RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "As global starvation spreads, charities warn that the total number of severely malnourished children is also rising."

Assan Adaman, a 33-year-old mother of six, has lived in the same village in Kedougou, Senegal, all her life. A rice farmer, she is used to producing six bags in a good season; last year, production levels were cut in half. As she runs low on food, she is worried about the next few months and how she will ensure her children have enough to eat. (photo: The Independent UK)
Assan Adaman, a 33-year-old mother of six, has lived in the same village in Kedougou, Senegal, all her life. A rice farmer, she is used to producing six bags in a good season; last year, production levels were cut in half. As she runs low on food, she is worried about the next few months and how she will ensure her children have enough to eat. (photo: The Independent UK)



Almost a Billion Go Hungry Worldwide

By Sarah Morrison, The Independent UK

06 August 12

 

As global starvation spreads, charities warn that the total number of severely malnourished children is also rising.

n unparalleled number of severe food shortages has added 43 million to the number of people going hungry worldwide this year. And millions of children are now at risk of acute malnutrition, charities are warning. One week ahead of David Cameron's "hunger summit", they say that unless action is taken urgently, many more could fall victim.

For the first time in recent history, humanitarian organisations have had to respond to three serious food crises - in West Africa, Yemen and East Africa - in the past 12 months, according to Oxfam. Almost a billion people are now hungry - one in seven of the global population - and the number of acutely malnourished children has risen for the first time this decade.

But these issues are well known. When the hunger crisis hit the headlines last year, it was only after famine had already been declared in Somalia, killing an estimated 100,000 people and affecting 12 million. Needless deaths occurred and millions of extra dollars were spent simply because the international community had failed to act on early warnings.

The Harry Potter actress Bonnie Wright, 21, has just returned from Senegal, a country in the Sahel region of West and Central Africa, where more than 18 million people are threatened by food shortages. She told The Independent on Sunday: "We are now at a moment where we can prevent a famine. That's the most powerful position we could be in - to help now, rather than wait until we're in such an extreme situation that we're already losing people by the second."

Charities are urging David Cameron to announce the "biggest ever push on hunger" at his global nutrition event, to be held next week to coincide with the closing day of the Olympics. World leaders, NGOs and leading business people are expected to attend - and among other issues, it is expected that the Prime Minister will announce targets to reduce the number of under-fives- currently the figure is 180 million - who suffer from irreversible physical and mental stunting as a result of poor nutrition. More than two and a half million children die from malnutrition each year.

Barbara Stocking, Oxfam GB's chief executive, called the summit "a positive step forward", but stressed: "It must be the start of concerted action to address the shocking fact that while we produce enough food to feed everyone on the planet, about a billion will tonight go to bed hungry.

"Dwindling natural resources and the gathering pace of climate change mean that without urgent action, things will only get worse, and multiple major crises could quickly move from being an exception to being the norm."

She added that Mr Cameron should call for increased investment in small farmers, greater transparency in commodity markets and an end to biofuel subsidies.

If the world failed to listen when charities warned about the food crisis in the Horn of Africa, experts say they must pay attention when it comes to the Sahel. Six million people are already facing severe food insecurity in the region, and more than a million children are at risk of severe malnutrition.

Cycles of drought combined with low levels of agricultural investment, environmental degradation, high population growth and acute levels of poverty contribute to a context of "chronic" vulnerability, according to Oxfam. Conflict in Mali and high food prices - across the region food prices are higher by on average 25 to 50 per cent compared with the last five-year average - have exacerbated the crisis. The charity has launched an appeal and is aiming to reach 1.8 million people with emergency assistance across Senegal, Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Niger and Gambia.

Justin Forsyth, chief executive of Save the Children, said the region was in a "permanent food crisis". He added: "It is lurching from one crisis to the next. One bad year tips families over the edge, and the world responds to the emergency, but this is the tip of the iceberg. Below the surface, there is a huge ongoing crisis we don't address."

The Prime Minister told The IoS that he and Brazil's Vice President, Michel Temer, who is co-hosting next week's event, want to "use the summit to find new ways of tackling malnutrition - fostering innovation in biotechnology, encouraging stronger co-operation between governments and ensuring better accountability by Governments who receive aid".

He added that he hopes to "agree a package of measures" to "transform the lives of millions of children" before the Rio Olympics. Save the Children estimates that there will be four million more stunted children by the next Games, if current trends continue.

Unicef UK said that lack of nutrition is the "silent challenge" to global development. In 2008, eight of world's leading economists, including five Nobel laureates, ranked providing young children with micronutrients as the most cost-effective way to advance global welfare.

David Cameron added: "For every £1 spent effectively tackling malnutrition, £30 of benefit is generated."

Case Studies

Assan Adaman, a 33-year-old mother of six, has lived in the same village in Kédougou, Senegal, all her life. A rice farmer, she is used to producing six bags in a good season; last year, production levels were cut in half. As she runs low on food, she is worried about the next few months and how she will ensure her children have enough to eat.

"I grew rice last year, but three bags is not enough to feed my family. I'm really worried about how I will feed them over the next few months, as we approach a bad period. I can't be calm when my children do not have enough to eat; I have to keep them healthy. We have to rely on our neighbours and our communities to help us through these harder times.

"When I receive Oxfam money, I will be able to give my children food. But I hope that the future will change for my children when they grow up."

Aissatou Kanle is a 40-year-old father of eight, living in Kédougou. He is a maize and rice farmer by trade but now works as a miner - a six-hour round trip from home - to feed his family, which he has left behind.

"Last year the maize was destroyed by floods, then rain destroyed my rice harvest. So, over the last year, I didn't have enough rice or maize to sell or for my family to eat... I had to go and find work building toilets in the mines, so I could raise money to give to my wife to provide for 10 people in my family. I had to walk three hours there and back but with very little food inside me.

"The future for my family is education. I can't just feed them without seeing them go to school, and yet I can't let them go to school without them eating, but I will fight. I don't want to see them having the same life as me."

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+2 # Underledge 2012-08-06 09:13
What do people think happens when we breed like mice? Even shortages of food doesn't stop us. Mother Nature has a way of dealing with us.
 
 
+2 # dkonstruction 2012-08-06 12:35
Quoting Underledge:
What do people think happens when we breed like mice? Even shortages of food doesn't stop us. Mother Nature has a way of dealing with us.


While i agree that population growth is a problem there is currently enough food to feed everyone on the planet. Shortages are not "natural"; they are created by us in large measure to keep people controlled. Food prices spiked a couple of years ago not because of weather or lack of supply or increased demand but due to speculators in the futures markets. People are not going hungry in this world becuase we are "breeding like mice" or because there is not enough food to feed everyone but because of the greed and inhuman exploitation of global capital.
 
 
+1 # Glen 2012-08-06 14:36
Whoa, dkonstruction, there IS overpopulation, drought, flooding, hurricanes, tornadoes, you name it, and all of it is going to deplete food production. The more people there are, the more people will need to be fed.

"Inhuman exploitation of global capital" is only one aspect of the issue. The more people there are on the planet, the more food will be needed.

Population control at one time was of serious concern. It should be again.
 
 
0 # dkonstruction 2012-08-07 12:57
Glen, I agree that all of these are serious problems and was certainly not trying to suggest that overpopulation is not a problem that we need to deal with (particularly here in the US where unlike the rest of the developed world our population continues to increase dramatically).

But i still maintain (and those that work on food issues seem to agree) that there is enough food (currently) on the planet to feed everyone so the problem is not a "food shortage." The problem is in how we distribute what is produced (which i would maintain is a function of global capitalism as are global food prices which have been shown to now be under the same control by speculators that energy prices are) as well as how capitalist agriculture (i.e., agribusiness has destroyed much of the traditional methods of farming which have been used for thousands of years (such that now in much of Africa people are being forced into the global marketplace via the same type of "enclosures" as were first practiced in England and which were needed in order to create the mass of wage laborers the emerging capitalist system needed in the first place).

And, i think we do have to come to terms with the fact that most so-called "natural disasters" are in fact not natural at all but rather human made due to how we practice "development" (Katrina in the US would be a good recent domestic example).
 
 
+1 # Glen 2012-08-07 17:14
OK, gotcha. The corruption surrounding food supplies, though, is a major factor in who gets to eat and who doesn't. Who distributes that food is a huge factor. There will be only enough food for a time, but all the issues discussed will come into play in the destruction of food supply or lack thereof.

As you say, the farming methods of countries around the world who practiced traditional methods are being taken over by major corporations.

And yes, natural disasters are going to intrude on all manner of farming, including those that are most likely man made. The HAARP is quite successful in this effort.
 
 
+2 # The Voice of Reason 2012-08-07 15:28
The law of supply and demand is the most degrading, offensive to human dignity economic law on the books. Supply is manipulated to enrich people who should be in prison.

Take the oil companies. Every time there is tension in the ME, they say the price must go up b/c the supply line might be disrupted. When has the supply line EVER BEEN DISRUPTED ????
 
 
0 # Glen 2012-08-07 17:02
I agree, Voice. Oddly enough, I had the supply and demand discussion just this morning. Nothing but an excuse to push.
 
 
+2 # Glen 2012-08-06 10:33
I agree with you Underledge. Between the destruction of the land, pollution, takeovers by such as Monsanto, warming, and over-population , there will be no way to feed everyone. No way.

It cannot be said enough, and folks should be saying it and discussing it and fighting to save it all, every day. There can be no population control without education and constant reminders to the citizens of the planet to stop having babies. Let's take care of the ones we have now.
 
 
+3 # Michael Lee Bugg 2012-08-06 13:44
The article said, "Dwindling natural resources and the gathering pace of climate change mean that without urgent action, things will only get worse, and multiple major crises could quickly move from being an exception to being the norm.". I have said since the 70's that there are way too many people, but the blindly religious and the just blind refuse to accept or even see that fact. We passed the real capacity for humans on this galactic oasis in 1830 when we reached one billion people. I hate to sound heartless, but for the sake of mankind and the balanced, healthy ecosystem we depend on, we should not feed those who cannot feed themselves. And yes, I know that we throw away enough food in this country everyday that could feed millions of people, but if climate change reduces our food production substantially that surplus and wastefulness may soon be
gone!
 
 
+2 # Glen 2012-08-06 14:55
Years ago, Michael, a friend of mine loosely quoted the Bible by stating "the meek shall inherit the earth", not meaning the same as the bible. The meaning was that the meek, in his mind, would take the earth because they, in their desperation to survive and not starve, would push to take over more privileged nations. Not too long after that there was talk of the wealthy nations making an attempt to protect themselves and their borders from the starving.

Just as many other moral dilemmas, such as who would you let into your bomb shelter if you had enough food for only your family, we are faced with coming major starvation. Who is to survive?

You presented that next moral dilemma: Should we feed those who cannot feed themselves. Should make for some serious discussion concerning morals vs. survival.
 
 
+1 # Majikman 2012-08-06 22:42
Scientists tell us we are in a 6th major die-off, losing species at an alarming rate....fish, frogs, bees, mammals etc. Since the planet is interconnected our days are numbered. The number is the interesting part. Scientist predict that between the next 300 to 2,000 years it will get serious. Who's to say it couldn't be earlier, given how the predictions on climate change were off the mark. In the hierarchy of needs, without survival morals are moot.
With the solutions of "bio-technology " (Monsanto etal) being proposed as the answer by many governments, we many just escalate our own demise.
 
 
+1 # Glen 2012-08-07 12:23
You are correct, Majikman, when you declare morals will be moot. I was speaking of imminent future and the discussion among those who care, and the ultimate urge to survive.

The reports I read during the '90's did not give the Earth 300 to 2000 years. It was given 30 because of the destruction of the atmosphere. These are folks who studied the atmosphere all of their adult lives. Certainly, there has been much research since that time, but there are definite biological and chemical actions on this planet relative to the atmosphere and pollution that remain in play.

Reptiles and amphibians are the canary in the coal mine relative to the environment. The die offs you mention are real, and many are a total mystery. Others have definitely been identified as pollution or UV radiation. When herps are suffering, all life forms are at risk.
 
 
+2 # dovelane1 2012-08-07 00:26
According to another blog site, the current average temperature in this country (and possibly the world) is now 1 degree F. more than it was during the Dust Bowl era in the 1930's. Land management practices were very poor at the time, which was a main cause for the Dust Bowl. The only reason we are currently holding our own, is that we now employ better land management practices.

It was stated that if we don't change our priorities regarding CO2 in the next five years, the average temperature could go up as much as 9 to 10 degrees F. in the near future. Think what the droughts, fires, and volatile weather would look like then.

Barry commoner said that by the time the average person understands what is happening, it will be too late.

Then we have the richest 1% who will do everything in their power to protect their fortunes, and little to nothing to save the planet - unless they can make money doing it. Companies like Nestle are buying up water rights, and bottling the water, and selling it back to people in plastic bottles.

The late syndicated columnist Sydney Harris wrote that the American Revolution took place to create a 'quality' of life for all people. How much would the U.S. change, and then the world, if our priority, and everyone's energies, were directed towards the quality of life for all, rather than the quantity of life.
 
 
0 # Glen 2012-08-07 12:02
Who is funding these missions to Mars, dovelane1? The wealthiest on the planet. The wealthiest on the planet will be the first to leave the devastation they created, to live in domed cities and underground facilities on Mars or wherever the hell they determine is worth exploiting.

They are the ones who will determine priorities, but it will not include the bulk of the Earth's population. Nor will it include quality of life for most of us.
 
 
+4 # RMDC 2012-08-07 01:48
What a fucked up world we live in. All human beings have a right to decent food, shelter, a means of living. While there is a natural component to this tragedy, the man made part is the worst part. People are being driven from good farmland in Africa in order to make way for farms that raise crops for export to the west where there is an epidemic of obesity. American die of over eating while African die of under eating.

The period of history we live in is one in which the rich are stealing everything from the poor. They steal the water, the land, the food.

Bill Gates is leading the charge to create huge industrial farms in Africa. He says he will increase food production. But in reality, people will be forced off their ancestral land, they will move to city slums, and the food will be coffee or exotic fruit sent to the west.

Small peasant farms are the way to support a vast and diverse population. They keep lots of people employed and they give workers control over their production.
 
 
+1 # The Voice of Reason 2012-08-07 15:35
There is enough food and wealth in the world today for everyone to be well off and cared for. But because materialists want more and more of the economic pie, and because economic laws are written to satisfy and insatiable greed, and politicians and business leaders, and military industrialists, and rich people are insatiably greedy, they get their way.

It is an unsustainable system, and the sooner it crashes under the galling weight of its own iniquities, the better. Which only means it will take for freekin ever, b/c these goons are so sophisticated at greasing their own palms and pushing the envelope.

Where do you plan to be when it all falls down?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN