Cave and Saad report: "Dozens of bodies, possibly more than 200, were found Saturday in a town outside Damascus, raising the specter of a massacre by Syrian troops as bad as any atrocity committed since the Syrian uprising began nearly 18 months ago."
Activists claim the bodies found outside Damascus were a result of 'execution-style' killings by Assad's regime. (photo: AFP/Reuters)
Dozens of Bodies Found in Town Outside Damascus
26 August 12
ozens of bodies, possibly more than 200, were found Saturday in a town outside Damascus, raising the specter of a massacre by Syrian troops as bad as any atrocity committed since the Syrian uprising began nearly 18 months ago.
The circumstances and number of deaths in the town, a suburb named Daraya, could not be confirmed independently, and the reported death toll varied.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based group with a network of activists inside Syria, said early Saturday that there were 40 to 50 bodies, while another activist organization, the Local Coordination Committees, raised the toll to more than 200 that night.
The latter group said its activists found one mass body dump after another. They posted two videos showing what they said were different groups of victims; in one a series of charred bodies could be seen wrapped in blankets; in another, a far larger group of bodies - more than 150, according to the video's narrator - had been lined up together in a dark area of what was said to be a local mosque.
Activists said most of the people killed were executed by government forces, who have been shelling the town for days as part of a scorched-earth campaign by Syrian troops to wipe out rebels and their sympathizers in several suburbs of the capital.
Most of the victims appeared to be men, but the Daraya Coordination Committee, a branch of the Local Coordination Committees, said the dead included eight members of a single family, including three children and their mother.
That family could not be seen in the videos, which did not include details identifying the location, time or the sex of the victims.
Still, the violence described by the activists in Daraya fit a pattern of deaths that has begun to emerge after raids by government forces in several suburbs of Damascus. Over the past week, activists repeatedly reported that Syrian soldiers had invaded towns where rebels had control, only to leave piles of bodies behind.
In most cases, according to photos and video from activists, the victims have been young men who appear to have been shot in the head, but there have also been cases in which the victims appear to have been killed by shelling.
According to the Syrian Observatory's tally, August has been among the deadliest months of the conflict, and Daraya seems to have suffered an especially brutal campaign.
Activists said that the town, about four miles southwest of Damascus, held an important rebel armory and also a warehouse of food that they said appeared to have alarmed the Syrian troops, who blamed the entire community for supporting the opposition forces.
On Saturday night, the Local Coordination Committees said there were more bodies in the streets of the town that could not be reached because of snipers.
The government, in statements through its state news agencies, did not specifically mention Daraya on Saturday.
It has generally said very little about the campaign outside Damascus, but its usual explanation for raids involves what it describes as efforts to rid communities of "terrorists," its label for insurgents and their supporters.
Experts have said extrajudicial killings were a particularly Syrian brand of counterinsurgency, in which fear has been the dominant tool.
The challenge in this case will be confirming exactly what occurred. The United Nations observers who reported on previous accusations of human rights violations - in Houla, for example, where the United Nations confirmed in May that Syrian troops killed more than 100 people, including at least 32 children - have left Syria without plans to return.
Journalists did not appear to have reached the area by Saturday night.
Fighting also continued Saturday across the country, from Aleppo in the west to Deir al-Zour in the east.
Meanwhile, as the death toll grew inside Syria, the war's reach into Lebanon appeared to be receding, at least for now.
On Saturday, a Shiite family that had abducted dozens of Syrians inside Lebanon said that it would let all but a few of the captives go, and Syrian rebels released one of 11 Lebanese pilgrims kidnapped in May.
It was not clear if the releases were connected, but they both brought calm to a crisis that had seemed destined to escalate.
North of Beirut, in Tripoli, a cease-fire also seemed to hold after five days of extended gun battles between Lebanese Sunnis and Alawites loyal to Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad.
Maher al-Mikdad, the spokesman for the family that kidnapped more than 30 Syrians in retaliation for the abduction of a relative earlier this month in Syria, told reporters that his family let most of the captives go "as a good-will gesture."
He said that in order to press for the release of his relative, Hassan al-Mikdad, the Mikdad clan would hold four Syrians who he said were members of the Free Syrian Army, the main group of rebel fighters in Syria, and a Turkish man who was also kidnapped.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
This is pure speculation and propaganda. It is far more likely that the murders were committed by the proxy armies fighting against Syria. Let's try to be analytical here. Robert Ford was appointed by Obama as the US Ambassador to Syria just a few months before the uprising began. Ford was assistant ambassador in Iraq under John Negroponte during the surge. Once characteristic of the surge was "death squads" and mass killings.
We we are seeing in Syria the standard practice of US counter-insurge ncy war. Negroponte is the master of this. When he ran the counter-insurge ncy wars in latin America during the 80s such massacres were common and they were always blamed on the Sandinistas, FMLN, or other groups the US was fighting. That's why the US proxies massacre people -- as a propaganda measure designed to turn americans against the people the US is fighting, in this case the Syrian peopl and president Assad.
There were the same kinds of massacres done by US proxies in Yugoslavia.
The NY Times always plays its role of disinformation and propaganda. In short, the NY Times lies.
Here's the test -- if the US were to pull its proxy fighters out of Syria, the massacres would stop
"Iran has opened a summit bringing together more than 120 nations that call themselves "non-aligned", with an appeal to rid the world of nuclear weapons" where is this information in US media?
it is censored as ordered by "our ONLY friends in the Middle East" ... making the world TOTALITARIAN begins with censorship. Egypt president is attending - first visit of Iran since 1979 - VIVA ARAB SPRING (and there are already media attack on Egypt ... our dictator is gone ..)
If Israel which is also a sovereign state committed similar acts, you can bet these hypocrites would be accusing that government of war crimes.
But just because the American government opposes the actions of Syria, therefore in these critics eyes, the latter can do no wrong.
Bravo for your perceptive comment. It is telling indeed that none of the other comments say anything about the nature of the Syrian regime. It is one thing to oppose US intervention abroad (as i most certainly do) but it is quite another to then defend the regime in the country in which the US wants to intervene. The Syrian regime (like all of the other middle east authoritarian dictatorships) have brutalized their own people for decades (Gaddifi may have been "progressive" at one point when he nationalized Libya's oil and used the money to give Libyans free housing, health care, education, and a guaranteed minimum income, etc., but then he abandoned all of this and alligned himself with the western neoliberalcons) . The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend and need to learn how to oppose US militarist/impe rialist interventions abroad without lending our support to brutal regimes.
http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/syria-civilians-bear-brunt-battle-aleppo-rages-2012-08-23
I think the more appropriate question is by what stretch of the imagination can we consider any of the current Arab regimes (and we could include non-arab middle eastern states like Iran as well) are genuinely progressive? Other than Gaddafi's early years (as well as Nasser's Egypt and Mosedech's Iran) when i think a case can be made, for all of his many problems, that he was genuinely a progressive figure (particularly given the other regimes in the area) especially when it comes to distributing the countries oil money to its people (e.g., the guaranteed minimum income) but he abandoned much if not all of his early progressive policies over the years and particularly in the last years after he "made peace" with the west and embraced much of their neoliberal agenda. I don't see how anyone professing to be a progressive, let alone a leftist, can defend any of these regimes. They have brutalized their own people for decades (including targeting the secular left which is why people had no option other than the Mosque and the fundamentalists ) which, to be clear, is not to say that we should then support US military intervention (just as i think we should have opposed it in the Balkans).
...unlawful killings and ill-treatment of captives by opposition fighters belonging to a plethora of armed opposition groups, including the Free Syrian Army (FSA), operating in the city.
Amnesty International has repeatedly called on the FSA leadership to take steps to put an immediate end to such abuses and to ensure that these and any other KILLINGS of captives be investigated impartially.
It's sad to see that a comment such as yours gets (currently) 3 thumbs down (actually 4 since i gave you a thumbs up) and that there is still such a knee-jerk reaction from much of what passes as "the left" in this country such that if a country "opposes" the US (or appears to) they are "good" no matter what and everything they are being accused of is written off as "CIA propaganda." Why does it never occur to these types that one can oppose US militarist adventurism abroad without embracing brutal reactionary regimes (who very often first perscuted their own indigenous "left").
RSS feed for comments to this post