RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "Firearms sales are surging in the US in the wake of the Colorado massacre as buyers express fears that politicians may use the shootings to seek new restrictions on owning weapons."

(image: Time Magazine)
(image: Time Magazine)



Gun Sales Surge in US Following Colorado Shooting

By Associated Press

25 July 12

 

irearms sales are surging in the US in the wake of the Colorado massacre as buyers express fears that politicians may use the shootings to seek new restrictions on owning weapons.

In Colorado – the scene of Friday's shooting during the screening of a Batman film that killed 12 and injured dozens of others – gun sales jumped in the three days that followed. The state approved background checks for 2,887 people who wanted to purchase a firearm – 25% more than the average Friday to Sunday period in 2012 and 43% more than the same period the week before.

Dick Rutan, owner of Gunners Den in suburban Arvada, said requests for concealed-weapon training certification were "off the hook". His four-hour course in gun safety, required for certification for a concealed-weapons permit in Colorado, had drawn double the interest since Friday.

"What they're saying is they want to have a chance. They want to have the ability to protect themselves and their families if they are in a situation like what happened in the movie theatre," Rutan said.

Day-to-day gun sales frequently fluctuate, but the numbers also look strong outside Colorado.

In King county in Washington state, there were nearly twice as many requests for concealed pistol licences as a year ago. Florida recorded 2,386 background checks on Friday, up 14% from the week before. Sales in Oregon on Friday and Saturday were up 11% on the previous month. Four days of checks in California were up 10% month-on-month.

During the past decade, June and July have consistently been the slowest months for gun sales, according to FBI data.

Jay Wallace, who owns Adventure Outdoors in Smyrna, Georgia, found his sales on Saturday were up 300% from the same day a year ago – making it one of the best Saturdays his business has ever had. He said customers were often afraid when there's a gun-related tragedy that some lawmakers might try and push through an anti-gun agenda.

"We shouldn't let one sick individual make us forget and lose sight of freedoms in this country," Wallace said.

Authorities have said that the suspected Colorado shooter, James Holmes, methodically stockpiled weapons and explosives at work and home in recent months. They said he purchased thousands of rounds of ammunition and a shotgun, a semi-automatic rifle and two Glock pistols.

On Friday, clad in head-to-toe combat gear, he is said to have burst into a midnight showing of the latest Batman film, The Dark Knight Rises, tossed gas canisters into the crowd and opened fire. The shooting killed 12 people and wounded dozens of others.

Police in the Denver suburb of Aurora say Holmes also booby-trapped his apartment. Holmes remains in solitary confinement at a local jail.

The rise in gun sales reflects one of many anxieties created by the attack. Since the massacre, there have been reports of chaos at cinemas, apparently sparked by misunderstandings or careless words.

A confrontation with an intoxicated man in Arizona caused about 50 people to flee the cinema, authorities said. A southern California man was arrested after authorities say he made allusions to the Aurora massacre after the movie failed to start on time. In New Jersey, a showing of the film was cancelled after someone stood up during the movie, opened an emergency exit and then returned to their seat.

About 90 minutes into a Monday night showing in Santa Monica, California, shrieks from some girls sent about two dozen people sprinting for the exit. It turned out that a large man with a backpack was actually not a threat and was simply having a medical problem.

"This was nothing, and yet it startled us and rattled us so much," said moviegoer Paria Sadighi.

Nationally, the shootings have triggered a fierce debate over gun control and whether the government should have a role in reining in the ownership of firearms.

Gun sales often fluctuate according to news events, especially whenever people think the passage of more restrictive gun laws is imminent. Sales spiked following the election of President Barack Obama, when weapons enthusiasts expressed fear that the Democrats might curtail gun rights. FBI figures also show background checks for handgun sales jumped in Arizona following the shooting of congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in 2011.

"It's not uncommon for us to see spikes in requests for concealed pistol licences when there's a significant gun-related tragedy," said Sergeant Cindi West of the King county sheriff's office.

Some Democrats in Congress cited the shooting as evidence of the need for tougher gun control laws – particularly a ban on high-capacity ammunition magazines. Congress, however, has not passed strict legislation in more than a decade, and leaders in Washington DC show no sign of bringing up such measures any time soon.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+4 # The Voice of Reason 2012-07-25 13:00
"protect their family" ?? I think they want to buy up the machine guns before some gun control nut (their word) puts a stop to is.
 
 
+6 # Kayjay 2012-07-25 16:42
You'd think that following yet another, mass shooting of innocents with automatic weapons, would move the masses to embrace control. But this nation only embraces guns and more guns. Our new norm for getting around will be...car keys; check, wallet; check, GUN....check. Going out to the movies, opera, ballet, ball game or just out to eat, be sure to pack. If anything suspicious happens, there are lots of us to take em out! Sheesh.... it all makes me want to move to Canada, eh.
 
 
0 # ramblinjim 2012-07-26 07:28
Here in Arizona its legal to carry a handgun anywhere (unless a private business forbids it, or, of course, a court house) but very rare to see anyone carry. I routinely shop at the center where Gabby Gifford and others were shot but never carry my gun there or anywhere. Perhaps I should
 
 
0 # robniel 2012-08-03 06:58
My experience as a crime scene investigator is that many who carry feel weak, cowardly and impotent without a firearm. Vigilantes with guns have the potential to create havock in a shootout situation, where it's hard to tell who the actual "bad guy" is in a rapidly-develop ing situation. Police have the same perception problem and have on occasion shot the wrong person when guns pop up unexpectantly. Carry at your own risk.
 
 
-1 # John Locke 2012-07-26 17:08
Kayjay Let me know when you plan the move we will through a going away party
 
 
-1 # Phlippinout 2012-07-25 22:16
These gun folks are so pitifully predictable. I laugh at what tools they are. Buy up the guns suckers, cant take em with you when your dead.
 
 
-1 # John Locke 2012-07-26 17:10
fightback: Isn't it amazing how both sides believe they are right and smug about it, and really only one side is right, those in favor of owning guns!
 
 
+1 # Rick Levy 2012-07-25 22:21
Private ownership of high power weapons is turning American into a slaughterhouse.
 
 
+3 # paulrevere 2012-07-26 07:20
"turning American into a slaughterhouse."

lol...such skirt high hyperbole!

You sound like a KKK'er claiming the devil is gonna get all white girl daughters fer pete's sake.

The gun issue can't hold a candle to what the government is doing to ALL rights and freedoms in this country...and you want MORE?
 
 
0 # freeportguy 2012-07-25 22:29
That conservative wet dream of a lone ranger saving the day in a crowded room by taking a shooter...
 
 
0 # grendel 2012-07-26 04:51
In the aftermath of each and all the Colorado Theater Shootings, which of course are a part of the American version of Civilture, the hands get wrung, the heads get shaken and the refrain always works its way out in some version of "how does someone get so detached?" Hmm,Detachment? A "behavior" which might be defined as individuals believing that the first thing they should do is go out and buy all the guns. Good Luck!
 
 
+2 # ramblinjim 2012-07-26 07:31
Guns are just a form of collectible, like rare books, fishing lures, knives, dolls, etc. I own five guns but haven't fired any of them in years. I'm sure I won't shoot Abraham Lincoln in a Baltimore theatre.
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-26 11:01
However, someone did
 
 
+1 # ABen 2012-07-26 07:21
The idea of an armed bystander pulling his/her weapon and taking down a crazed gunman is a favorite "hobby horse" of modern NRA types (the org wasn't always this nutty) and paranoid, weapon obsessed citizens. While such an event is certainly within the realm of possibility, how probably and/or practical is it? When Jared Lee Loughner pulled his Glock and opened up on the crowd of citizens assembled for Gabrielle Giffords' 'meet and greet,' there was a citizen in the immediate area who was in fact armed. He readied his weapon and prepared to take down the shooter. What he nearly did was shoot the person who had already taken away Loughner's weapon. When I hear gun nuts spout some version of the "take down the crazed gunman" myth, I think of the old Dick Tracy cartoons in which Tracy and some bad guy blaze away at each other resulting in three or four bystanders with holes in them. Had some armed citizen in that darkened theater in Colorado pulled a weapon and opened up on the shooter, who knows how many more innocent victims we would have.
 
 
+1 # John Locke 2012-07-26 17:14
ABen: Or how many lives may have been saved! There are two sides to a coin! Not just one version!!!
 
 
+1 # ABen 2012-07-26 19:12
John; I understand that you are a "gun person." That's fine, I also own a gun--a SW revolver that I or my wife carry when we hike in wilderness areas. We are both very good shots. However, I/we never carry it anywhere else; the possibility of harming or killing an innocent bystander while in the process of trying to stop a crazed shooter is not worth the risk. I have personally witnessed the carnage that is possible when guns are used in a social setting. You may make a different choice, and I hope you are ready to deal with the consequences of that choice.
 
 
0 # John Locke 2012-07-27 07:31
ABen: I also do not carry in public. However some people do and they have concealed weapons permits and have gone through a required training course!

But people right now are fearful that these continuing nut cases will cause more suffering and are arming themselves. I can understand the emotions, but until society can be assured that the criminals and insane people do not have access to the black market for weapon sales, this is the only defense we have...and the real responsible party is our own government...

As I have said before the CIA armed the Bloods and Crypts...with assault weapons...when we have a government that is corrupt our only salvation is to be just as armed!
 
 
+2 # The Voice of Reason 2012-07-26 07:25
Still, more people are killed by a drunk drivers (~38,000 in 2010) than are murdered by a lunatic mass shooting.

Total acceptance of alcohol, outrage of guns. I suppose there is nothing hypocritical about this.
 
 
+1 # ramblinjim 2012-07-26 08:55
In many states a person can (legally) buy a gun at age 18 (or less, depending on the state, but can't buy a drink. In my day, a person could be drafted and sent off to war but not be able to buy a drink. It's a stupid, rotten country, let's face it, and conditions in America drive people to kill others. Expect more, guns or not.
 
 
0 # The Voice of Reason 2012-07-26 09:45
The age law doesn't regulate when you can drink, it regulates when you can become an alcoholic. And it still is more of a hope than a reality, given the high number of teenage drinkers and alcoholics. At least they support the alcohol tax base. So what if a few hundred thousand people are murdered by drunk drivers. Gotta support that tax base.
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-26 11:03
Never knew an age limit from stopping any one from drinking...
 
 
0 # Glen 2012-07-26 13:21
Don't forget ramblinjim that kids could not vote, either. It's complicated, isn't it.
 
 
+1 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-26 11:02
I am even more pissed that so many on alcohol are out there in their cars with guns.
 
 
-3 # HowardMH 2012-07-26 08:16
Obama the Wimp would not renew the Assault Weapons law. Who – Who – Who - needs a magazine that holds 20, 30, 50 or 100 shells? It is the Idiots, Terrorists, Stupid People, Republicans, and the NRA who is making Millions from the stupid people. The NRA has bought all the Republicans and most of the Cowardly Democrats. It is not about having guns, and the 2nd amendment, it is all about the large magazines.

The NRA has done a fantastic job of scaring the Stupid People that their 2nd Amendment Rights are being taken away just because they can’t have magazines with 20, 30, 50 or 100 shells.

It is all about the magazines stupid not the guns.
 
 
0 # ramblinjim 2012-07-26 08:58
In the wake of the mass killings, I was watching "American Gun" on the history channell where they were attempting to build a fully auctomatic weapon with TWO large magazines. It didn't shock me. It was just kind of ironic. I'm not opposed to guns or 50 round clips. If you own a vehicle you can kill and injur countless people before you're stopped
 
 
0 # Glen 2012-07-26 08:57
Americans are raised with myths of freedom and rights. They are also raised with the fear of losing control.

Too many gun owners have wrapped their ego around the guns rather than being responsible. The emotional reaction to events as in Aurora and to a false perception that someone like Obama MIGHT take guns away, is the perfect example of all of the above. Those gun promoters - as opposed to gun owners - give guns and ownership a bad name.

Anti-gun people are also emotional, so rather than encourage sensible behavior, the first idea to pop up is, yes, control. The very control emotional gun promoters are afraid of.

On the other hand, as has been written numerous times of late: the U.S. is a sick and dying society, so the violence and killing that has always existed is increasing.
 
 
+2 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-26 11:05
They also prey on people...left NRA 4 decades ago never regretted. They never help anyone but themselves...
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-26 11:10
More a__holes with guns. Most will probably not know how to use, store etc.
Others will probably have them stolen, shoot themselves or have their kids get a hold of them.
I wonder how many were bought illegally using fake id's.

People kill People not guns or Autos.
Guns do not load themselves and fire. Autos need someone, in normal circumstances, to drive them.

USA is in need of People to get off their butts. Their is nothing wrong with the USA than a good cleaning up and again You need People to do so. People are the Problem with Society and what goes wrong in Society everyday.

Stop Blame Game...Learn from Mistakes and start taking Control Back. You are In Charge.
 
 
0 # ramblinjim 2012-07-26 13:10
The first step to taking back control is to arm yourself. An unarmed population can be loaded into cattle cars by some crazed kraut and shipped to death camps. don't think that couldn't happen in the U.S.
 
 
-2 # John Locke 2012-07-26 17:19
ramblinjim: We are on the verge of it happening, they don't seem to understand the ramifications of Obama's NDAA...they are too busy appologizing for this looney toon pretend president
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN