Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

As the pressure built in the wellhead far beneath the surface, a life and death debate raged onboard the doomed rig. A BP official made the final call.

The Deepwater Horizon burning in the Gulf of Mexico, 04/22/10. (photo: Jon T. Fritz/MCT)
The Deepwater Horizon burning in the Gulf of Mexico, 04/22/10. (photo: Jon T. Fritz/MCT)

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+22 # Guest 2010-05-26 21:57
Let's not forget that this arrogance also resulted in 11 deaths. Now, in addition to those human deaths, we have the probable death of sensitive, beautiful marshlands and the wildlife that breeds there. The arrogance so characteristic of BP managers is now criminal negligence and homicide. And this is not their first such horror -- there were 15 unnecessary deaths in a land-based explosion resulting from that same pattern of arrogance.
 
 
+24 # Guest 2010-05-26 22:37
We environmentalis ts have been trying to tell the government for years not to drill in the coastal waters, they didnt listen and called us radicals. Now look what their greed has caused. The Gulf is going to be destroyed and the beaches ruined not to mention all the wildlife and birds that will die. This has to stop and now. Im refering to drilling in the coastal waters. All life on this planet depends on the coastal waters and ocean for survival & without it we will all die. What about that doesnt the government understand? WE ALL WILL DIE.
 
 
-6 # Guest 2010-05-27 12:42
Yes, but you environmentalis ts have also prevented the building of new nuclear power plants, which would have made us less dependent on oil, both foreign and domestic. There would have been no desperate need to drill in coastal waters. You want to rely on solar and wind power but those technologies do not exist to supply the amounts of energy necessary. When they do then we should move in that direction. In the meantime environmentalis ts have to deal within the realms of reality, not just in the way they wish things could be.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-05-27 20:33
Quoting
Yes, but you environmentalis ts have also prevented the building of new nuclear power plants, which would have made us less dependent on oil, both foreign and domestic. There would have been no desperate need to drill in coastal waters. You want to rely on solar and wind power but those technologies do not exist to supply the amounts of energy necessary. When they do then we should move in that direction. In the meantime environmentalis ts have to deal within the realms of reality, not just in the way they wish things could be.


How can you propose going from bad to worse? You evidently are unaware of biofuels...and I don't mean ethonol from corn, but rather, ethonol from kelp, switch grass, lawn clippings, raked leaves...literally any plant with celluolose in it, being available abundantly and cheaply...the manufacture of which has been heavily lobbied against by big oil. We don't need nuclear and never did.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-05-28 08:40
You think a drilling 'accident' (eventuality) is bad... ever heard of the 'China Syndrome' or 'Murphy's Law'? Is this the legacy that you want to leave the Seventh Generation. I think that we've left them enough problems already. By the way, did you hear of an acceptable way to deal with the waste? I haven't. Thanks for showing us "Environmentalis ts" more "Conservative" shallow thinking.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-05-28 12:27
Had we followed Carter's energy independence plans, our needs today for energy from foreign sources would be 20% and declining (and no wars in Iraq and Afghanistan). The infrastructure would be in place and solar and wind would be viable sources. Face it, our government is controlled by large industries such as oil and they're going to resist any moves towards more earth friendly solutions when huge profits are there to be made.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-05-29 12:58
You are conveniently ignoring that the US only has 3% of the world's oil reserves and no amount of new nuclear power will increase that. There is no reason to keep attempting to reach the remainder of that 3%, certainly not at the expense of the Gulf of Mexico. If we had access to the entire amount now, it would hardly make any difference. Also, nuclear isn't without its own set of hazards, as we learned from Three Mile Island.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-06-01 15:07
Oh Please!
The oil and gas industry would still be going hell bent on their profits now pace. Any dialogue about nuclear power is such utter nonsense without a conversation about non toxic renewal energy. The sad fact is, as more people come off the grid the profits of large corporations will dwindle - and that's the fact, Jack. Any moron american with a fifth grade education can figure that out. Any other people discussion options without that are mouthpieces.
 
 
+26 # Guest 2010-05-27 00:38
I'm hoping this is a wake-up call to the Obama administration! If they don't take steps to end all deep water wells from operating, and deny any new wells to be drilled at all, anywhere! If not, then at least make the oil co.'s prove they have the means to stop any kind of blow-out at the depth they intend to work BEFORE they are granted permits to drill. We must move to alternative, sustainable sources of energy NOW! At the beginning of WWII, American heavy industry completely shut down what was going on, and re-tooled their entire operations for the war effort in amazingly short period of time! That is exactly what America needs to do now. We are in every bit as much impending peril now as we were then, if not more, and I believe that we can, and absolutely must do this. There is so much idle machinery and out of work manufacturing labor to make it work. All we need is Obama to declare a national state of emergency, and like F.D.R., order mfg. sector to build alternative power.Oh,YES WE CAN!
 
 
+16 # Guest 2010-05-27 06:45
Outstanding post, UnclePurple! However, I disagree with your third sentence: if we leave the door open for the oil companies to "prove" they can handle any crisis, then we invite more of exactly the same corruption we now see. Shut down drilling, period. Done. NOW. And yes, declaration of a national emergency and getting REAL progress on the clean-up and on alternative energy would be a godsend.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-05-27 09:30
Obama is no FDR. All indications are that the administration STILL doesn't get it. Drilling permits AND environmental waivers are merrily being issued just as before even after the BP explosion, inspite of Obama's assurances to the contrary.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-05-28 05:54
[quote name="UnclePurple"]At the beginning of WWII, American heavy industry completely shut down what was going on, and re-tooled their entire operations for the war effort in amazingly short period of time! That is exactly what America needs to do now. quote]
Unfortunatly U.P., We don't have that Machinery,( to re-Tool) any longer. We moved tens of Thousands of Truck Loads of our Manufacturing Machinery in the N.E ,(during the Eightys) and Shipped it all to Lorado Texas, where it was loaded onto Mexican Trucks. Ultimatly destination,(Go d knows where)!
We have plenty of "Hamburger Flippers" though,just not enough people who can afford to buy them..........
 
 
+11 # Guest 2010-05-27 01:25
The 60 Minutes story, eleven days ago, featured a whistleblower who testified as to many drilling procedures ordered by BP that were unnecessarily risky. They were anxious to get the well completed, no doubt so they could make the announcement that would be guaranteed to substantially increase their stock prices. The few tens of millions that they might have saved by proceeding less cautiously couldn't have been their only motivation for throwing caution to the winds.
 
 
+21 # Guest 2010-05-27 01:36
Nothing in the article about the name of the BP officil who made the call to remove the heavy mud nor the reasoning behind it. We'll find out in the investigations, and civil ddamages and wrongful death trials to come. About the latter; I hope the families of the dead and those making "legitimate claims" don't settle out of court. Let the whole world see what fear and blind greed can accomplish. Let everyone see how the "unregulated free market" is better for everyone.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-05-27 08:16
60 Minutes should continue with the interview with the whistleblower. Thom Hartmann has discussed on his radio show the fact that BP had flown in executives for a celebratory party on the rig and there was a rush to complete drilling and get the rig ready for the arrival of the big-wigs. Hence, shortcuts, dangerous actions, catastrophe (deaths, injuries, and massive crude oil release).
 
 
+18 # cabotool 2010-05-27 01:51
If necessary we need a Constitutional amendment to seize BP's assets in the US to pay for all expected costs of their mistakes that led to the release of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

We must also stop ALL offshore oil well drilling.

We must also take all possible steps to reduce our consumption of energy in all forms. This is coal, oil, natural gas and nuclear power.

Without immediate action, in my opinion, life on earth for humans is doomed.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-05-27 14:15
Don't need a constitutional amendment. Obama can declare this a federal crime scene, which it most certainly is, and do pretty much whatever he wants.
 
 
+18 # Guest 2010-05-27 04:51
As long as Corporate America rules the land, the on-the-jobs deaths will continue. When Ronald Reagan did away with governmental controls back in the l980's, it left a gap wide open for abusing workers. He knew that American citizens were helpless against the a Supreme Court Justices full of corporate bought Executive, Legislature and the Judicial Branches of Government. American works are still paying for those decisions with blood, sweat and tears.

The sad point, there is NO justice for this type of behavior. To remedy what has been going on since the Reagan Administration, first, we must impeach, prosecute and jail everyone associated with these inhuman practices. That will include anyone that served under Ronald Reagan, GH Bush/offsprings and those appointed Supreme Court five right wing conservative judges.

As long as the USA have thsoe Supreme Courts five, there will be no justice in the US for working men and women.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-05-27 05:04
Who was the anonymous BP Official mentioned ? Has he every been identified ?
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-05-27 05:38
No doubt that BP is responsible for bad decision making and putting profitability before safety or the common good. But I am also responsible, and so are you. Whatever we have, is the indirect result of the choices we make. We elected the politicians (or didn't fight hard enough to prevent their election) who appointed now supervise the oversight commissions that have gotten so cozy with big oil. We tolerate a political agenda that puts profits and re-election before all else. We allow corporations' rights to preceed our own. It seems that it's just our nature to not speak up until it's too late. BP's shame is our shame. But that can change.
 
 
+13 # Guest 2010-05-27 06:52
Speak for yourself, Earl. Hundreds of us were in the streets time and again, protesting Bush II. We worked for the election of those opposed to him. We gave money to opposition groups. We supported calls for impeachment. Unfortunately, there weren't enough of us, and too many sheeple drank the Kool-Aid.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-05-27 08:13
Speak for yourself. Exclude me from your rant and it's the same one I have been shouting for years. I am a wrinkled old Cassandra, but I have never let down in my dissent have done all I could do to warn and try to stop these preventable disasters. Therefore, I have kept current my license to complain and apportion blame on those who did not.
 
 
+10 # Guest 2010-05-27 06:07
This is no conspiracy and it is not a joking matter. Corporations have been shafting people with the mentality of Continuum above for decades now. We can no longer play the partisan sap. Tt is how the power elite divide and conquer. They have left the working man virtually penniless, without real estate, and a slave to wage labor.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-05-27 08:17
Quoting
This is no conspiracy and it is not a joking matter. Corporations have been shafting people with the mentality of Continuum above for decades now. We can no longer play the partisan sap. Tt is how the power elite divide and conquer. They have left the working man virtually penniless, without real estate, and a slave to wage labor.


HOw can you be so sure it is not a conspiracy. What's with the fear of being labeled someone who can recognize a conspiracy when they see one. This phobia now protects real conspiracies. Can't you see that?
 
 
+9 # Guest 2010-05-27 06:30
The thought that we can turn industry around to solve this problem ignores the cost.

Roosevelt had the luxury of a government that could raise money. When the maximum rates on the highest incomes were above 90% on the peak income, rather than the mid teens for capital gain incomes now, the government could react. The very rich have very little W-2 income.

Those that don't believe in government but have been running the government for the past 30 years have crippled the federal government and all of the states that piggyback federal taxation. The governments are now financially as well as morally bankrupt.

They won!
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-05-27 08:21
I agree with everything except that they have won. The game's not quite over yet. They have been winning and it's up to the few alert and actively resisting folks to keep up the pressure to repent and reform. We still have a lot of work to do. Not trying is not the answer.
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-05-27 06:41
the "peter principle" stikes again. The B.P. exec was promoted to a job that was above his ability to comprehend. hey B.p. let the guys that know what they are doing to make the decisions. have you ever heard about safety in the workplace? this happens in every company with know-nothing execs.
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-05-27 08:29
The Peter Principle also works with government bureaucracies in the same way. This disaster required the marriage of both. There is no point in having a government if it only protects private profits and socializes all the risks.

Too big to fail= all risks are borne by taxpayers and not corporations

and the profits go to the executives and private investors.

This is a formula for feudalism coming back as our socio-economic system.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-05-27 07:20
Let's just say the US is beyond hope. The only way that's going to change is once there is a prospect of dissolution. For the US to dissolve at least one of the states needs to secede. Right now the closest candidate for that great historical impetus is Vermont, with Professor Thomas Naylor's Second Vermont Republic secession movement. Texas and California also have strong secession movements. Let's do it! Pete Edler, Stockholm
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-05-27 08:31
This would be a good move. California votes have only a small percentage of the voting power of a small population state. It is totally undemocratic and has resulted in real disenfranchisem ent. Until this is addressed, nothing will change.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-05-27 09:41
Do you really think that succession would give us a better form of government. I live in Texas and it is easy enough to see that the movement is driven by hard core conservatives with completely unrealistic views of society, the government and the world.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-05-27 08:54
I fear our outrage will be duly ignored by the ruling elite (yes, Virginia, there is a Ruling Elite) who control just about every nexus of power in the country. Essentially, they rule, using the thin veneer of democracy to control their never-ending lust for more money and power. The amazing fact about all this is that they are now out in the open, for all of us to see and wonder how this has happened. How many of us can honestly say we support any of the major aspects of our domestic or foreign policies? How many can deny we are now a very well-defined class society, quite similar to the ancient feudal system? How many of us can deny that what's going on in Washingtonl is simply a charade, orchestrated by the same group that has led us to this dead-end? Isn't it time we began discussing solutions which will do away with a system which is rotten through to it's very center?
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-05-27 10:05
First of all, no worker deserve to die either at sea, land, air, work placeson in the coal mines.That is why Unions are so important but most workers shun, intimidated, threatened with job loss by it's factories overseas, or the institutionaliz ed corporate-whores police bureaucrats beating them up for demonstration for decent wages. That can happened when corporate America control the government and it's Congress in addition to the Executive, Legislature and most all, the Judicial branch of government. All it's sins these three branches of government imposed on it's citizens during the Republicans years have now come to haunt the nation.

The sad facts are, the dead workers were most likely republicans, just like those dead mine workers and voted with Republicans to keep them in power.

Yes, indeed, voting for republicans and corporate America does have serious drawbacks!

We shall see in Novermber if they will win.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-05-27 10:34
You want names? Here's one: Jimmy Harrell, as shown in the quote below taken from a similar report on Truthout.

"One employee was so mad, the rig's chief mechanic Doug Brown testified, that he warned they'd be relying on the rig's blowout preventer if they proceeded the way BP wanted.
"He pretty much grumbled, 'Well, I guess that's what we have those pinchers for,' " Brown said of Jimmy Harrell, the top Transocean official on the rig. "Pinchers" was likely a reference to the shear rams in the blowout preventers, the final means of stopping an explosion."
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-05-27 10:45
I am all for criminal prosecution of the offending BP official(s). They were brazen enough to demand that the shortcuts be taken. Let them, and anyone else who dares to follow in their selfish, negligent decision making footsteps, be brazen enough to spend the rest of their lives pounding rock salt behind bars. Far too many of us were hurt, and are going to be hurt as a direct consequence of their choice not to proceed with the logical safety precautions.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-05-27 12:09
This was the same corporate middle management thinking that led to the seal failure and death of the Challenger space shuttle and all of its crew. How many of these sorts of decisions are made everyday but luckily do not result in disaster? Or the disaster is downplayed such as the blowout in the Sea of Timor? Peter Principle?
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-05-27 15:43
You must understand that the managers job is to produce oil regardless of the advice of the rig crew. BP is about "MONEY." These managers do not live in the area so they have no problem
endangering the lives of the people and the environment.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-09-20 00:29
found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.