Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

Ralph Nader writes: "What could start a popular resurgence in this country against the abuses of concentrated, avaricious corporatism? Imagine the arrogance of passing on to already cheated working people and the jobless enormous corporate losses? This is achieved through government bailouts and tax escapes. History teaches us that the spark usually is smaller than expected and of a nature that is wholly unpredictable or even unimaginable. But if the dry tinder is all around, as many deprivations and polls reveal, the spark, no matter how small, can turn into a raging inferno."

Ralph Nader. (photo: Truth Alliance)
Ralph Nader. (photo: Truth Alliance)

go to original article

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+13 # lkach 2011-04-19 22:27
In many countries the rebels will first take over not the president's mansion or parliament building but the radio TV studios.
So maybe Rupert Murdoch should be the target of street demonstrations.
 
 
+11 # giraffee2012 2011-04-19 23:30
The Stupremes had better reconsider their 2010 Decisioon to allow corp to BUY our elections. Their decision is an abortion of the 5th and 14 amendments and although all of the constitution is open to 'interpretation' -- the Stupremes interpretation in 2010 sold the sole of our democracy to the Koch brothers and others who now FUND the GOP + TParty.

Scalia/Thomas MUST make amends NOW or resign. We know you were wined/dined by the Kock brothers b4 making that decision.

Rest of you -- vote in 2012 -- no matter who is on the Democratic ticket -- vote for a Democrat -- the lesser evil if you are a Republican. THE GOP will make us all slaves groveling for a crumb of bread as the Jews did in WWII.
 
 
+3 # giraffee2012 2011-04-19 23:40
The Stupremes allowed big corp to buy our elections--- they are the problem and MUST change that 2010 decision. It is unconstitutiona l and violates MY rights. Scalia/Thomas - you slept with the Kock brothers before making that decision. Repeal that decision and then consider resignattions.

Rest of you vote Democratic in 2012 -- do not not vote. The GOP will make us all slaves hoping for a crumb of bread - just like the Jews in WWII.
 
 
+2 # Gary Ray Pierson 2011-04-20 01:21
Hey Sparky, light a match.. And work around the flames that Three Ring Circus with an elephant mascot and upside down stars on it's patriotic side.. Why have they left them upside down and I'm not religious. Just curious. Cause the one's on our flag point up and as far as I'm concerned, go ahead a burn it.If that's all it takes to piss you off, your not stable any way.. I'd call you a name but I think you'd just get upset... We burn flags of others too and all of em are made in Taiwan. American flag my ass, only a few have one made in America and their good.. Don't burn that one ok?.. If it's old and taterd, take that made in America flag over to the American Legion,all others made some where else, do what ya want. Ok? Burn the cope offs.. Feels like the good ol buy off the cops and judges days again.. Feels good if you have the money or no one pursues you and you walk away.. Since Goldman-Sachs and other banks own the Federal Reserve, the folks who printed up all those pallets of money that went to Iraq, had to be paid in cash over there ya know. If we owe them..And they Ponzi schemed us. How come we have to pay them? We should claim bankruptcy as a Nation and try again.. Yeah, that sounds good at 4 in the morning. Cpl. Pierson, 101st Airborne, Vietnam
 
 
+14 # ritaague 2011-04-20 04:24
So wise you are, and always have been, Ralph Nader - per usual, a brave and determined 'stander upper' for we the sheeple.

Revolution's coming, and all the karlroving MSD (manipultion, spin, distraction) ain't gonna derail it.

Amazing to me, as I stood on Monday outside the downtown Wells Fargo Bank in Colorado Springs, with MoveOn.Org demonstrators lashing out against the non-tax paying corp. giants, how many folks honked and gaves us thumbs up as they drove by.

Not even one Tea Partier came out and shouted in our ears 'til they rang, bopped us on our heads with their stupid beyond belief signs, or yelled they wished they had their guns with them.

Hardly a progressive mecca, even here in this America the Beautiful, super fusion center, the large sign I carried got lots of laughs and words of approval:

BUSHWHACKED and KOCHSUCKED - VILLAINIARES, GO TO HELL!

Yep, revolution's a comin'.
 
 
+14 # rm 2011-04-20 04:33
Good work Ralph. But you are short on details about what people can do. Street protests are not very effective. Government still goes on, as in Wisconsin. The real revolt the American population can carry out is a tax revolt -- simply stop paying federal income tax. If 20 million people did this, the USG could not prosecute them. The tax revolt would need to produce a list of demands that must be met before anyone pay tax again. These would include taking control of banks and investment. The very big banks like Goldman Sachs or Citigroup should be broken up or dismantled completely. The next demand has to be the end of empire. Stop all wars and close all US military bases around the world. The third would be to undo all the laws and court decisions granting "legal personhood" to corporations.

A tax revolt is feasible.
 
 
0 # common sense 2011-04-23 17:43
an IRS incident could well be 'the spark'.

A better question, though, might be what kind of American regime (not be be romantic about it) do we want to take its place?
 
 
+6 # phrixus 2011-04-20 05:24
"How do we break the cycle of despair, exclusion, powerlessness, and endless betrayal...?" Yes, Mr. Nader, how exactly? We are all very much aware of how broken and corrupt our government has become. The seriousness of the situation is analyzed to microscopic depths every day. But no one ever offers any practical solutions - no starting point, however small. Our president (with minor exceptions), has utterly failed to live up to his promises and instead assumes the role of doormat for the radical right-wing GOP extremists and quickly allies himself with the very corporations you so accurately rail against. WHAT DO WE DO?
Signed, "Still waiting for the change."
 
 
0 # common sense 2011-04-23 17:53
Make a national 3rd Party.

Make a top ten list of reforms you'd like your kids to see someday, and don't forget to ask your so-called 'lib' or 'con' friends for their top reforms, too. Any viable national 3P needs to draw pretty much equally from both wings of the establishment... that is if you indeed want something that most people will vote for.

With all respect for Mr. Nader, 20thc 3rd parties were pretty much openly dismissed as 'wingers'. Its high time to get over that.
 
 
+17 # jon 2011-04-20 06:07
move your money to a local credit union and out of commercial banks - that is a simple first step.
 
 
0 # common sense 2011-04-23 17:58
Quoting
move your money to a local credit union and out of commercial banks - that is a simple first step.


Yes; there's no virtue in overlooking the obvious.
“We are so often caught up in our destination that we forget to appreciate the journey, especially the goodness of the people we meet on the way. Appreciation is a wonderful feeling, don't overlook it.”
 
 
+8 # sark 2011-04-20 06:10
It would be nice if the "raging inferno" would get rid of all the electronic voting machines. There is a strong correlation between the increased use of electronic voting machines in elections and the so called "move to the right". Citizens United and new voter ID laws are excellent tools for the hard-right corporate takeover because the religious-right votes on beliefs rather than facts.
I think the situation in this country would be very different if we voted using hand counted paper ballots.
Mr Nader, use your consumer advocate and lawyer skills to address election integrity, please!
 
 
+1 # Ken Hall 2011-04-21 03:56
Sark: Nader and Public Citizen, the advocacy group he founded, are aware of vote hacking and are working to stop it. I see that the fraud of electronic voting machines is a thread that runs through many of your posts, and I completely agree. There are enormous problems with committing one's vote to cyberspace, and turning over vote tabulation to private companies. Verifiable paper ballots and public funding of election campaigns would be an important change, and maybe even bring democracy back to the good ol' US.
 
 
-3 # Jeff 2011-04-20 06:28
Ralph Nader should have crawled into a closet after the 2000 election and never come back out. There was a huge difference then between the candidates. If Al Gore had become president, it is reasonable to say that:

1. We would never have gone into Iraq. Maybe the 9/11 terrorist attacks would have occurred anyway, and maybe we would have retaliated against Al qaeda as we did, but no Iraq.
2. There would have been no huge tax break for the super wealthy.
3. There would have been much stronger government regulation in all areas, especially the environment.
4. There would have been no attempt to privatize Social Security.
5. We would not have the huge deficit we have now.

The list can be much longer. Would things be perfect? No. But if Ralph Nader had thrown his support behind Gore (even if he thought Gore was only the better of two evils), Al Gore would have won decisively, and we would not be in the mess we are today.
 
 
+15 # Glen 2011-04-20 07:19
Al Gore won in spite of Nader. Al Gore, however, was not going to win in the end, due to fraud and illegal maneuvers by the supreme court, et al.

On top of all that, you appear to have much too much confidence in the "power" of the presidency. Obama has proven that both parties are coordinated and that the true power in the country is not in the office of president.
 
 
+4 # Ken Hall 2011-04-21 03:44
Jeff: You are wrong to think it was Nader's fault that Gore wasn't elected. Blaming him is major media's way of neutralizing an important dissident. Check into Greg Palast's "The Best Gov't That Money Can Buy". Florida's governor was the candidate's brother, Florida's secretary of state (responsible for elections) the candidate's campaign manager in the state. There was a lot of skullduggery going on, including a SC where the majority were ideologues rather than jurists. To top off the absurdities, Gore probably did poll higher in Florida. Inform yourself and stop being misdirected into believing it was RN's candidacy that brought us the disaster of the Bush years.
 
 
+4 # Glen 2011-04-20 07:41
You'll notice the examples Nader gives in the article, of sparks that ignite rebellion, are all physical, visible, violent. What would happen in a country this size had there been such an incident in Wisconsin? Of course, police brutality occurs regularly and has resulted in some violent reactions, but what would happen had there been beatings as there were in the sixties, or if someone had been shot? How about if tanks were brought in, with tear gas and military, to run everyone out, as was done to WWI veterans protesting and camping in D.C.?

What would happen today?
 
 
0 # HAVANiceaDay 2011-04-23 18:23
Mil would probably have them all bathed in 'non-lethal weapons technology' (wizard-of-oz-on-steriods fear factor) within 15 minutes.

go figure

They've known about the coming dollar crash for decades.
 
 
-5 # fredboy 2011-04-20 10:24
Nader, the guy who made the nightmare possible, now shares a fix. This would be laughable if it wasn't so tragic.
 
 
+5 # MrBtfsplk 2011-04-21 07:55
Odd, how the effective but reprehensible act of the media's lack of reminding us, that we seem to have forgotten that the military spends far and away the bulk of our economy. This fact is so far from all the discussion and, apparently our thoughts that perhaps we need to start reminding ourselves and others.

Most of the worlds problems could be solved with only what the pentagon cannot account for annually. And why do we pay interest to the Fed, who so successfully manipulates our economy for private gain?

And I believe Eisenhower's speech included Political complicity with Military and the Industrial.
 
 
+1 # Glen 2011-04-21 12:10
Interesting you reminded everyone of Eisenhower's original words: congress. Of course, we often overlook the office of the president, also.
 
 
+1 # sfrider 2011-04-21 19:51
Historically, wars have been the catalyst for revolution when massive numbers of men died fighting for causes in which they did not believe or the cost of supporting a war effort produced intolerable deprivations for the population at large -- the Russian revolution of 1917 being an example of the former, and the French revolution of 1789 one of the latter. However, as the technologies of battle have improved, conventional wars have become much less stressful and costly in human life, at least as developed countries are concerned. So, we are left with economic effect as the sole remaining motivator of serious protest. It remains to be seen if we have reached the point where that will supply the spark in this country.
 
 
0 # Glen 2011-04-22 05:46
Gas prices just might do the trick more quickly than citizens growing impatient with war expenses. That's a little something folks in the past did not have to contend with, along with war and taxes.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.