RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "Big companies are spending a fortune on brand image and, now more than ever, if you organize or threaten a consumer boycott you can have a real impact."

Professor and author Michael Pollan. (photo: Rose Lincoln/Harvard)
Professor and author Michael Pollan. (photo: Rose Lincoln/Harvard)


Michael Pollan: Consumer Boycotts Are 'Achilles Heel of American Capitalism'

By Organic Consumers Association

26 January 18

 

rump has dumped family farmers.

That's right, President Trump, who once claimed he's "fighting for our farmers," is passing policies that mostly benefit the big agribusiness corporations—not small farmers, and certainly not rural communities.

Robert Reich, professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley, recently sat down with [see video above] Michael Pollan to discuss food and agriculture policy and inequality under the Trump administration. He also talked about how far food corporations will go to protect their brands' images.

Pollan, a food policy expert and author of several books including The Omnivore's Dilemma, didn't mince words when it comes to Trump's impact on food and ag policy, or where the president's loyalties lie. Pollan explained how Trump is rolling back anything initiated under the Obama administration, including Michelle Obama's standards for school lunch. So instead of nutritionists deciding what kids should eat, we're back to allowing the food companies to decide.

So basically, we're back to anything industry wants, Pollan said.

Pollan pointed out the irony in Trump's agricultural initiatives, noting that the rural vote helped get him elected, but now he's taking steps that will be a disaster for American farmers. He talked at length about NAFTA and how if Trump pulls out of this trade agreement it will greatly impact the industrial farming industry.

Pollan didn't discuss the impact NAFTA has on small, independent and/or organic farmers or workers, but dairy farmer Jim Goodman from Wonewoc, Wisconsin, sure did in this recent blog post. He sums it up this way:

"Anyone who supports the continuation of NAFTA without questioning who actually benefits really has no concern for the best interests of farmers or workers in the U.S., Canada or Mexico."

After talking a lot about what's gone wrong with our food system, Reich shifted the conversation in a more positive direction, asking Pollan what gives him hope. Pollan said he's "taking a lot of encouragement from some new developments in the labor movement around food." He spoke about the work of the Coalition of Immokalee Workers and their Fair Food Program that has helped Florida tomato growers obtain humane wages and safe working conditions.

In explaining how the program got started, Pollan said:

"They tried negotiating with the growers, they got nowhere. They marched across Florida, they got nowhere. They had a hunger strike, they got nowhere."

Finally, Lucas Benitez, a farmworker who helped start the Coalition of Immokalee Workers, said, as Pollan related:

"Then we found the door in the castle wall. That door was the brand of the big companies, the consumer-facing big companies, that bought the tomatoes from the growers, everybody from Whole Foods to McDonalds and Burger King, and they went after the brands with boycotts and threats of boycotts. What they did was they created a pledge, called the Fair Food Pledge and they basically said you will sign this or we will shame you. One by one all the big brands in food signed it. And it's working."

Reich and Pollan agreed that big companies are spending a fortune on brand image and, now more than ever, if you organize or threaten a consumer boycott you can have a real impact. Pollan said:

"It's the Achilles heel of American capitalism. They are not afraid of the government anymore, but they are afraid of their consumers attacking their brand."

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+8 # elizabethblock 2018-01-26 10:06
I'm old enough to remember the grape boycott! Yes!!!
 
 
0 # LionMousePudding 2018-01-26 18:53
It may have been my first boycott as well
 
 
+7 # PCPrincess 2018-01-26 11:39
Yes! I call this the 'Power of the Pocket'. It is quite literally the one power we have that can force change. The huge obstacle we have is getting consumers (our citizens) to realize their power and making the commitments to using that power. We simply need to stop buying from companies that are not playing fairly and/or are attempting to buy our legislators to do their bidding.

We tell them we are going to do it, make a very loud stink about it and then follow through. If done properly, it would work, every time.
 
 
+1 # Working Class 2018-01-26 12:08
Wonder how long before the GOP pushes advocating consumer boycotts an act of economic terrorism under the Homeland Securities Act? They will go to any length to protect their masters.
 
 
0 # economagic 2018-01-26 12:43
Yes, boycotts are probably THE most effective way to influence retailers. If the big companies realized how many of us have been boycotting how many of them for how long, we might be in better shape.

I've been boycotting virtually the entire US economy for more than 50 years, but I'm invisible. I just discovered that I may be able to go back to brewing my own beer using molasses from local farmers. Most if not all of the calls for boycotts that I see online apply to firms that I'm already boycotting--ser iously! I spent a good thirty years on strike against the machine, so buying next to nothing because I was earning next to nothing.

Perhaps we all need to buy everything we can afford from the worst firms we know for a couple of years, then STOP and tell them why.
 
 
+1 # Wise woman 2018-01-26 13:58
Getting groups of people to understand their power is the trick. Honestly, there are millions of "us" compared to thousands of "them." Perhaps these fly over folks have awakened and smelled the coffee and Bernie can convince them of how good it is.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN