Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

Excerpt: "The covers of the US edition of this week's Time Magazine compared to the international editions. We can't make this stuff up. It kind of says it all ..."

Time Warner corporate headquarters in New York City. (photo: Chermayeff & Geismar Inc.)
Time Warner corporate headquarters in New York City. (photo: Chermayeff & Geismar Inc.)

go to original article

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+43 # punk 2011-11-28 13:45
i'm wondering if the CONTENTS are the same.
 
 
+63 # Banichi 2011-11-28 14:54
It would be very interesting to know, wouldn't it?

Otherwise Time seems to be aligning itself with the campaign to keep Americans stupid, watching bowl games on TV, and shopping until they drop. White noise...
 
 
+17 # AndreM5 2011-11-29 07:57
Not stupid, ignorant. Stupid is inability to understand or recognize facts, ignorance is the absence of facts. The corporate media including Time promote the latter. The title writer for this link does not know the difference?
 
 
+1 # Duster 2011-11-30 18:27
Probably not. I was in Israel in 2,000 when the Israeli Army moved out of Lebanon over night and the talks with Israeli Palestinians broke down. A rabbi asserted that the 6 million Jews killed by the Nazis were sinners sent back to suffer. It shocked the citizenry - Jewish and Arab - so much that it probably staved off an election for months. It completely displaced both the Army's action and the breakdown of talks in Israel. When I got home, no one had heard of it. For years this story could not be found outside Israel. It can now with a simple Google search. The MSM seems to be very choosy about what its reader and watcher -ship is exposed to.
 
 
+56 # AMLLLLL 2011-11-28 13:46
Oh goodie, cartoons!
...as long as we keep up the fight; show these desparities, expose the lies, whistleblow, we have a fighting chance. Thank you Common Dreams.
 
 
+52 # stan van houcke 2011-11-28 14:04
the usa is hooked on anxiety. without anxiety it can not live. the citizens have to remain mobilized all the time, otherwise the system will collapse. therefore the population is not able to stand back and think about what is going on. in europe we are still able to contemplate what is going on, although also we are becoming more and more anxiety-junkies. keep the anxiety strong and one can dominate the masses.
 
 
+11 # Adoregon 2011-11-29 10:44
Anxiety and ambivalence are the two words emblematic of life in the U.S. today.
 
 
+11 # jamminon 2011-11-28 14:06
The contents are probably the same.

Why? Look in the upper left corner of each cover. The American cover says "Egypt: Revolution Reignited", while the other editions say "Relax! Anxiety is good for you".
 
 
+44 # James Klimaski 2011-11-28 14:07
Where is Egypt? Why should I care? Why aren't there any pyramids in the picture? It can't be Egypt? Anyway, who cares? I'm not going there anytime soon. Don't I need a passport to go there? He doesn't look too friendly, I think I'll definitely stay home. What does my shrink think about this?
 
 
+19 # Bluesguy 2011-11-28 18:43
Quoting
Where is Egypt? Why should I care? Why aren't there any pyramids in the picture? It can't be Egypt? Anyway, who cares? I'm not going there anytime soon. Don't I need a passport to go there? He doesn't look too friendly, I think I'll definitely stay home. What does my shrink think about this?

Hahahahahaha; that's the best of many funny comments here (we sure as hell need some of that, eh?)
Another one was M. P. saying, after he read one of the more troubling stories here : Now that I realize what i see on my screen is actually real, I'm going to turn it off, and "lay my head on my desk" for a while.
Anyway, thanks for your perfect illustration; a possible addition would be: "Do they have a WalMart there ?"
(related history note:check out "The Looting of the Bagdad Museum")
Good luck to all in the tough times ahead; we may have to just peacefully, patiently, naturally outlive 'em; there will be defectors, including their heirs. We can hope for the next generation, at the very least.

"Strive on with diligence."
 
 
-2 # Pickwicky 2011-12-01 08:52
Bluesguy--wish you had ended by saying: get out the vote for Obama. The Republicans have no intention of raising America's level of good education.
 
 
+79 # tm7devils 2011-11-28 14:19
WJM wrote: "Yeah, Time is KNOWN to be a liberal magazine, so it's clearly the liberal press that is guilty here..."

Liberal??? Methinks thou dos't not know the difference between "liberal" and "conservative"
The only way Time could be called liberal is when it had the word in a title on the front page!
Cover to cover it's a republican rag!
As the cover pic of the latest edition shows, its aim is to keep you uninformed and placated...just the way they want their electorate.
 
 
+62 # cadan 2011-11-28 14:23
Time Magazine certainly has a history of not just pretending to report the news but of trying to steer it. After all, they chose (against the polling choice of their readership) the head of Facebook for their person-of-the-year instead of Julian Assange.
 
 
+78 # MidwestTom 2011-11-28 14:29
This while the US Senate, controlled by our party, is voting on a bill this week to declare the United States a war zone, so they can arrest and jail without charges anyone they feel like. Turn off AMERICAN IDLE, and GET INTO THE STREETS before it is too late.
 
 
-21 # BobbyLip 2011-11-28 14:42
"It kind of says it all."
In fact, it doesn't. You decry dumbing down while you indulge in it. You don't get people to wise up by telling them how dumb they are but by telling them something interesting. I'd say "nice try," but it was just snark.
 
 
+16 # mwd870 2011-11-28 18:31
Snark is often necessary.
 
 
+5 # Glen 2011-11-28 14:44
Subjects listed on the cover tell you there are subjects included in the issue, including Egypt, but not Oscar Night, for the U.S.

Years ago, when traveling I noticed different covers for different sections of the U.S. That was also true of Newsweek.

I'm not so sure that means Americans are dumb because of it. If they are dumb, it is because of their education or lack thereof, social issues, poverty, etc. That has nothing to do with Time Magazine.
 
 
+18 # Byronator 2011-11-28 15:24
And do people who lack education and are handicapped by social issues and poverty plunk down dollars (and the energy it takes to stay focused for more than 15 seconds) to read Time? Doubtful that this sector is Time's target market. Maybe it's aiming at the stupid, greedy thugs who control Wall Street?
 
 
+2 # Glen 2011-11-29 15:41
Education, Byronator, means more than just elementary instruction. "This sector" is thousands of Americans. However, education has nothing to do with intelligence.

Do you actually think anyone on Wall Street reads Time? Truly? And do we actually base American mentality on Time magazine? No, we do not. That magazine's editors do the decision making.

It is ridiculous to base mentality on a magazine's choice of cover.
 
 
+41 # Magars 2011-11-28 14:48
This reminds me when American press accused former Soviet Union Of communist desinformation.,which was absolutely the truth,but my question is What happened to the "free press here?!
 
 
+51 # pernsey 2011-11-28 15:22
Quoting
This reminds me when American press accused former Soviet Union Of communist desinformation.,which was absolutely the truth,but my question is What happened to the "free press here?!


The 1% got a hold of it, thats what happened to it here.
 
 
+28 # Interested Observer 2011-11-28 15:53
Nothing happened. The press is only free for whoever that owns it. The corporate media owns most of the channels (press equivalents as well as actual presses) and the results are what one might expect. This is not new. Read what George Seldes had to say about the "free press" from his early career.
 
 
+10 # Magars 2011-11-28 19:32
Quoting
Nothing happened. The press is only free for whoever that owns it. The corporate media owns most of the channels (press equivalents as well as actual presses) and the results are what one might expect. This is not new. Read what George Seldes had to say about the "free press" from his early career.

Oh!, you are absolutely right? Free is an relative concept,always could be limited by human point of view or consideration,t hat's why I used quotes. Oops I missed the one at the end. But seriously ,years ago,or long time ago was better,because there were less media monopolies.
 
 
+19 # redjelly39 2011-11-28 21:51
In 1983, 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the U.S. At the time, Ben Bagdikian was called "alarmist" for pointing this out in his book, The Media Monopoly. In his 4th edition, published in 1992, he wrote "in the U.S., fewer than two dozen of these extraordinary creatures own and operate 90% of the mass media" -- controlling almost all of America's newspapers, magazines, TV and radio stations, books, records, movies, videos, wire services and photo agencies. He predicted then that eventually this number would fall to about half a dozen companies. This was greeted with skepticism at the time. When the 6th edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 2000, the number had fallen to six. Since then, there have been more mergers and the scope has expanded to include new media like the Internet market.

In 2004, Bagdikian's revised and expanded book, The New Media Monopoly, shows that only 5 huge corporations -- Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch's News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) -- now control most of the media industry in the U.S. General Electric's (Comcast) NBC is a close sixth.
 
 
+22 # X Dane 2011-11-28 19:55
The press was bought by right wingers years ago. News papers AND TV stations.
Which is why I have mentioned several times here, that we need wealthy democrats and progressives, to aquire news media too, both TV statins (or better yet networks) and papers.
 
 
0 # pernsey 2011-12-01 09:22
Quoting
The press was bought by right wingers years ago. News papers AND TV stations.
Which is why I have mentioned several times here, that we need wealthy democrats and progressives, to aquire news media too, both TV statins (or better yet networks) and papers.


I agree the right wingers love to talk about the liberal media, there is so little liberal mainstream media left...I think most of the time they are just saying that because they dont like what someone said. The right wingers have high-jacked our media, so we cant get much straight forward news without the right leaning spin. Thats why so many Americans are duped into believing the GOP. Good little sheeple do what they are told.
 
 
+20 # seeuingoa 2011-11-28 15:34
And the worst part is that you just
can“t fix stupid.
 
 
+10 # Gnome de Pluehm 2011-11-28 15:37
@Glen

"Years ago, when traveling I noticed different covers for different sections of the U.S. That was also true of Newsweek.

I'm not so sure that means Americans are dumb because of it. If they are dumb, it is because of their education or lack thereof, social issues, poverty, etc. That has nothing to do with Time Magazine."

Thee magazines recognized the truth of our separate backgrounds. Read "American Nations; a history of the eleven...."
 
 
+15 # pernsey 2011-11-28 17:40
Quoting
@Glen

"Years ago, when traveling I noticed different covers for different sections of the U.S. That was also true of Newsweek.

I'm not so sure that means Americans are dumb because of it. If they are dumb, it is because of their education or lack thereof, social issues, poverty, etc. That has nothing to do with Time Magazine."

Thee magazines recognized the truth of our separate backgrounds. Read "American Nations; a history of the eleven...."


I agree we arent dumb, we are not seeing the real news, and then they tell us our anxiety is good for us OH PUH-LEASE!!! What a load of cow pies!

You know the 1% controls what we see and what we dont, so it means they are at fault not us people.

I dont buy magazines. I get the real news online from RSN.
 
 
+26 # cordleycoit 2011-11-28 15:42
Time like the rest of the Mainstream Press are carefully pulling the wool over the stupid sheep's eyes: lest they are disturbed by current events.
 
 
+19 # lionsdenmother 2011-11-28 15:43
the magazine is about sales they print on the cover what they think people will pick up and maybe buy. they are about making money first then about placating the corporate powers in this instance ? Me Thinks.
 
 
+8 # X Dane 2011-11-28 20:04
lionsdenmother, I think you are right. Many people seeing.... what they think could be a terrorrist... might think,... UGH I have enough problems, I don't want to read about "THOSE" people. A pretty woman on the cover sells many more magazines.
 
 
+2 # Pickwicky 2011-12-01 08:54
X Dane--and that should tell you how dumb Americans are!
 
 
+19 # TheCoyote 2011-11-28 15:49
Now, everyone, guess what other lies we've been made to swallow!!! If you don't use the Internet to read the foreign press (foreign to America that is) then you deserve to be fooled, lied to and misled. Now go look at the other lies and coverups: the money that the Obama administration SECRETLY gave to the big banksters, the Homeland Security briefing of big city mayors on how to attack the Occupy Movement, Obama's plan for preventive detention of anyone deemed likely to harm the USA. Goodbye to Democracy, good bye to the Constitution.
 
 
+21 # oakes721 2011-11-28 16:01
Isn't that robin's egg blue? Why, I do believe it IS a robin's egg blue on the cover of that magazine. And, I mean, what's NOT to like about robin's egg blue? Such a calming sort of color it is. Oh, some may call it SKY blue, but I guess it's just that freedom of choice that they like to talk about. Those other books all have the 'R' word on them. We don't like to use that word around here. I tell you, our forefathers didn't just fight a war so that we could use THAT kind of language around here!
 
 
0 # Pickwicky 2011-12-01 09:12
Oakes-you're right! That tint of blue is very soothing in the crapper.
 
 
+22 # wwway 2011-11-28 16:22
A friend of my neice writes for Hollywood. she is told that everything must be written to appeal to the 8th grade level.
Susan Jacoby's latest book, The Age of American Unreason, is about how more than a century of anti-intillectualism has affected American intillegence. Neil Postman wrote Amusing Ourselves to Death about how public discourse has been dumbed down in the age of show business.
Look, Americans love sleeze and politicians who lie to them. The more selacious the better. They love it when Republicans call them lazy, godless, homophopes who don't deserve Social Secuirty, medical care or an education. It's like they love to flog themselves without question.
The American edition of TIME woudn't sell with the word "REDUX" on the cover. Americans don't know what that word means.
 
 
+6 # glennwarne 2011-11-28 23:47
Most T.V. Programs are for a 4th grade vocabulary....so Hollywood is a little higher educated.lolol.
 
 
+11 # futhark 2011-11-29 04:23
As a now retired high school teacher, I can say that the anti-intellectual "n-word", which rhymes with "word", has wreaked havoc on a whole generations of American adolescent males. Thanks a lot, Dr. Suess! It was particularly bad during the Reagan years, when being "too smart" was a distinct social liability. I saw many bright and talented teenage boys commit academic suicide to avoid the "n" label. All during those years, teachers were continually pestered about how to make math and science female friendly. My response was "Say what?" Almost all my higher achieving students were female. Now we are reaping the bitter harvest, where most college students are female and medical schools are especially overwhelmingly so.

Mind you, I have no problem with women achieving their potential and being justly rewarded for it. However, we need to address the problem of anti-intellectual bullying in schools and media with the same seriousness that has been recently applied to anti-gay bullying.
 
 
+21 # fredboy 2011-11-28 16:32
No surprises. Just before I left my reporting job at a major newspaper we were told "No more consumer stories" and instead told to embrace "community journalism"--involving readers and officials to shape story outcomes. The the paper became slop.

Welcome to dumb dumb land...
 
 
+3 # X Dane 2011-11-28 20:09
just curious fredboy, what does a reporter do when leaving the profession?
 
 
+2 # glennwarne 2011-11-28 23:50
Pack their thesaurus. and leave the back way.
 
 
+10 # Timaloha 2011-11-28 16:34
I don't think it's a big conspiracy. Time just knows that they can sell more magazines in the US with the anxiety cover than they would with the Egypt cover. Capitalism, nothing more.
 
 
+13 # wwway 2011-11-28 16:35
Anxiety is GOOD FOR YOU? I can see how the 1% could convince the 99% of that. Herman Cain said "You want a job don't you?"
 
 
+12 # Capn Canard 2011-11-28 16:44
I am not surprised at all. I remember back in the 1980s and after I had a class on Critical Thinking all news on TV and most in Newsprint seemed to be nothing more than propaganda. Lately the Network news has all but devolved to mind numbing ca-ca. I used to tell most friends about this but most just dismiss it out of hand. I guess most people are glad to be dumbed down.
 
 
+8 # futhark 2011-11-29 04:05
Remember how, during all the "Gulf Wars", "embedded" journalism was celebrated in the Manipulated Mainstream Media? To my mind, that was the low point in American journalism.
 
 
+5 # Capn Canard 2011-11-29 07:30
futhark, sure! Back in '91, that was the straw that broke the back of unbiased, fair, believable journalism. The last I could trust war reporting was when Anne Garrells an NPR reporter stayed in Baghdad during the 2003 Iraq War without being embedded. And since we haven't had an unbiased view of what is happening. But now even NPR has made friends with the evil Empire. So the information we do get is tainted. Hey, perhaps you could write a book: How to turn a 1st world country into a 3rd world cesspool by suppressing distribution of new and current information...
 
 
0 # Pickwicky 2011-12-01 08:57
Pickwicky confesses, groaning loudly, that my own dear Mother justifies her statements by saying: "Well, it was on TV!"
 
 
+18 # futhark 2011-11-28 17:18
Time and Newsweek have always been mouthpieces for plutocratic propaganda. They can be amusing to read, as long as on keeps in mind that what is being sold to the public is propaganda, not news.
 
 
+7 # anarchteacher 2011-11-28 20:37
Excellent observation. futhark is exactly correct.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/44993.html

"Time Magazine and the Worship of Power"

Read the brief piece at the above link which traces Henry Luce and Time's sordid history from the beginning.
 
 
+10 # capnDave 2011-11-28 17:23
It is the same with Hollywood. They will make an explicit sex
version for overseas and an expurgated version for here. We
are becoming victims of our own propaganda.
 
 
+8 # Bodiotoo 2011-11-28 19:13
One might have expected to see the Davis Students being assaulted...so all of America could have seen the how "endangered" the Storm Troopers were.
 
 
+6 # Bodiotoo 2011-11-28 19:14
I am sending the edition back to TIME and will await thier response.
 
 
+12 # humanmancalvin 2011-11-28 19:27
Well lets see what America has for proof of being dumbed down on the identity scale: poor & middle class citizens that vote Republican. Now how in this age of so much information being at ones fingertips can one ignore facts a key stroke away and vote against ones own self interest? Gotta be a dumbing down going down. How else would one explain it outside of mass mind control but that just sounds too paranoid tin foil hat nutty.
 
 
+3 # mitchell donian 2011-11-28 19:37
But we are getting smarter.
 
 
+11 # fbelcast 2011-11-28 20:05
We are not stupid but ignorant. The corporate media is controlled by seven major corporations who are conservative and censor the news so there is much information that is not presented to the public, This cover is an example.
 
 
+5 # redjelly39 2011-11-28 21:55
Actually , its 5.5 - Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch's News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) -- now control most of the media industry in the U.S. General Electric's (Comcast) NBC is a close sixth.
 
 
+9 # Joan Manning 2011-11-28 20:24
I think it has to do with profit. Appealing to the lowest common denominator to avoid appearing "elite" sells more magazines, just like more sex and violence sells more movies. You don't find Shakespeare at the movie house anymore, and the great radio newsmen are long gone.
 
 
+18 # James Marcus 2011-11-28 20:25
Yes. Time to OCCUPY THE MAJOR MEDIA!
That is, refuse to buy, listen to, or even read, any of that Garbage.
 
 
+8 # William Bjornson 2011-11-28 23:17
Great idea, James, except you would have to recruit the majority of Americans to such an action. How would you reach them? Via the Media? And would they even care? Bernays in his book "Propaganda" (Goebbels' bible and no doubt murdoch too) says you don't lie so much as build an entire false reality. That kind of 'reality' rules America now. OWS is a tiny minority. It may be that we will have to be reduced to complete serfdom before most Americans get the 'message'. Truth has no real voice here. RSN is just the choir, the usual suspects and 'malcontents'. And America so loves Authority and mindless sportsitainment , no thinking required. How does anything penetrate that? We seem to be short of even one genius in this area. sigh
 
 
-15 # glennwarne 2011-11-28 23:27
I wonder where the elitist were hiding, now I know, there here passing judgement on the masses that they feel so superior to.
My god, you people should take some of your own advise! Maybe big brother is just letting you think that the America people don't know anything. I wonder if any of you have worked for a living or are you still living with mom plotting dark deeds in the attic like in High school. Get of your but's and help people to be educated. What will hou do if it all falls apart??? You can't eat mom's Cheerios forever.
 
 
+1 # Bluesyinohio 2011-12-04 08:06
Quoting
I wonder where the elitist were hiding, now I know, there here passing judgement on the masses that they feel so superior to.
My god, you people should take some of your own advise! Maybe big brother is just letting you think that the America people don't know anything. I wonder if any of you have worked for a living or are you still living with mom plotting dark deeds in the attic like in High school. Get of your but's and help people to be educated. What will hou do if it all falls apart??? You can't eat mom's Cheerios forever.

I know you think all responders are young,but I am 62 and retired. I have been watching the "dumbing down" of news outlets for over 45 yrs. Don't you think it is time you stop restating the same old rhetoric about those who disagree w/ the right wing agenda? Time to open your own eyes as to how they are using you. Wake Up! Don't be a troll for them. Use your own intellectual processes.
 
 
+5 # swissms 2011-11-28 23:38
I would love to hear Time's response to the question of why they used different covers. The answer might have more to do with rights to use the picture (aka internationally divvying up the corporate pie). There are many media items that I am not allowed to see over here in Switzerland because of some kind of copyright control. Very frustrating. Information should be free for all.
 
 
+10 # moby doug 2011-11-29 01:27
Of course Time, founded by Republican plutocrat Henry Luce, has always been a deeply conservative rag. Those of us who are old enough remember, for example, how it pushed for America's descent into the quagmire of Vietnam. But who even reads these news magazines any more? They are faded ghosts of their former selves.
 
 
-2 # Sandy G 2011-11-29 06:38
WJM: 'O' Here's an ass. 'O' Here'a a hole in the ground.
Now, tell me which is which.
 
 
+5 # Pufferly 2011-11-29 07:57
Who says we're dumbed down? Studies show we're 3 IQ points HIGHER than a box of kitty litter.
 
 
+4 # Pufferly 2011-11-29 07:59
Good thoughts from many of you, but PLEASE work on your spelling.
 
 
+6 # RicKelis 2011-11-29 11:45
Ironically, there is a more direct link between anxiety and stupidity. Relatively speaking, anxiety is a better emotional state than chronic fear/paranoia--but both are very poor realities; the decisions that are made are reactive rather than proactive--both states yielding the appearance of stupidity. The powers that be have actively promoted these states for quite a while--it's a control mechanism based on the notion of "if you can't get them to love you and respect you, get them to fear you" to get the desired fealty. Fear has pervaded the polity; we have a Congress--both houses, both parties--that is scared to death (or playing dead like an animal does to avoid further attacks), resulting in inaction--they are frozen by the fear . Remedy? This is the remedy, what we, me and thee, are doing here and now--get the word out, use facts and logic. We have the rapid communication channels to do it. We can achieve a "well-informed electorate" that will aid in our quest for a true democracy--as Thomas Jefferson pointed out two centuries ago.
 
 
+4 # badbenski 2011-11-29 16:18
Our media is owned and operated by the 1% so why should we expect it to reflect items that are helpful to the enlightenment of the 99%? We're getting the mushroom treatment (look it up).
 
 
0 # Pickwicky 2011-12-01 08:58
badbenski--are you referring to the thick covering of manure?
 
 
0 # CalmApparatus 2011-12-01 11:48
The American government and establishment are drawing lines as I type this. Legislation has been passed to quell the social unrest and silence dissent. It is going to be a rude awakening for the many who had did anticipate that this yes, it can happen in America.

I give you to you--
American Epitaph: By Damien Darby
 
 
+1 # James Marcus 2011-12-02 10:38
Yes, 'The Media',... is ALL 'Editorial'. Virtually-Owned by the .01%, it has served their propaganda needs with excellence. Naive America was quite unaware, while pursuing 'The American Dream, credit-card financed consumption-for-fun, of the nature of The Crime-In-Process.
Wake-up call!
No more credit, no more jobs! Major Inflation.
But, at last, Exposure. The pants of the 1% are down, if you care to look. (Not in their Media)
But, it is all so unbelievably heinous, including, not only 'bail-outs, but all the Wars-for-Nothing (except to spend-the-money, without the usual oversight, debate, and discretion ..... it wouldn't be Patriotic to hesitate), that, indeed, many decent folks are reluctant to consider the unfathomable, but now obvious, Truth
 
 
+2 # Pipester 2011-12-03 12:46
It's not just TIME. 10,000 people demonstrate in Tahir Square and it's a front page picture in the N.Y. Times. 30,000 demonstrate in Madison, WI, and nothing. The media are in business to make money by keeping their advertisers happy. They would dump all their newspapers in a land fill if they could keep the advertisers writing checks.l
 
 
0 # ATN 2011-12-03 17:37
" TIME" for subscribers of Time magazine to cancel their subscription to the magazine, to show the owner and shareholders of Time magazine, the subscribers pen is still mighteir than the sword - example; [x] cancel my subscripton membership.
I am asking all RSN Commuity members, if you are subscribers to Time magazine, " CANCEL YOUR SUBSCRIPTION ".
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.