RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "More than 2.7 million living people who voted in 2008 have since been purged from the voter rolls. Among those, African American voters are '1.5 times more likely to be purged than Caucasian voters, nationally.'"

Florida's governor, Rick Scott, has justified the purging of the voters roll as necessary to prevent fraud. (photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Florida's governor, Rick Scott, has justified the purging of the voters roll as necessary to prevent fraud. (photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)



Voter Purges Disproportionately Remove Minorities, Seniors, Young People

By Josh Israel, ThinkProgress

03 August 12

 

atalist, a company that provides voting list data to progressive organizations, is among the closest observers of changes to voting rolls around the country. In analysis shared with ThinkProgress, the company observes that since November 2008, certain groups of living residents have been far more likely to be purged from the voting roles than others.

Their data suggests that beyond the wide variation in purge rates across states, there is significant variation within states:

In many states, certain parts of the state electorate, both geographically and demographically, are much more likely to be dropped off of the voter rolls than others. More specifically, some general trends that we see are focused on:
a. Urbanity – cities are getting disproportionately purged
b. Race – minorities are getting disproportionately purged
c. Marital Status – unmarried people are getting disproportionately purged
d. Age – younger (< 40 years old) and older (> 65 years old) voters are purged more frequently than middle-aged voters
e. County effects – there are big differences across county lines, pointing to sharp discontinuities based on arbitrary political boundaries that do not correspond with inherent behavioral differences

Catalist notes that more than 2.7 million living people who voted in 2008 have since been purged from the voter rolls. Among those, African American voters are “1.5 times more likely to be purged than Caucasian voters, nationally.”

These findings are consistent with what we have seen in Florida with Gov. Rick Scott’s (R) error-riddled purge attempts. A Miami Herald analysis showed that “Hispanic, Democratic and independent-minded voters [were] the most likely to be targeted” by that effort.

Rep. John Lewis (D-GA), who led the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee’s efforts in the 1960s to ensure voting rights for all Americans, said last month that these purges of eligible voters from the rolls make him “want to just cry, after people gave a little blood, after some people were beaten, shot and murdered trying to help people become registered voters.” He lamented that “states throughout the nation come along with tactics to make it hard, to make it difficult for people to participate. We should be making it easy and simple and open up the political process and let all of the people come in.”

Instead, Scott and others are pushing efforts that may make it impossible for these millions of U.S. citizens to exercise their right to vote. These numbers show that regardless of whether the intent of these purges is discriminatory, their effect clearly is.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+13 # dkonstruction 2012-08-03 06:24
Where have the vast majority of democrats been on this issue since the 2000 election when the election was stolen due to the at least 20,000 African Americans that were thrown off the voting roles? Except for a few, like Lewis, most have not said or done a damn thing. Just as they ran from ACORN when they were being brought down despite the fact that they were the most effective voter registration organization in the country. Seems like the dems only wake up a few months before each election to then start crying "foul" but by this point it is usually too late. If Obama loses, it may well have nothing to do with the money in politics (though i'm sure that this will be what is blamed just as Nader was the scapegoat for their loss in 2000).

Just as lewis engaged in civil disobedience in the 1960s this may be the only way to push this issue enough into the spotlight to get some real action.
 
 
+5 # dkonstruction 2012-08-03 08:00
i guess the thumbs down means you believe that the dems have been vigorous in their fight for and defense of voting rights since the 2000 debacle? sorry, the facts don't support such a claim. Or was it the Nader comment (sorry, Ralph didn't cost Gore the election --which he won -- but rather the number of African Americans thrown off the roles in Florida which is why the rethugs are trying to do it again). Or was it the call for civil disobedience and if so i guess you opposed those tactics during the civil rights movement (not to mention the women's rights movement, the anti-war movement during Vietnam, etc.

Sorry, but a thumbs down with no comment is just lazy and pseudo-intellec tual masterbation. Was it good for you too?
 
 
+4 # cwilheim 2012-08-03 10:13
There are plenty of us out there working in local Democratic organizations to get people registered. What you don't seem to understand is that even these efforts require money, and Democrats generally don't have money. Too many are focused on contributing only to candidates and fail to support their local committees to make sure these efforts are continued throughout the off years, too.

By the way, what have YOU been doing for the past twelve years?
 
 
-7 # MidwestTom 2012-08-03 07:01
Last week in Tunica Mississippi, a Democratic party official was convicted of voting multiple times. I mention this not because he was a Democrat, but because voter fraud works both ways. I do not know how it could ne arranged, but I think that only people who gave a basic understanding of government and current events should be allowed to vote. We may be creeping toward that, as a growing percentage of voters now call themselves independents; and of truly independent, they probably vote for a reason, not blindly doing as told by either party. To vote for a reason they have to have become aware of something in politics that they like or dislike.
 
 
+13 # pernsey 2012-08-03 07:47
Midwest Tom you said:


"I think that only people who gave a basic understanding of government and current events should be allowed to vote."

You basically are denying yourself the right to vote.
 
 
+8 # dkonstruction 2012-08-03 09:26
Quoting MidwestTom:
Last week in Tunica Mississippi, a Democratic party official was convicted of voting multiple times. I mention this not because he was a Democrat, but because voter fraud works both ways. I do not know how it could ne arranged, but I think that only people who gave a basic understanding of government and current events should be allowed to vote. We may be creeping toward that, as a growing percentage of voters now call themselves independents; and of truly independent, they probably vote for a reason, not blindly doing as told by either party. To vote for a reason they have to have become aware of something in politics that they like or dislike.


This was a case of voter fraud using absentee ballots so a) how would voter ID laws (which are used for in person voting at the polls) have helped prevent this; and, b) she was caught and convicted without a voter ID law so what's the problem? Not to mention that far more (tens, if not hundreds of thousands or even millions this time around) are being illegally thrown off the voting roles so why all the fuss over a few people voting multiple times (which i agree is not right) while masses of people are being thrown off of the roles illegally in an attempt to alter the outcome of an upcoming election?
 
 
+4 # cwilheim 2012-08-03 10:19
Most "independents" are actually one party or another; they just refuse to identify themselves because they don't want to get fundraising letters or phone calls. Everyone votes for a reason; some reasons are just better than othrs.

Voting for Repubicans because the "Republicans always win" in your state is the stupidest one I've ever heard. Do these voters actually think that Republicans will pay any attention to what they want them to do because they cast a secret ballot to get them elected? Are they really too stupid to understand that by voting for the Republicans, they have reaffirmed the Republicans in all the stupid ideas they have been fed by ALEC and the RNC? Don't they see that by reaffirming these ideas they have made it certain that the Republicans will continue to act upon them -- not upon reasonable ideas like working with the other side to find a route to good governance?

I have little patience with such people.
 
 
+3 # NCcoachie 2012-08-03 10:24
"I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of the people. They never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down."...this from the founder of the Heritage Foundation and GOP hero Paul Weyrich.
 
 
+6 # MJnevetS 2012-08-03 10:48
There was also a prominent Republican who WASN'T charged with voter fraud, although he cast a ballot in an election in a jurisdiction where he had no domicile...That would be Willard Mitt Romney. That's right, he voted for Scott Brown in Massachusetts AFTER he was no longer domiciled there. Where are the voting fraud charges? Where is the outrage? Oh, wait, he must have had a Massachusetts issued driver's license. Never mind, there's nothing to look at here. Move along please. (Of course the fact that he's rich and white would allow him to vote in any election in the country!)
 
 
+16 # Regina 2012-08-03 07:46
The Republican/"Tea " Party is the most subversive threat in our history. Why aren't people recognizing the stench of fascism in their connivances? The instances of actual voter fraud are minuscule and isolated individual occurrences. Our biggest threat by far comes from the fraudulent politics of the extremist "right" extremely rich and their stupid dupes a la Bachmann.
 
 
+2 # CL38 2012-08-03 10:30
great comment
 
 
+8 # mdhome 2012-08-03 08:06
Considering the timing of the laws removing voters from the lists and considering who are being removed, there is no doubt the republicans are doing this for the sole purpose of getting Mr, Flippin Flopper.
 
 
+9 # tswhiskers 2012-08-03 08:14
I went to a Dem fundraiser last night and in talking with a Dem running for the NC state Senate I learned that if the Rep candidate for governor is elected then NC will likely face the same voter ID problems that are occurring in other Rep. run states. I hope that you who are on this blog realize that your states may be a governorship or an election away from voting laws that will limit the franchise for minorities, the elderly, etc. I haven't read in these postings anything about political activism e.g. how people are planning to get people to the polls, or helping people to register properly. I hope all Progressives on this blog are and will continue to do as much as they can to get Dems to the polls and to forward the Dem agendas in your states. Yes, we all believe the Rep. party is run by crazies but are we doing our best to get and keep them out of power? These voter purges are truly undemocratic and scary things. This illustrates the long-term Republican agenda, namely to become and to REMAIN the party in power. This is not a Communist threat; it a fascist threat. I don't mean a Nazi threat. There are milder forms of Fascism, but they are ALL anti-democratic as well as undemocratic. We all need to notice the increasingly undemocratic changes taking place e.g. defunding of education, anti-abortion and anti-birth control, and many more. Think, all of you and then get active.
 
 
+10 # dkonstruction 2012-08-03 09:30
tswhiskers....r ight on...hard to believe someone gave you a thumbs down for your comment. they must support that kindler, gentler, "milder form of Fascism" that you so rightfully warn us about. As the father of an old professor of mine used to say (and he should know as he was the last general to defend Barcelona during the Spanish Civil War) "You don't fight fascists because you think you can win. You fight fascists because they are fascists."
 
 
+4 # Lolanne 2012-08-03 09:45
Quoting tswhiskers:
I. . . I haven't read in these postings anything about political activism e.g. how people are planning to get people to the polls, or helping people to register properly. I hope all Progressives on this blog are and will continue to do as much as they can to get Dems to the polls and to forward the Dem agendas in your states. Y. . .


tsw: You had 1 red thumb when I read your comment - ? I sure don't understand why. I canceled it with my positive.

I have advocated here a couple of times for exactly what you suggest: volunteering to help people get required forms of ID and be sure they are registered to vote. I didn't get much response.

I cannot understand why the Dems and all progressive organizations across the country are not addressing this loudly and often, organizing efforts for voter registration (no matter what ID requirements are in place), pushing constantly for volunteers to help with the efforts. After all, the statistical proof of what is happening is not news -- we've all known for a very long time what the repigs were up to.

And they may very well be successful if we don't all get off our behinds and DO something!
 
 
+1 # cwilheim 2012-08-03 10:20
Good one!
 
 
0 # Regina 2012-08-03 19:10
Romney also voted in Massachusetts when he was residing in Utah for the Olympics he directed. That was well before Scott Brown when he won Ted Kennedy's seat after his death.
 
 
+9 # Smiley 2012-08-03 08:42
This purging is voter fraud on a monstrous scale!
 
 
+3 # tedrey 2012-08-03 10:01
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution clearly states that every citizen has a right to vote, and states the sanctions to be applied against any state which seeks to interfere with this right. If anyone feels the danger from voting by non-citizens is more threatening, they should suggest a constitutional amendement, for the amazing fact is that nowhere in the constitution does it state that non-citizens cannot vote! An surprising oversight, if oversight it was.
 
 
+5 # angelfish 2012-08-03 11:03
FIGHT the RIGHT and their move to disenfranchise Americans! We MUST not let them get away with this BLATANT discrimination at the Polls! How frightened they must be to feel the need to "Rig" the Election in their favor! Let's give them CAUSE to be frightened! Vote them OUT in November! Never, EVER vote ReTHUGlican!
 
 
+1 # progressivetexan 2012-08-03 22:52
Seems like protecting the 2nd Amendment gets far more attention than the 14th Amendment. Since our country is an icon of democracy for the world, it should be the goal of ALL political parties to ensure that every individual who wants to vote is given ample opportunity to become EASILY registered. In this modern age of technology, we should develop acceptable methods for anyone to obtain a valid voter ID without difficulty. If a picture ID is required, let's offer numerous times and convenient places to obtain one (not just the overcrowded Dept of Motor Vehicles at limited hours). If we have senior citizens who've voted all their lives, but have no birth certificate or driver's license, let's not make it impossible for them to obtain the needed identification. If we can go to the moon, we can figure out how to legitimize a citizen who wants to vote. Purging their name from a registered voter list is NOT the answer, unless they've done something to lose the right to vote in a particular precinct. Before any name is purged, every effort should be made by election officials to correct unintended errors. Voting is a precious right that should be valued and protected by all officials desiring to preserve the freedoms we all share in the United States of America.
 
 
+2 # Clementine 2012-08-04 14:25
[quote name="progressi vetexan"]Seems like protecting the 2nd Amendment gets far more attention than the 14th Amendment. Since our country is an icon of democracy for the world, it should be the goal of ALL political parties to ensure that every individual who wants to vote is given ample opportunity to become EASILY registered. "

Oh for heaven's sake! The US is only an "icon of democracy" in the minds of its own deluded citizens. (The same ones who think it has the best health care in the world)
Most of the rest of us woke up to how unfair, undemocratic, and uncivilized it is years ago!
 
 
0 # panhead49 2012-08-04 06:33
Just asking - but how are race and marital status used in disenfranchisem ent? Neither were questions when I registered to vote.

Gonna take boots on the ground to get folks registered (absentee if possible) and to the polls - pitchin' a fit here won't get the job done.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN