FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Kaminsky reports: "Teachers at a Seattle high school...are refusing to give students a decades-old reading and math test after the city's school district decided to factor the exam into the instructors' evaluations."

19 teachers at a Seattle high school are refusing to give students a decades-old reading and math test. (photo: unknown)
19 teachers at a Seattle high school are refusing to give students a decades-old reading and math test. (photo: unknown)


Seattle Teachers Boycott Standardized Test

By Jonathan Kaminsky, Yahoo! News

14 January 13

 

eachers at a Seattle high school, in a rare boycott by educators against a standardized test, are refusing to give students a decades-old reading and math test after the city's school district decided to factor the exam into the instructors' evaluations.

The 19 teachers at Garfield High School have complained they are unable to adequately prepare students for the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) test, which was created over 25 years ago but was introduced to Seattle Public Schools in 2009.

The revolt by the Garfield teachers, who comprise all the instructors at the school required to give the MAP test, comes at a time of fierce political battles over teacher evaluations that has played out in cities from Chicago to Los Angeles.

The MAP test that has become a point of contention at Garfield is given at schools around the country but is not required by Washington state.

Unlike the tests required by the state, which are the High School Proficiency Exam and the End-of-Course exams, it has no bearing on students' grades or their ability to graduate.

Kris McBride, the school's testing administrator and a supporter of the 19 teachers, said the instructors do not object to all standardized testing.

But unlike the state-required math, science and reading tests, teachers are given no sample questions to help prepare students and they are not told what will be included on the test, which students complain often does not relate to their curriculum, McBride said.

The students are "sitting there feeling really stupid, saying, 'I don't know how to do this,'" McBride said.

Students are also aware the test has no bearing on their grades or ability to graduate, and some of them refuse to take it seriously, which can bring down their scores, McBride said.

At the same time, beginning this year it will be used in teacher evaluations, with possible consequences for instructors in classrooms that perform badly, she said.

McBride also said students taking the MAP exam tie up the school's computer lab and it cuts down on time for instruction.

Teacher evaluations have been a contentious issue in Washington state, as they have been in other parts of the country, and last year state lawmakers passed a law that for the first time makes firing teachers and principals a potential outcome of a poor evaluation.

"To use this (MAP) as a tool to evaluate our teaching makes no sense," said Jesse Hagopian, a history teacher at Garfield High. "They're setting us up for failure. And Garfield High School is not a failure. We're the home of (former students) Jimi Hendrix, Bruce Lee and Quincy Jones."

Representatives for Seattle Public Schools could not be reached for comment. But district administrators in a statement to the Seattle Times said the MAP test allows the district to analyze student achievement and measure student improvement.

While it is relatively common for parents and students to organize boycotts of standardized tests, such action is unusual among teachers, said Monty Neill, executive director of FairTest, a group opposed to standardized testing.

"This is a rare phenomenon," Neill said. He added that the only other similar incident he can recall occurred at least 10 years ago in Chicago.

McBride said she hopes Seattle's newly installed schools superintendent, José Banda, will meet with the teachers to hear their concerns. She does not expect the teachers will be disciplined, she said.

"We don't want a rift with the district," McBride said.


 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+18 # tbcrawford 2013-01-14 13:25
Judging teacher performance on the new bubble-based tests is medieval and reflects the ALEC-inspired agenda to privatize education with vouchers, subsidized charter schools and other schemes. Who do you want to teach your children? Teachers dedicated to inspiring students with creative, dedicated and informed practices or robots "teaching" a specified page each day from a corporate, one-size-fits-a ll textbook? One of the most basic skills a child must learn is critical thinking and the most important quality to stimulate is curiosity. I want a teacher to inspire my child to dream and then understand school is about acquiring the tools to reach this dream. Teachers offer one of the best jobs programs so urgently needed to stimulate our economy-- and, the benefits would be long-lasting. So Bravo, Seattle teachers. May your protest bring some sense to this debate!
 
 
+11 # DaveM 2013-01-14 13:27
Thanks God for that. Schools are supposed to provide an education, not to teach students how to pass tests. The former is a process of gaining now only knowledge, but the ability to use it. The latter is roughly akin to B.F. Skinner's experiments with pigeons.
 
 
+3 # in deo veritas 2013-01-14 19:31
also roughly akin to the technique of rote memorization practiced a century or so ago. Works with multiplication table but doesn't teach one to think rationally. Maybe that is in fact what the powers that be don't want-a thinking public.
 
 
+2 # in deo veritas 2013-01-14 19:28
Bravo to these brave teachers! I would like to see it spread nationwide. As a career educator, I too found the standardized tests a waste of time and the taxpayers money. It has been common knowledge that most of these are set up by peop[le without actual teaching experience or in some cases companies hired who reflect political bias in what they produce. I shudder at what the standardized tests given students in texas look like. No doubt totally unbased on scientific or historical facts. If forced to teach to these tests you have nothing but brainwashing-no t education. Of course the ultimate goal is to get students in lock step just as it has been done to adults. Real education requires one to question everything in a search for truth-not blindly beleiving everything they see in print, on TV, or on the web.
 
 
-1 # elmont 2013-01-16 16:29
For a different take on this issue, see Danny Westneat's column in today's Seattle Times. Columnists don't come much more progressive and grounded in common sense than Danny--and he takes issue with this boycott.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN