Excerpt: "A senior legal advisor to the Ecuadorean government said they would protect Mr. Assange from that prospect for as long as it takes and would be writing to the US authorities in the coming days to ask whether they have any intention of seeking Mr. Assange's forward extradition."
Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder faces extradition to Sweden. (photo: Independent UK)
Ecuadorean Officials Invite Swedish Authorities to London to Interview Assange
27 July 12
he Wikileaks founder Julian Assange could yet avoid extradition for questioning over sexual assault allegations after Ecuadorean government officials invited the Swedish authorities to London, offering to host an interview there instead.
Senior Ecuadorean government sources said today they have sent a formal request to Sweden and would be happy to facilitate questioning between Mr Assange and the Swedish prosecutor in their west London embassy, where the Wikileaks founder has been staying for the more than a month after claiming asylum.
The embassy, a grand building which sits behind Harrod’s in London’s chic Knightsbridge, would be the perfect setting, senior officials said today.
His supporters have expressed fears that the American authorities are seeking to prosecute Mr Assange for his involvement with Wikileaks and would use his extradition as an opportunity to pounce. But Ecuadorean officials said they were also seeking assurances that, in the event of his extradition to Sweden, Mr Assange would not later be sent on to the USA.
A senior legal advisor to the Ecuadorean government said they would protect Mr Assange from that prospect for as long as it takes and would be writing to the US authorities in the coming days to ask whether they have any intention of seeking Mr Assange’s forward extradition.
He added that they have already asked the British government, which must agree to the extradition, for assurances it would not do so and for information on what contact about a potential extradition – if any - they have had with their American counterparts.
“If Ecuador could be assured that the evil it wishes to prevent: the extradition to the USA of Julian Assange, could be [avoided], then that would be a just solution,” the advisor said today.
He acknowledged that the Ecuadorean government has little realistic chance of getting an answer from America on the question of whether or not it plans to seek Mr Assange’s extradition. But he added: “The litmus test will be the contact from the UK. If they have no problem giving assurances [that they will not allow it], then we can assume that there has been no request [from America].”
He said the Ecuadorean authorities in London have held around 20 meetings with their UK counterparts and around 10 with the Swedish government in the last month. No contact has been made with the US authorities.
The advisor said today that Quito was seeking the answers from the British, Swedish and American governments before it made any decision on Mr Assange’s asylum claim. “We will ask of the Americans: is there an investigation which has identified [Julian Assange] as a target and will there be an extradition request in the future,” he said.
Of the British government, he said they asked whether or not it would agree to Mr Assange’s forward extradition and what discussions British officials have had with their US counterparts on the issue, in a bid to ascertain America’s intentions.
He added: “we have asked the Swedish authorities why they want him in Stockholm and not in the UK; and whether they have had any contact with the USA about possible extradition.”
The offer to Sweden was made yesterday and the Foreign Office was informed immediately, said a senior Ecuadorean government political advisor. He said they have not yet received any formal responses yet but Quito will base its decision, which will not come before the Olympic Games end in any case, on those they eventually do receive.
He added that Ecuador has not yet discussed the issue of safe passage with their British counterparts and did not intend to try to get Mr Assange out of the UK. Officials said they hoped to find a solution “which suits all parties, including Mr Assange” before they considered that possibility.
Mr Assange walked into the Ecuadorean Embassy in London on 19 June and claimed asylum. In doing so, he breached bail conditions requiring him to stay at a specified address each evening. He faces being arrested if he leaves the embassy.
His Swedish lawyer told the Independent that the questions posed by the Ecuadorean authorities must be answered by the Swedish prosecutor. Per Samuelson said: “I have on behalf of my client asked the prosecutor to go to London to do the interview but have so far not received an answer. I hope she does come this time.”
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
 18 May 2013
|
 16 May 2013
|
 16 May 2013
|
 17 May 2013
|
 19 May 2013
|
 16 May 2013
|
 18 May 2013
|
|
17 May 2013
|
 18 May 2013
|
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
It is not necessary for such a deal between the US and Sweden to be articulated since each knows what the other wants. It thus becomes a covert partnership: if the US indicates later that it wants Assange, and Sweden has him, they will likely surrender him. In the meantime, Sweden is likely to give the US every opportunity to ask-- for as long a period as possible. It is entirely possible that the Swedish judicial process will be prolonged for this reason.
Quite a political/legal trap for someone who has yet to be charge of any crime and is only wanted for questioning.
Huffington Post's Dr. Vivian Norris has an excellent interview piece with Assange's mother-- which discusses both Wikileaks and the sexual allegations in some detail. Worth a read if you want to understand the situation better.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vivian-norris-de-montaigu/democracy-trust-and-wikileaks_b_1705109.html
I think I'd more aptly say "Especially Israel" obeys.
And y'know, most of progressive Europe, with the possible exception of Westminster, progressive majority Latin America, parts of Africa, quite a bit of India and S.E. Asia, are increasingly separating themselves from the former domineering-dom ination of the Fragmented States, to their everlasting (I hope) credit. And China has it's own power not to be disregarded.
I hate to disillusion you but the current Empire is in steep decline both at home and in it's influence, the huge, wasteful, destructive and polluting military-indust rial death machine notwithstanding !
that's why they are all so pissed of Assange and why he should be VERY careful.
Everyone seems to want a reasonable and open solution to this impasse except for the US, UK, and Sweden. I'd say Equador should give Sweden a deadline -- come question Assange in our embassy by Sept. 1st or forgo the chance.
RSS feed for comments to this post