a disheartened dissident: "There were 300 of us, maximum 500. Against 10,000 people," one protester told the Associated Press. "It means they won and we lost. They defeated us. They were able to gather so many people. But this doesn't mean we have been defeated for good. It's a defeat for now. We need time to regroup."

Mehdi Karroubi, another dissident and former presidential candidate, was also stopped by plainclothesmen from reaching Sadeghieh Square, by regime tear gas. He is said to have developed difficulty breathing. He was also hit on the head by a stone cast at him, but was not seriously wounded. His bodyguards are said to have been injured. In an interview, his son describes his father's condition and expresses concern about the whereabouts of his brother (Mehdi Karroubi's other son), Ali. Some say the latter was arrested.

AP reports on the pro-regime rally at Freedom Square on Thursday:



I have to admit puzzlement about the actions of the leadership and rank and file of the Green Movement on Thursday. Musavi, Rahnavard, and Karroubi appeared to think they would be allowed to go to anti-regime rallying sites, and proceeded in public so that they were easily identified and stopped. The demonstrators also appear to have acted predictably, such that the regime was ready for them and successfully broke up the rallies. I have to wonder whether the regime has not managed to insert spies into the informal leadership of the inchoate Green Movement, or tapped their phones or something, because they appear to have have anticipated their every move.

Some Green Movement supporters objected to my characterization of Thursday as a 'failure to mobilize,' saying that I wasn't taking into account the sheer brutality of regime measures. But it is a given that this regime is brutal. It was brutal on Ashura (Dec. 27, 2009), but the Greens nevertheless managed to make an impressive showing, and despite regime foreknowledge that it would be a flash point.

What I would say is that coming off the Ashura protests, the Green Movement had the momentum and the regime was under pressure. The rallies had spread to a number of cities, including conservative ones like Isfahan and Mashhad. The crowds seemed to be turning on Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

After Thursday, the momentum is now with the regime. Either the Revolutionary Guards are getting better at countering the dissidents or movement members are tired of getting beaten up with no measurable political impact. As I said yesterday, the regime blocked the 'flashmobs' by interfering with electronic communication (Google mail, Facebook, Twitter). They also thought strategically about how to control the public space of major cities, resorting to plainclothesmen rather than just uniformed police squads. It is also possible that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's brinkmanship with the West over Iran's civilian nuclear enrichment program is causing the Iranian public to rally to the regime in the face of American, Israeli and European threats.

The Green Movement cannot depend on being able to go on indefinitely mounting big public demonstrations, especially since the cost to the protesters is rising, with beatings, firing of live ammunition, mass arrests and executions. It also cannot continue to depend on informal networks to organize, since these can be fairly easily disrupted.

Mir Hosain Musavi has said he refuses to form a political party. There are such parties or at least vague groupings in Iranian politics (former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani leads one), and they have members of parliament. By refusing to develop a grassroots political organization, Musavi may be making the same mistake as former president Abo'l-Hasan Bani-Sadr, who was toppled from the presidency in summer, 1981, because he declined to seek a mass organization, whereas his enemies had the "Hezbollah" popular militia and the Islamic Republican Party that grouped key hard line clerics. Ahmadinejad has his Alliance of Builders in Tehran, and is backed by the Revolutionary Guards, the Basij paramilitary, and other security forces. Musavi has the little flashmobs who couldn't, at least on Thursday.


Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute.

 

Comments  

 
-1 # Joe Hilbig 2010-02-12 23:58
What a bannana republic! A real democracy would have provided a "free speech" corral far from the action where the protesters could . . . uh . . .

Never mind.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # ana shania 2010-02-15 08:43
There is no democracy in Iran- there never was. Islam or excuse me religion has nothing to do with democracy; its about false rules and dogma. That's what has to die.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # leo 2010-02-13 02:14
Ah these are the same type of HYPED STORIES that was SPIN from KUWAIT ? REMEMBER THE SOBBING GIRL THAT CONNED THE WESTERN MEDIA CONNED, who CLAIMED BEATINGS & TORTURE & KILLINGS OF HER WHOLE FAMILY ??? WHO TURNED OT TO BE THE GRAND DAUGHTER OF THE EMIR ????
then the HYPED WMD's in IRAQ -- we have heard all this BEFORE - OVER & OVER -- to whip up WORLDWIDE SYMPATHY for the SECRET MASSIVE CASH & WEAPONS SUPPORT TO THE OPPOSITION IN IRAN !!!
WHY ARE THEY WESTERN MEDIA SOOOOOOOOO QUIET ABOUT DAILY KILLINGS IN GAZA ???????????????????????????????
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # ana shania 2010-02-15 08:48
I resent your comment. Perhaps you should start traveling and see for yourself. This is no hype. Its real and it will not die. By the way, Iran has the highest number of Jews in Asia-minor after Israel itself. It will do every one good to bring back freedom. Iran is not a Muslim country. They are not Arabs. Education would do every one some good.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3 # Abdullahi Edward2 2010-02-13 02:59
Why is it that nothing positive is EVER said about about the present regime in Iran? It looks very much to me that President Ahmadenijad is getting the same treatment that Castro, Ghaddafi, Mugabe and the late Ayatollah Khomeini got for decades. Is it that the west always has to have a "bad guy" to make it's unrealistic life style more relevant? Or is it just that the west wants war only?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # ana shania 2010-02-15 08:40
This is not about west or East; this is about human rights. This oppressive regime rapes and kills people-takes away their birth right as human beings. Women are bitten and raped and killed. If you are a virgin, they rape you first and then kill you. Why do you defend a monster. I am an Iranian/American woman. I know first hand what is going on in Iran. I left when this oppressive, Islamic regime came to power (with the help of other nations). The truth is that Islam is dated and does not represent me or the people of Iran. We don't want to have anything to do with it. This is only the last remnant of what has to die- forever.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # Hya 2010-02-13 04:14
That´s right, demonstrations have to be funded as in all those colour revolutions. And people round the world continue to fall for the moneymen who seek only their own benefits and interests. The funding stops when the cause no longer serves their interest.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # Jeff 2010-02-13 07:52
I have new respect for the regime in Iran. They have successfully strtegized repression, political public image and suppression of all forms of media communication. Thats e-mail, twitter, facebook, etc. Look at the populated responses to this article, some of which just irrationally supportive of this Irani regime.

Iran plays with the international community with impunity because they believe that their ability for domestic physical suppression, state institutional murder of mid-level opposition (firing squads), ability to spin like a Tea Party" trainer and shatter opposition communications will justify their continued empowerment. The strategy of isolating the top opposition leaders from their supporters is diabilically brilliant. All of this is the very definition of evil.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # john doe 2010-02-13 13:40
no one was concerned about democracy when the SHAH was crushing the opposition, he was instead getting all the support, it's not about democracy people, it's all about power
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # RockyMissouri 2010-02-14 12:46
I am weeping in my heart... and I believe you are right ..... It is the power!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # carol 2010-02-13 20:07
Thank you, Juan Cole, from my UofM Alma Mater. Jeff's and Joe's comments are exactly accurate. Jeff's about Iran regime's brilliant strategy. Joe's about power. The Iranian people are being screwed once again.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote