RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "The case concerns Malcolm Harris, who was among hundreds arrested last October for disorderly conduct in an Occupy movement march along the Brooklyn Bridge."

More than 700 Occupy protesters were arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge. October 01, 2011. (photo: bogieharmond/Flickr)
More than 700 Occupy protesters were arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge. October 01, 2011. (photo: bogieharmond/Flickr)


Twitter Reluctantly Coughs Up Occupy Protester's Data

By David Kravets, Wired

20 September 12

 

Occupy Wall Street: Take the Bull by the Horns

 

witter on Friday reluctantly complied with a judge's order to divulge the tweets and account information connected to an Occupy protester.

The case concerns Malcolm Harris, who was among hundreds arrested last October for disorderly conduct in an Occupy movement march along the Brooklyn Bridge.

Prosecutors sought tweets made by Harris' account "to refute the defendant's anticipated defense, that the police either led or escorted the defendant into stepping onto the roadway of the Brooklyn Bridge."

The case was being closely watched as the authorities increasingly monitor and move to access material posted on social networks. The development comes two months after the micro-blogging site reported that, for the first six months of the year, the authorities sought information on Twitter user accounts 679 times, and Twitter produced some or all of the information 75 percent of the time.

Prosecutors sought Harris' Twitter information using a subpoena, which allows authorities to obtain data without a warrant.

The social media giant filed an appeal in late August asking the New York appeals court to reconsider Manhattan Criminal Court Judge Matthew A. Sciarrino's earlier rulings ordering it to give state authorities tweets and account information on two Twitter accounts used by Harris. Sciarrino denied Twitter's request to stay the order until the appeals court ruled on it.

The judge demanded Twitter release the data or hand over its confidential earnings statements from the last two quarters so he could determine how much of a fine to levy against the company. Twitter, which keeps such financial data secret, had until Friday to produce the data.

Twitter again Friday asked the court to stay his order until after Twitter's appeal is heard in November, but that plea was rejected. Terryl Brown, Twitter's attorney, told the court that "Twitter is being given a fundamentally unfair Hobson's choice that is contrary to the core of our justice system of being compelled to either waive its right to appeal so that novel legal issues may be adjudicated on the merits, or being held in criminal and/or civil contempt."(.pdf)

The judge's July ruling said that, "If you post a tweet, just like if you scream it out the window, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. There is no proprietary interest in your tweets, which you have now gifted to the world. This is not the same as a private e-mail, a private direct message, a private chat, or any of the other readily available ways to have a private conversation via the internet that now exist. Those private dialogues would require a warrant based on probable cause in order to access the relevant information."

The judge said he would read the since-deleted tweets privately before allowing any into the case. In a bid to corroborate that the tweets were posted by Harris, the judge required Twitter to turn over the account information connected to the account of @destructuremal, including any information Twitter had about the owner of the account, including his e-mail address. The authorities believe that account belongs to Harris and in a post online, Harris confirmed the accounts were his.

In its appeal, (.pdf) Twitter wrote that Harris' tweets are protected by the Fourth Amendment "because the government admits that it cannot publicly access them, thus establishing that defendant maintains a reasonable expectation of privacy in his communications." The Twitter accounts in question have been closed and are no longer publicly available.

But even if Harris' tweets were publicly available, Twitter points out that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that "public information which would allow law enforcement to draw mere inferences about a citizen's thoughts and associations are entitled to Constitutional protection, thus establishing that a citizen's substantive communications are certainly entitled to the same protection."

The case began in January, when the district attorney in Manhattan asked Twitter to hand over all tweets posted to the account of @destructuremal between September 15 and December 31, as well as any information Twitter had about the owner of the account, such as a user name, e-mail address or IP addresses used to access the account to post the tweets. In March, the government served Twitter with a second order for records related to a different Twitter account, @getsworse, also believed to belong to Harris.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+9 # Richard Miller 2012-09-21 11:37
Another reason I do not twitter or Facebook....get ting real tired of these internet companies taking away our privacy and allowing the government a free pass to use our comments to imprison us.
 
 
-1 # Old Man 2012-09-22 14:16
Quoting Richard Miller:
Another reason I do not twitter or Facebook....getting real tired of these internet companies taking away our privacy and allowing the government a free pass to use our comments to imprison us.

Well Richard, Why are you here then?????
 
 
+2 # Vardoz 2012-09-21 13:08
They will use anything they can to defeat decent.
 
 
+3 # Lawrence 2012-09-21 16:38
Wilkommen auf der Nuen Weltordnung Polizeistaat
 
 
+2 # pernsey 2012-09-21 18:06
Quoting Lawrence:
Wilkommen auf der Nuen Weltordnung Polizeistaat


A police state indeed Lawrence.
 
 
+2 # Anarchist 23 2012-09-21 21:39
Papier, Bitte!
 
 
+4 # RMDC 2012-09-22 06:42
This is just silly. Twitter was started with CIA investment money. All Twitter transactions are caputred by the NSA, CIA, Pentagon, homeland Security just like all other internet and phone traffic. This suit was not needed. It is just a pretense to make some people believe that prosecutors and the justice department follows some rules.

I suppose if they want to use what they find in someone's Twitter account as evidence in court, then they need to get the information legally. But they already have it by the covert means.

Nothing on the internet or a phone is private. There may be some really good incryptions that the NSA cannot break but I doubt it.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN