Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

Excerpt: "Although the war has been pretty much ignored by cable news and much of the rest of the mainstream media, apparently the American people have a different view. Around the country, local papers and television stations as well as NPR told the story of its human cost in interviews with survivors of dead servicemen and servicewomen and with stories about the wounded survivors."

A soldier stands guard outside an Iraqi brick factory, 05/05/05. (photo: Staff Sgt. Russell Klika/US Army)
A soldier stands guard outside an Iraqi brick factory, 05/05/05. (photo: Staff Sgt. Russell Klika/US Army)

go to original article

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+6 # Activista 2011-06-26 17:15
Again true cost of wars is OVER 3 trillion and growing. Well documented and more trustable than Pentagon/Obama propaganda:
The true cost of the Iraq war: $3 trillion and beyond
Sep 5, 2010 – Writing in these pages in early 2008, we put the total cost to the United States of the Iraq war at $3 trillion. This price tag dwarfed ...
 
 
+1 # rm 2011-06-28 03:09
It is good to see such general acknowledgement that the US population and, indeed, the whole world is tired and against the GWOT or "Long War" as its was renamed in 2006. The Neo-cons (inc. Obama) are totally committed to seeing this war continue for generations. They have lots of nations on their list that they believe still need "regime change."

The key policy articulated in Cheney's Defense Strategy of the 1990s (when he as Bush I's Sec Def) was a move to a "force based US foreign policy." Don't deal with nations in negotiations -- war must be the first move. Preventative wars.

It is this policy that needs to be changed. It needs to be debated openly. The US has a force based foreign policy now. A lot of the force is covert -- CIA and Pentagon Special Ops. The use of drones is growing. Pulling 33k soldiers out of Afghanistan is a meaningless gesture. Obama needs to announce a 180 degree turn from the force based foreign policy. But in his 2010 National Defense Strategy doctrine, he re-affirmed it although his language was much softer than Bush's. He stopped using the terms war and force and instead used "overseas contingency operations." We were not fooled. We've all read Orwell and we understand political speech. We also know to judge politicians by what they do and not what they say.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.