FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Glantz reports: "The V.A.'s inability to pay benefits to veterans before they die is increasingly common."

Glantz: 'Long wait times are contributing to tens of thousands of veterans being approved for disability benefits and pensions only after it is too late for the money to help them.' (photo: unknown)
Glantz: 'Long wait times are contributing to tens of thousands of veterans being approved for disability benefits and pensions only after it is too late for the money to help them.' (photo: unknown)


Veterans Dying for Care

By Aaron Glantz, The Daily Beast

20 December 12

 

Over the last three years, the number of veterans dying before their claims are processed has skyrocketed, reports Aaron Glantz of the Center for Investigative Reporting.

fter seven months of delay, the Department of Veterans Affairs finally approved World War II veteran James Alderson's pension benefits last week.

But it was not a cause for celebration or relief for Alderson, whose life's work was the farm-supply store he founded near Chico, Calif., after returning home from the Battle of the Bulge.

The 89-year-old veteran had died three months earlier in a Yuba City nursing home.

"My father was a very proud person," Alderson's son, Kale, said. "Whenever I saw him, he would ask if I'd heard from the V.A. and whether his money would hold up. It really took a toll on him."

The V.A.'s inability to pay benefits to veterans before they die is increasingly common, according to data obtained by the Center for Investigative Reporting. The data reveals, for the first time, that long wait times are contributing to tens of thousands of veterans being approved for disability benefits and pensions only after it is too late for the money to help them.

In the fiscal year that ended in September, the agency paid $437 million in retroactive benefits to the survivors of nearly 19,500 veterans who died waiting. The figures represent a dramatic increase from three years earlier, when the widows, parents and children of fewer than 6,400 veterans were paid $7.9 million on claims filed before their loved one's death.

These veterans range from World War II veterans who die of natural causes without their pensions to Iraq War veterans who commit suicide after their disability claims for post-traumatic stress disorder are denied.

The ranks of survivors waiting for these benefits also have surged, from fewer than 3,000 in December 2009 to nearly 13,000 this month.

Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., chairman of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, said the data confirmed the worst fears of many veterans and members of Congress.

"The common refrain we hear from many veterans is, 'Delay, deny, wait till I die,'" said Miller, who called the burgeoning backlog of benefits claims a "national embarrassment."

Nationwide, about 900,000 veterans and their families have been waiting about nine months for a decision on their claims, with those in America's major urban areas waiting the longest. As of October, the most recent month for which numbers are available, the average wait time for a veteran was 15 months in Chicago, 16 months in New York and a year and a half in Los Angeles.

But in a conference call with the Center for Investigative Reporting, V.A. officials said that while the long delays generally were unacceptable, the growth in posthumous payments was not disturbing.

"It's a good thing that the V.A. pays benefits to honor the service of veterans and the sacrifices of their family members despite the fact that a veteran has unfortunately died," said Dave McLenachen, director of the agency's pension and fiduciary service.

Some veterans' advocates say the number of survivors being approved for retroactive payments represents a fraction of the veterans who die waiting because grieving families must file paperwork with the agency to keep a claim from expiring with the veteran.

"You're just so exhausted and drained with the grief of losing a loved one that sometimes it's hard just to wake up in the morning, let alone navigate a complicated bureaucracy," said Bonnie Carroll, founder of the Washington-based nonprofit Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors.

Delays Tied to Agent Orange

In November, more than a year after Vietnam veteran John Conrad died of leukemia, the V.A. sent his widow a letter acknowledging his cancer was caused by exposure to the toxic defoliant Agent Orange.

The decision marked a reversal for the agency, which had denied Conrad's claim for disability benefits for three years while the former Army specialist was still alive. The denials had come despite supporting medical opinions from a series of doctors, including the V.A.'s own oncologist.

"We went through our savings and our retirement money. And then, after he died, they said they made a mistake and sent a check for $79,000," his widow, Linda Conrad, said in an interview at her home outside Phoenix.

By the time the V.A. reversed itself, the family home was in foreclosure. Linda Conrad, who had quit her job as a paralegal to care for her husband during his last days, found her efforts to secure a new job thwarted by the recession.

Yet, in an interview, the VA deemed John Conrad's saga a success, because the more experienced claims processors who handled Conrad's claim after his death had the authority to reinterpret the medical evidence.

"That's the way it's supposed to work," said Brad Flohr, assistant director for policy of the V.A.'s compensation service.

V.A. officials say the agency's changing stance on Agent Orange claims is a major catalyst for the rise in posthumous payments. In 2010, Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki issued a ruling granting benefits to 158,000 Vietnam veterans who suffered from ischemic heart disease, Parkinson's disease. and two types of cancer-neither the kind of leukemia that killed John Conrad-that the agency previously had denied were caused by Agent Orange.

Officials said that decision, a response to a federal court ruling in Northern California, was responsible for about half of the payouts in 2012.

McLenachen attributed the threefold increase in the number of veterans who died awaiting disability and pension benefits to a different phenomenon: a 2008 law that streamlined the ability for survivors to petition the agency for compensation instead of forcing them to file a new claim.

That explanation doesn't resonate with members of Congress who have been increasingly frustrated with the delays veterans face in obtaining benefits.

"It's not plausible," said Rep. Jerry McNerney, a California Democrat and ranking member of the House subcommittee that oversees the VA's benefits bureaucracy. Even under the old system, McNerney said, survivors regularly filed claims for benefits that veterans had requested before they died.

Errors Compound Delays

Veteran advocates and family members of veterans who died waiting accuse the VA of callous indifference in denying legitimate benefits claims and deluging families with paperwork even as loved ones slip away. Chronic mistakes add to a feeling of abandonment.

A Center for Investigative Reporting analysis of 18 reports published this year by the V.A.'s inspector general revealed auditors found mistakes in more than 1 in 3 high-profile claims they reviewed. In 2011, the Board of Veterans Appeals found errors in 73 percent of cases it decided, according to the board's annual report.

"The V.A. has a problem with errors and that lengthens the process and increases the chance that a veteran will die waiting," said Bart Stichman, co-director of the National Veterans Legal Services Program, a Washington-based nonprofit that provides legal assistance to veterans and their families.

Iraq War veteran Scott Eiswert "gave up on life" after receiving a February 2008 letter from the V.A. denying his claim for post-traumatic stress disorder for the third time, according to his widow, Tracy Eiswert. Three months later, the 31-year-old Tennessee National Guardsman shot himself in the head.

Then, in August 2008, the VA reversed itself, sending Tracy Eiswert a letter stating that it "was clearly and unmistakably in error" for failing to grant her husband's disability claim. The agency sent a check for more than $10,000 to cover the disability benefits Scott Eiswert should have received while he was alive. The VA also deemed his suicide related to his military service, entitling his widow to a $1,195 monthly survivor's benefit.

"I was relieved to get the check, but if they would have done their job and given him the help he needed immediately, maybe this wouldn't have happened," Tracy Eiswert said.


 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+6 # Patriot 2012-12-20 21:30
This is a disgusting disgrace!

If you support the men and women of our Armed Forces,
please write to your representatives and senators and insist that they find money in the budget to make good on our long-standing promises to care for those injured in the line of duty, preferably BEFORE they die.

These are the same, people, by the way, that President Obama is trying to protect by using drones, rather than their all-too-easily damaged bodies, to subdue opposing forces.

NOTE: If you are a veteran of service in Vietnam, you should apply to the VA for medical care for just about any ongoing health problem, because it probably is related to your exposure to Agent Orange.

On the other hand, if you are able to manage on the other resources you have at your disposal, have mercy on the current crop of veterans, and clear the field to give them the best possible chance. No group of veterans ever has been so mistreated, so poorly led, and so abandoned when their service ended.

The rest of you, next time someone starts beating the drum for war, please remember what has happened to these faithful men and women. If you're not willing to serve in a cause you deem worth their service, then don't support that cause.
 
 
+9 # bingers 2012-12-21 03:08
Thanks to good ol' Dubya for starting two illegal wars at the same time as cutting funding for the VA and Republican refusal to increase the budget for them.
 
 
+5 # Glen 2012-12-21 05:49
Yes, indeed, bingers, and attacks on still more countries continue. I contribute to Paralyzed Veterans and have always found it disturbing that there must be these organizations to assist veterans rather than the government that sent them in to be maimed.
 
 
+6 # mdhome 2012-12-21 06:56
The costs of providing care to vets MUST be included in the cost of doing war, If we can spend so much for the DoD, they MUST use those funds for rehabilitating the vets when they come home and grow old with numerous ills that are inevitable. I find it incredible that those congressmen who are so gung-ho to go to war, are the ones so tight-fisted with providing for the aftermath of their actions.
 
 
+4 # fuzzbuzz 2012-12-21 09:54
Seems illogical to expect that the mass murderers who declare these wars would somehow "care" about their own. You can't expect loyalty, compassion, or even intelligence from war criminals.

The only way these agressions can end is when the soldiers REFUSE to serve. This was the primary reason the Vietnam War ended. The troops should realize that they're just pawns in this war game. They're just the cost of doing business, and revelations like this reinforce precisely that message. If the leaders cared about the lives of their people, they wouldn't have declared these pointless wars in the first place.

Given that all the wars that this country was involved in in the last century were acts of aggression (except maybe WWII), it's difficult for me to feel compassion for many of these vets. I'm willing to bet that they're STILL living better than their victims lived in their wake.

Cruel, I know, but important. War crimes can't happen if people refuse to partake in them. This gives people another reason NOT to.
 
 
+2 # spercepolnes 2012-12-21 15:52
How about a special tax on the 1%'ers - those who profit from the wars these people are sent off too........yeah , right......!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN