RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Shen writes: "The New York Police Department has put out a 'police advisory' flyer warning cops and residents to look out for two 'professional agitators,' a Harlem couple who film officers stopping and frisking young New Yorkers of color."

7153-christina-gonzalez-matthew-swaye-070512.jpg
Harlem couple and Occupy Wall Street protesters Christina Gonzalez and Matthew Swaye say they've been singled out by NYPD because they video cops conducting stop-and-frisks and posting them on YouTube. (photo: Susan Watts/NY Daily News)



NYPD Posts 'Wanted' Flyer Targeting Couple That Legally Videotapes Stop-and-Frisks

By Aviva Shen, ThinkProgress

05 July 12

 

Occupy Wall Street: Take the Bull by the Horns

 

he New York Police Department has put out a “police advisory” flyer warning cops and residents to look out for two “professional agitators,” a Harlem couple who film officers stopping and frisking young New Yorkers of color.

DNAinfo reports that Matthew Swaye, 35, and his partner Christina Gonzalez, 25, came across the poster, complete with mugshots and the official seal of the NYPD’s intelligence division, taped to a podium in the 30th precinct’s public hearing room while attending a precinct council meeting. The flyer listed the home address of the couple and warned:

Be aware that the subjects are known professional agitators that live at [home address]. Above subjects mo is that they video tape officers performing routine stops and post on youtube. Subjects purpose is to portray officers in a negative way and too deter officers from conducting there responsibilities. Above subjects also deter officers from being safe and tactical by causing unnecessary distractions. Do not feed into subjects propaganda.

Swaye and Gonzalez have been arrested several times in the past year for civil disobedience. Swaye was detained at a stop-and-frisk protest in Harlem, along with a a group of advocates including Cornel West. Gonzalez was arrested at a Father’s Day stop-and-frisk march and, on a separate occasion, spent a few days at Rikers on a contempt charge after refusing to apologize for calling conservative Brooklyn Judge John H. Wilson a “white racist pig.”

The couple post videos on a YouTube channel showing NYPD officers conducting stop-and-frisks and assaulting demonstrators. Swaye explained, “We see ourselves as peace activists. The mug shots were for civil disobedience. They have us here like we robbed a bank.”

Another person attending the meeting told DNAinfo, “I thought: ‘Why isn’t anyone arresting them? When you see something like that, you think there’s a reward out for the person on the flyer.”

According to DNAinfo, the New York Civil Liberties Union recorded 7,550 total stops in the 30th precinct last year, 3,987 which involved a frisk, ranking it 38th in total number of frisks city-wide. On June 20, the NYPD invited reporters to a press conference and demo of an updated stop-and-frisk program after coming under fire for the racially-skewed practice.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+57 # DavidMG 2012-07-05 12:39
"Known professional agitators" The US ise slowly adopting the rhetoric of authoritarian states. Could Ghandi get a visa today?
 
 
+21 # portiz 2012-07-05 20:45
The horrible grammar that the NYPD includes on the flyer provides a bit of comic relief.

Well, so much for them being "New York's finest". :-}
 
 
+41 # KrazyFromPolitics 2012-07-05 13:38
Many NYPD were born 100 years too late. They would have been very effective "Goose Steppers". No compliment intended. "1984" keeps throwing down deeper roots, and not enough people seem to be outraged.
 
 
+43 # KrazyFromPolitics 2012-07-05 13:46
Turn around the cliche that police use on the rest of us, "If you are not doing anything wrong, why would you be worried that I'm videoing you?" That would have the trajectory of a lead balloon for those that have latent "Rambo" tendencies.
 
 
+12 # Ralph Averill 2012-07-06 02:10
Agreed. And the flyer in the squad room could have read; "Make sure all your frisks are legal and legitimate."
 
 
+36 # ENetArch 2012-07-05 14:42
In Florida a teenage boy publicly outed an undercover cop attempting buying drugs from a seller. The boy was arrested and charged with disrupting a police procedure. The boy won the case based on his first amendment right to freedom of speech.
 
 
0 # mdhome 2012-07-07 12:29
GOOD!
 
 
0 # JJS 2012-07-08 03:40
Good, but...
Now the boy has to do the bureaucratic, paperwork run around to get his arrest records expunged, if he wants to remove the incident from his very public, police record. Then he has to make sure every agency and office he had contact with actually removes the expunged records. Even then his arrest is forever documented in the FBI files and, I'm sure, Homeland Security, etc..., etc...,

(Sarcasm alert) After all, this kid is an amateur agitator training to become a Professional!
 
 
+38 # pernsey 2012-07-05 18:31
In my view the police are the professional agitators, this couple just films them. Plus if the police arent doing anything wrong then why should they care if they are being taped?
 
 
+3 # Gevurah 2012-07-06 23:20
Hmmm...wonder who would be responsible if harm came to that couple because the police have made their address public. Wouldn't the police have some contributory responsibility?
 
 
+12 # Lisa Moskow 2012-07-05 19:40
I agree, Pernsey.

It irks me that the police are paid by citizens to cause more trouble than the
so-called criminals.
 
 
-22 # MidwestTom 2012-07-05 20:12
If crime is down the system must be working/
 
 
+7 # MJnevetS 2012-07-06 07:40
Quoting MidwestTom:
If crime is down the system must be working/
Grow up! violent crime has been purposely under-reported in NYC and apparently across the country. See, e.g. Http://www.examiner.com/article/the-underreporting-of-crime-is-epidemic

Crime is 'up' or 'down' based upon many factors and also by the intentional manipulation of statistics by local police departments.

Crime is actually at an all time high in NYC, however, most of the criminals have been given a free pass (just go down to Wall Street and you can find many criminals congregating in their office buildings, with the full protection of New York's finest against that 'scourge of democracy', Occupy protesters. Better you stay in the MidWest, Tom and keep your head buried in those prairie dog holes.
 
 
+5 # nirmalandhas 2012-07-05 20:32
Nice, nice...now we are all in one world...so when do we start talking together about what has to be done...when do we begin to build the new world movement instead of the new America Movement...
 
 
-11 # Montague 2012-07-05 21:28
I hate to say this, but the cops' argument will likely be "If YOU aren't doing anything wrong, why would you object to US putting your photograph on a poster?" It works both ways, even if we don't like it. Think about it before you deluge me with negative votes. The cops are basically saying their officers should be aware they're being recorded and to mind their Ps and Qs. Might even improve behavior.
 
 
0 # aitengri 2012-07-05 21:32
Well, with all due respect to the basic purpose of exposing the stupid poster, there's also the "peaceful" insult, calling the judge a white racist pig in his own courtroom. You just can't do that no matter what the irritating factors were. You just undermine everything you might be working for.
 
 
+1 # Glen 2012-07-06 07:02
You make a good point, aitengri. Until formal court systems break down entirely, it would behoove anyone attempting serious protest to work within that system, and with respect. Their point was well made without assisting in the breakdown of courtroom respect. Anyone familiar with protests and demonstrations should give these folks some serious advice.
 
 
+3 # Michael_K 2012-07-06 18:48
I often hear this type of argument... "work within the system", "be respectful of authority", "play their game, with their ball, in their court, by their rules"...

I have to laugh. Don't be surprised if you don't get anywhere! By the way, did you know they can get you on perjury at any time they want to? All they have to do is get you to call the judge "your honour" while you're under oath.
 
 
+1 # Glen 2012-07-07 04:18
Of course, Michael, but since they do have so much power, why tantalize them with more of a possibility of shutting you down or putting you in jail, where you can do little. These folks are pretty much on their own in this effort, generally, so they need to be out there continuing their monitoring.

Very often, stealth trumps frontal attack.
 
 
+5 # zippybob 2012-07-06 03:32
Very upsetting that NYPD and Kelly could stoop this low


I am Zippy
 
 
0 # Michael_K 2012-07-06 18:49
Bloomie is VERY very very short... So, believe me, Kelly can stoop VERY low to kiss his ass every day.
 
 
+12 # RLF 2012-07-06 05:00
Brave folks...my respect goes out to you!
 
 
+17 # Capn Canard 2012-07-06 05:12
I first heard of Gonzalez and Swaye on Youtube and watched a video where Gonzalez kept asking for a legitimate reason for their being in front of their apartment and, of course, getting no response from these police who were harassing them instead of doing the job of policing, i.e. to protect and serve. It is clear to me we live in a police state and I don't need any more evidence.
 
 
+9 # cordleycoit 2012-07-06 06:22
First I would recommend the the NPPD study proper english usages the apes are having trouble communicating. Next: Have the NYPD read aloud the First Amendment, every day, before hitting the bricks. Next where is the ACLU, Stop and Frisk is profiling in action. And targeting photographers is dumb you know how stupid a good camera guy can make a cop look?
 
 
-13 # Montague 2012-07-06 06:24
Pernsey, as I say, it works both ways even if we don't like it: this couple say they've the right to make images of cops and put them on the web; the cops are, I think, saying equally THEY'VE the right to post pics of THEM, with the same defence as the couple fired in reverse: anyone (cop or citizen) not doing anything wrong shouldn't object to being filmed/displaye d. Much as it irks, it's a quite clever response from the fuzz.
 
 
+10 # pernsey 2012-07-06 06:48
Quoting Montague:
Pernsey, as I say, it works both ways even if we don't like it: this couple say they've the right to make images of cops and put them on the web; the cops are, I think, saying equally THEY'VE the right to post pics of THEM, with the same defence as the couple fired in reverse: anyone (cop or citizen) not doing anything wrong shouldn't object to being filmed/displayed. Much as it irks, it's a quite clever response from the fuzz.


If someone came to where you work, and taped you, and you werent doing anything wrong...would you retaliate? Thats what I dont get. If they are following the law as police, then why should they care they are being taped. These citizens are keeping them accountable for their actions. In my view the police are trying to hide what they are doing by intimidating this couple and trying to make them out to be the bad guys. If the police are doing their job properly there shouldnt be any problem with them being taped.

This is just my opinion, and honestly if someone came where I worked and was taping me, I would love it! Thats just me though because I have nothing to hide!
 
 
+3 # Michael_K 2012-07-06 18:50
Yes, it's obvious they can't trust themselves not to get caught perpetrating heinous crimes against the citizens.
 
 
0 # mdhome 2012-07-07 12:36
That is what I don't get if they are doing their job in a fair and honest manner they should have nothing to fear. What are they afraid of? Have we become East Germany now with the Stazi patrolling the streets?
 
 
+4 # Feral Dogz 2012-07-06 07:25
Quoting Montague:
Pernsey, as I say, it works both ways even if we don't like it: this couple say they've the right to make images of cops and put them on the web; the cops are, I think, saying equally THEY'VE the right to post pics of THEM, with the same defence as the couple fired in reverse: anyone (cop or citizen) not doing anything wrong shouldn't object to being filmed/displayed. Much as it irks, it's a quite clever response from the fuzz.


Calling the harassment and intimidation of this couple by armed and violent "peace officers" a "clever response" is condoning repression of peaceful first amendment activity. Conservatives love the constitution as long as it doesn't get in their way.

I have been photographed and interviewed while working on numerous occasions. I regard this as good public relations, even though I have been mis-quoted by journalists who were more interested in expressing their opinions than in documenting events.
 
 
+6 # MJnevetS 2012-07-06 07:48
Being identified in a statement that states "Be aware that the subjects are known professional agitators that live at [home address]" is not the same as videotaping something happening in public view. It would be equally improper to publish a police officer's home address who was accused of misconduct. It will subject them to extra-judicial (i.e. illegal) harassment. Because of the address (if you'd read the article) police now sit in front of their home in a harassing fashion. As has been ruled upon, IT IS NOT ILLEGAL TO VIDEOTAPE POLICE ACTING IN PUBLIC IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTIES. Just as no search warrant is necessary for the police if they observe any actions done in public.
 
 
-15 # Montague 2012-07-06 07:54
Sorry, but I can't buy the argument that when these folks post images of the cops they're "keeping them accountable", yet when the fuzz respond in kind it's "harassment and intimidation". Nor the bizarre notion that anyone filmed who isn't doing anything wrong should have no objection - UNLESS it's this couple being lensed, when suddenly it's retaliation. When cops film people at demos who are doing nothing wrong most of us on this site rightly complain! Some even, I'm sure, film the cops filming them. As I say, we may not dig it, but the constitution applies equally to cops and citizens.The fact is, if we're honest, we sympathise with this couple so cut them plenty slack, but we don't like the cops actions so judge it differently. Can't have it all our own way.
 
 
+3 # Michael_K 2012-07-06 18:52
I don't think you're getting the important bit... they're just average citizens, cops are public servants who have onerous responsibilitie s... which they violate constantly, therefore requiring constant vigilance.
 
 
-11 # Montague 2012-07-06 08:06
How come this couple exercising first amendment rights by posting images of cops is fine, "keeping them accountable", yet cops doing the same is "intimidation"? When cops film innocent demonstrators doing nothing wrong they DO get angry, we don't say, as you suggest, "I'm not doing anything wrong so it's fine". We howl madly! Like it or not, if what the couple do is legal, then the fuzz doing the same is legal too. We have to grant them the same rights we have ourselves, like it or no, or we're as bad as...oh, anyone you don't like.
 
 
-8 # Montague 2012-07-06 08:27
MjNevetS: Sorry, I read the RSN article and it doesn't say about cops sitting in front of the couple's home. If it does I apologise. I'm only responding to the RSN piece, haven't read elsewhere. Also, again from the RSN piece, these weren't flyers papering the streets urging thugs to bother them - they saw A SINGLE poster aimed at cops inside a precinct meeting house, which is different in extent and intention, surely.
 
 
0 # MJnevetS 2012-07-09 10:21
I apologize, Montague, that information regarding the police sitting outside their home was from another news source, the quote is below:

"A new video taken by activists who were branded "professional agitators" for filming police stops — and shown on an NYPD "Wanted" poster at their local precinct — appears to show officers monitoring the pair's Harlem apartment building." Read more: http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20120704/west-harlem/professional-agitators-on-nypd-wanted-flier-eyed-by-cops-activists-say#ixzz209NZvUIx

When the police are being filmed, no one (to my knowledge) has posted their personal addresses (which would be an invitation for misconduct and harassment, as it is in this case))
 
 
+9 # JSRaleigh 2012-07-06 09:09
KNOWN PROFESSIONAL AGITATOR

I think I'll get that printed on a T-shirt.
 
 
+4 # Montague 2012-07-06 09:17
JSRaleigh: Brilliant!!!! Even better, UNKNOWN professional agitator!
 
 
+8 # MendoChuck 2012-07-06 09:25
We have the people of New York City to thank for this.
After all they actually voted Bloomberg back in as Mayor.
You get the government that you vote for . . . .
If you do not vote than you get the government that others vote for.

Welcome to the real world.
 
 
-2 # Michael_K 2012-07-06 18:53
Agreed.. and the same applies for Obama. We can't vote for THAT again. Vote for Jill Stein.
 
 
0 # Glen 2012-07-07 04:24
It appears to me that New York City is becoming the model for the rest of the country's cities. One little law at a time is being installed against citizens. California sets an example for the country, and now New York does, also.

Folks better pay attention.
 
 
+2 # billeeboy 2012-07-07 10:39
I greatly admire what Gonzalez and Swaye are doing in posting videos of police stop and frisk antics. Although I have much respect for people who practice civil disobedience in order to focus attention on important problems, I do think calling a judge a "white racist pig" (even if were true!) is self-defeating. Surely Mr. Swaye's time at Rykers could have been spent more effectively elsewhere! It is always important to choose your battles carefully to maximize impact. Thank goodness for "professional agitators" like these two young people!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN