RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

Resnik writes: "Instead of open proceedings, filings would not be docketed, the courtroom would be closed to the public and the outcome would be secret."

 (photo: CC-BY-SA-3.0/Matt H. Wade/Wikipedia)
(photo: CC-BY-SA-3.0/Matt H. Wade/Wikipedia)


Renting Judges for Secret Rulings

By Judith Resnik, The New York Times

02 March 14

 

SHOULD wealthy litigants be able to rent state judges and courthouses to decide cases in private and keep the results secret?

The answer should be an easy no, but if the judges of Delaware’s Chancery Court persuade the United States Supreme Court to take their case and reverse lower federal court rulings outlawing that practice, corporations will, in Delaware, be able to do just that.

The state has long been a magnet for corporate litigation because of its welcoming tax structures and the court’s business expertise. Yet the State Legislature became concerned that Delaware was losing its “pre-eminence” in corporate litigation to a growing market in private dispute resolution.

go to original article

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+14 # Archie1954 2014-03-02 12:52
"Justice" rendered in secret is no justice at all!
 
 
+8 # bingers 2014-03-02 14:02
There should be no secret trials unless they affect the safety of the Country, and there should be no gag orders on settlements. Whatever payments for wrongdoing there are should be published.
 
 
+5 # JSRaleigh 2014-03-02 16:33
Amendment VII

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, ...
 
 
+4 # rose528 2014-03-02 17:34
another nazi fascist party of NO (repugs) law passed to limit the American people rights
 
 
+2 # Used Name 2014-03-02 23:12
Don't you love the way they use the term "Business expertise" to imply something other than an improbability of consideration for anything other than corporate interests?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN