RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Schwartz reports: "Arizona police can begin enforcing a controversial 'show-your-papers' provision of a state law aimed at cracking on illegal immigration."

In this July 22, 2010 file photo, a protester is arrested by Phoenix Police Department officers after refusing to move while blocking an intersection during a protest against Arizona immigration law SB1070. (photo: AP)
In this July 22, 2010 file photo, a protester is arrested by Phoenix Police Department officers after refusing to move while blocking an intersection during a protest against Arizona immigration law SB1070. (photo: AP)


Judge Rules Arizona Can Enforce Strict Provision to Immigration Law

By David Schwartz, Reuters

19 September 12

 

rizona police can begin enforcing a controversial "show-your-papers" provision of a state law aimed at cracking on illegal immigration, which was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, after a federal judge lifted an injunction against the law on Tuesday.

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton, in a written order, lifted an injunction blocking the measure, which requires police to check the immigration status of people they stop and suspect are in the country illegally.

The measure is part of a broad clamp-down on illegal immigration in the state signed into law in 2010 by Arizona's Republican Governor Jan Brewer, an outspoken critic of President Barack Obama's administration over federal policies on the issue.

In approving the law, Brewer had complained that the U.S. government failed to secure Arizona's border with Mexico.

"Today is the day we have awaited for more than two years," Brewer said in response to Bolton's ruling, adding that it was not enough to merely enforce the law.

"It must be enforced efficiently, effectively and in harmony with the Constitution and civil rights. I have full faith and confidence that Arizona's State and local law enforcement officers are prepared for this task," she said in a statement.

The measure requiring police immigration checks was one of several blocked by Bolton before the law took effect in July of 2010 and had been subject to repeated appeals by civil rights groups seeking to prevent it from going into force.

Obama's administration challenged the Arizona immigration law in court two years ago, saying the Constitution gives the federal government sole authority over immigration policy.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the "show-your-papers" measure in June but struck down three other provisions of the law.

Opponents of the law complained that it amounted to a mandate for racial profiling of Hispanics, who make up nearly a third of Arizona's 6.5 million people and urged the Obama administration on Tuesday to soften its impact.

"President Obama has the moral responsibility and legal authority to protect the people of Arizona," the National Day Laborer Organizing Network said in a statement.

"We expect he will do everything within his power to prevent the discrimination, punishment, and suffering that will escalate under ... (the law's) implementation," it added.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+6 # Activista 2012-09-19 14:19
Totalitarian US stole Arizona from Mexico - now we are running wall (like commies in Berlin separating families) around the USA - shooting people on the border. It is like in the Middle East.
 
 
+2 # MidwestTom 2012-09-20 04:49
If we destroy nations and borders, we pave the way to the New World Order; which is more clearly defined as the dictatorship by the super wealthy. Mix the 99% of the world in one big pot, and the 1% will rule; in fact the 99% will beg for the 1% rule to stop the chaos.
 
 
+6 # dkonstruction 2012-09-20 05:54
Quoting MidwestTom:
If we destroy nations and borders, we pave the way to the New World Order; which is more clearly defined as the dictatorship by the super wealthy. Mix the 99% of the world in one big pot, and the 1% will rule; in fact the 99% will beg for the 1% rule to stop the chaos.


Capital has already "destroyed nations and borders." If the 1% push for the rights of capital to go where it wants when it wants then "we the people" should be demanding the same thing....this would allow, for example, workers to organize across borders (i.e., either "one big union" as the IWW called for nearly 100 years ago or international unions organiced by trades) where demands could include that US corporations moving overseas has to pay the equivalent of US union wages.

To stick our heads in the sand and pretend that in a globalized world (and global economy) that we should once again become "isolationists" instead of "bottom up internationalis ts is simply to deny the reality of the world in which we are now living
 
 
+1 # Activista 2012-09-20 12:05
Of course 1% rich from Mexico can travel with no problems. Globalization has some positive effects - like very unlikely US - China war - Global Warming effects - US promiscuous use of energy must be stopped. Nation state (nationalism) - imagine all the people - very hard to start classical wars in this context. This is why New World Order is starting civil wars for control.
Agree with dkonstruction ...
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN