Sherwood writes: The presidential candidate is to say in a speech in Israel that stopping Iran's nuclear arms capability must be the 'highest priority.'
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney shakes hands with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu before a meeting at the Prime Minister's office in Jerusalem, Israel, 07/29/12. (photo: Getty Images)
Romney 'Backs Israeli Strike on Iran'
29 July 12
US presidential candidate to say in speech in Israel that stopping Iran's nuclear arms capability must be 'highest priority'.
itt Romney would back unilateral military action by Israel against Iran's nuclear sites, a senior aide said as the presumptive Republican candidate embarked on a series of high-level meetings in Jerusalem.
"If Israel has to take action on its own, in order to stop Iran from developing that capability, the governor would respect that decision," Dan Senor, Romney's senior national security aide, told reporters accompanying the candidate.
Romney arrived in Israel on Saturday evening for a brief visit, during which he will meet the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, and president, Shimon Peres, as well as the Palestinian prime minister, Salam Fayyad. The visit is aimed at reinforcing Romney's support for Israel and his personal friendship with Netanyahu, and appealing to Jewish voters in the US ahead of November's presidential contest.
He will also make a speech on Sunday on foreign policy and US-Israeli relations. It is expected to focus on the Iranian nuclear issue and the common interests of Israel and the US.
In comments echoing Netanyahu's position that a nuclear Iran is the biggest threat to the Jewish people since the Holocaust, Romney will say: "We have seen the horrors of history. We will not stand by. We will not watch them play out again."
Preventing the Iranian regime developing a nuclear weapons capability "must be our highest national security priority," Romney will say according to excerpts of the speech released in advance. "The security of Israel is in the vital national security interests of the United States."
Romney is seeking to sharply differentiate his position from that of President Obama, who has urged caution on Israel's leaders regarding a military strike against Iran. Sanctions and diplomacy must be given time to reap results, Obama has said.
However, a report in the Israeli daily Haaretz said a senior US official briefed Netanyahu on America's contingency plans for possible military action in the event of sanctions and diplomacy failing.
National security adviser Tom Donilon, who visited Israel two weeks ago, shared details of the preparations, including US weaponry and military capability for striking underground facilities, during a three-hour meeting with the Israeli prime minister, according to the report which was sourced to "a senior American official".
The timing of the story suggests a desire by the administration to pre-empt Romney's presentation of himself as a more robust supporter of tough action against Iran.
However, the report was denied by a senior Israeli official. "Nothing in the article is correct. Donilon did not meet the prime minister for dinner, he did not meet him one-on-one, nor did he present operational plans to attack Iran," said the official, speaking anonymously.
Romney's efforts to win over American Jewish voters are having limited success, according to a recent opinion poll, which puts support for Obama at 68% among US Jews compared with 25% for the Republican candidate. Although a drop from the 75% of American Jews who backed Obama in the 2008 election, the latest figures also represent sliding support for Romney compared with a Gallup poll in June, which gave 29% of the Jewish vote to the Republican and 64% to Obama.
Romney has attacked the US president – who has not visited the Jewish state since his election – for publicly criticising Israel. Although custom dictates that presidential candidates refrain from criticising their opponents while abroad, in his speech Romney will reiterate the strong ties between the US and Israel.
"We're part of the great fellowship of democracies. We speak the same language of freedom and justice, and the right of every person to live in peace. We serve the same cause and provoke the same hatreds in the same enemies of civilisation," he will say.
Romney's visit falls on the Jewish religious day of Tisha B'Av, a day of fasting and mourning the destruction of the First and Second Temples. A fundraising event had to be postponed until Monday morning when it was realised it had been scheduled before the end of the fast at sunset.
Romney and his wife, Ann, are scheduled to dine with the Netanyahus at their residence on Sunday evening. Netanyahu and Romney have had a warm personal relationship since working together in the US in the 1970s. Following controversy over the candidate's comments on the preparedness of London to host the Olympic Games, his aides will be anxious to avoid further gaffes. Media access to events during the visit has been tightly restricted, and there are expected to be no opportunities to put questions to Romney.
The media has been barred from access to Monday's fund-raiser at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, at which the minimum donation from participants is $50,000. Among those expected to attend is Sheldon Adelson, a high-profile billionaire Jewish American casino magnate and major supporter of and donor to the Romney campaign. Adelson also owns Israel Hayom, Israel's biggest circulation newspaper, which is distributed free and takes a strong pro-Netanyahu line.
The Romney entourage is to fly to Poland on Monday.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
But Jews should beware of Romney. He and his religion do not recognize them as practioners of a legitimate religion. They want to baptize them after death. they want to dig up dead Jews so they can be baptized.
The zionist extremists are dragging the US into more wars than it can win or even fund. The result will not be the collapse of Iran, Libya, Syria or any other muslim nation. they are resiliant. They will rebuild. the collapse will be the US which will not rebuild.
1. We would need to put 1,000,000 combat troops on the ground continuously for 20 years .... or until, like Viet Nam,. Iraq & now Afghanistan, we simply give up and pull out.
2. We'd have to reinstate the draft.
3. WE CANNOT enter another war without serious fax increases for all.
4. War with Iran would cost $20+ trillion over 20, years and we would STILL lose.
5.We are not the most popular country on Earth - only the strongest, but,. BUT, not THAT strong. . If we were to get bogged down in Persia, our myriad undeclared enemies would eat our lunch all lover the world.
6. Iran is NEITHER another hollowed out, pre-softened Iraq NOR a backward, rural Afghanistan. If we let Israel sucker us into attacking Iran, you can expect immediate, serious, deadly, repercussions here in the USA and worldwide,
At this instant Iran has the capacity to shut down every one of our maritime ports on both coasts for months, and to engage our naval forces in the Straits of Hormuz effectively.
We MUST initiate direct talks with Iran as an equal - ASAP. The opening statement would be "Mistakes have been made, and we deplore those mistakes - BUT the time has come to put those mistakes behind us and act together in the interests of a just and lasting peace in the Middle Eaat." PERIOD!
Why hasn't the US gone in and overthrown that hostile regime? Oh wait, we did...in the 50's. We deposed the democratically elected Mossadegh and installed the murderous Shah and his Savak thugs. Dam those pesky governments that refuse to remain US puppets.
the last time Iran attacked another country was more than 200 years ago when the Persians (it wasn't even Iran until 1935) attacked Basra in what is today, Iraq.
Thanks, dkonstruction.
You also have evidently not kept up with the amount of defensive weapons the U.S. maintains and is constantly attempting to expand with cooperating countries, thereby pissing off neighboring countries.
If anybody is lobbing big ones, it is the U.S.
Wait until Jan. 2013.
An all out attack on Iran will only send petroleum prices much, much higher. While increasing calls for dangerous ideas like Keystone XL pipelines.
Does anyone think that Israel will back us? I should think not. This sort of rhetoric causes new and worse holocausts and for greater groups. Will Ben Net be on the battlefield? WIll Romney get his sorry self in front of a bullet to save another American. You can bet there is no way.
The will cost Mitt a substantial number of votes because not all of the US are Zionist Christians and racism is still alive and well here.
Iran has not attacked another country in more than 200 years. Can you say the same for US?
So, who has a real reason to fear the other?
Of course he'll say that. He is backed by Super Wealthy Corporatists. Think of ALL the very highly lucrative contract possibilities those people must be drooling over at the prospect of getting THEIR Romney elected and him going after Iran with an insane major military strike.
That's what its all about folks..! MONEY...!
Think even of what the Koch brothers would save on payroll without a Social Security Tax.
ETC...!
GREED.. pure unadulterated GREED runs America now... AND... its what is DESTROYING America right along with the Global Economy too.
WHERE OH WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE...??
Maybe the better questions are-- Why are so many Americans going along with all of this, even supporting it...?... And... Why are so many Americans who can see it and despise it all so passively accepting it..?
Yet again, the Rethugs are giving us another chicken-hawk who will mindlessly and happily wave the flag, put his hand on his heart and send thousands of young people to death, dismemberment and/or insanity for military/corpor ate gain but never spent a day in the field of conflict himself -unless you count his moronic Mormon missionary days in France; must have seemed pretty tough in a mostly non-religious un-American country capable of reason.
I know that Obama's record in this sense is pretty poor too but the Roamin' one is beyond belief -just to make political points.
I have to say it again, "Only in America"!
Exactly as I believed he would.
Guns or Butter - we know what Romney's choice would be.
Welcome to Nazi Germany in 1939!
Will his base be licking their chops knowing that he just gave Israel the green light to launch a military strike against Iran? Really? Or will some hesitate for a second or two and wonder about it's disastrous implications?
I don't see his richey-rich kids in uniform, posted in the Gulf, ready to take on the Iranian Navy/Air Force if this thing goes bad.
There will be serious damage to both sides. All for bluster and dreams of regime change.
Many Muslims disprove of 9/11, and since we had a movie theater terrorized we might finally notice that huge number of Muslims don't like it when sports and religious events are attacked.
There are 6,000 Mormon's in Indonesia and in Malaysia, if extremists attack Mormon's, the government might want to be evenhanded in any local conflicts between Mormons and Muslims. Talking his religion extremely seriously Romney may want Mormon refugees from his tough foreign policy to come the the US. Harry Reed, a Mormon, and Mitt Romney are very different on policy except they both agree on Islam. President Bush was close friends with certain Saudi's and welcomed Muslims into his faith-based initiatives, every recent President was partial to certain Muslims.
Jon Huntsman not Romney would help the Mormon Church gain respectability. Pakistan had a women President and the mistreatment of women drastically increased, Having a President a Japanese ancestry did nothing to advance the small Japanese ethnic community in Peru.
After the November they will have to deliver - bomb Iran (there is NO evidence that Iran will have WMD capabilities in the next ten years). The Gaza genocide was committed also after US election 4 years ago - Obama fully informed.
Ron Paul ?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvA_sQHqIzE
Please listen and comment -
Israel internal situation is also in flux - but people are better informed than in US (haaretz.com)
Wonder if anyone will bring up the fact that Mormons slaughtered settlers moving west because they were deemed unacceptable?
Last week I got an email from some rightwing nutcase complaining about how Obama wasn't totally supporting Israel. He is of the opinion that starting another war in the MidEast is a good idea. Why, I haven't the vaguest idea.
Netanyahu embraces Romney as no Israeli prime minister has ever before embraced a candidate running against an incumbent U.S. president."
www.haaretz.com/in-jerusalem-speech-it-was-romney-s-voice-but-netanyahu-s-words.premium-1.454521
how humiliating to American people - now waiting for the ONE mass media to at least paraphrase haaretz - not a chance in US money culture rules all ...
American politicians raising money in foreign countries?! Or is Israel the 51st state.
Israel is dictating US foreign policy and more and more domestic policy. Hope that this backfires ...
Although I'm not a Jew man today, I will be tomorrow after the circumcision. But to prove my allegiance to God on Kolob, my foreskin will be put on ice and reattached once I return to Anglo Saxon (Aryan) land.
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/330-131/12670-romney-backs-israeli-strike-on-iran#comment-203844
We don't have to spread hatred of Mormons. However if Romney if serious about a tough foreign policy, that doesn’t single out al Qaeda, some Muslims would consider it a Mormon foreign policy.
Many Mormons in the Republican convention are Romney delegates and if Ron Paul does managed to prevent a first ballot victory, many of them would find Jon Huntsman acceptable. In addition the Mormons in Hong Kong would benefit greatly, and religious freedom in the rest of China would improve somewhat. The Mormon religion is in flux, Huntsman's shining example would improve it.
RSS feed for comments to this post