RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Goldberg writes: "Instead of pressuring lawmakers to push new gun-control measures through the U.S. Congress, volunteers from groups including Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America are now running for office themselves."

Mourners hold signs during a solidarity vigil in memory of victims of Las Vegas' Route 91 Harvest music festival mass killing, in Newtown, Connecticut, the site of the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting, October 4, 2017. (photo: Michelle McLoughlin/Reuters)
Mourners hold signs during a solidarity vigil in memory of victims of Las Vegas' Route 91 Harvest music festival mass killing, in Newtown, Connecticut, the site of the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting, October 4, 2017. (photo: Michelle McLoughlin/Reuters)


Five Years After Sandy Hook, US Gun-Control Advocates Switch Strategy

By Barbara Goldberg, Reuters

12 December 17

 

ive years after a gunman killed 20 children and six adults at a Connecticut elementary school, advocates who are disappointed with the failure of efforts to limit access to firearms are changing their strategy.

Instead of pressuring lawmakers to push new gun-control measures through the U.S. Congress, volunteers from groups including Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America are now running for office themselves.

Nine of 13 volunteers trained by the group ran for office this year and won seats, ranging from New Hampshire state representative to city council member in West University Place, Texas. Fourteen more have already declared their intentions to run for office in 2018, seeking seats in Congress, state legislatures and local government, all running as Democrats.

“The reality is that the work doesn’t really start in Congress. That’s where it ends,” said Moms Demand Action founder Shannon Watts, who launched her group the day after the Dec. 14, 2012, massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

The group began training candidates after more than 400 of its 70,000 members said they were interested in running for office.

“This is a marathon, not a sprint,” Watts said. “It’s going to take several election cycles.”

Even if the next class of candidates, none of whom are running as Republicans, succeed in winning office, they will face an uphill battle against a U.S. Congress controlled by Republicans, who are staunch defenders of the right to bear arms protected by the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Sandy Hook was at the time the second-deadliest mass shooting carried out by a single gunman in U.S. history. It sparked new energy among gun-control advocates who pushed for fresh federal restrictions on assault weapons, which were blocked by Republican lawmakers and the powerful National Rifle Association lobby.

A steady stream of mass shootings have continued across the United States since Sandy Hook, including two deadlier incidents - the slaughter of 58 people at a Las Vegas concert in October and the massacre of 49 people at an Orlando gay nightclub last year.

GRASSROOTS EFFORT

Mark Barden, whose son Daniel was among the 20 first graders killed in Newtown, said he believes grass roots achievements like the new crop of gun-control candidates will lead to more action.

“This is a social change and it takes time,” Barden said. “What’s happening in Congress notwithstanding, the change is going to come from the ground up.”

In the meantime, Barden is working with Sandy Hook Promise, a volunteer effort to prevent more shooting deaths. The group said that in the past two years it has trained 2.5 million students and families to recognize signs of potential gun violence and report them to authorities.

Social change, whether it is about drunk driving or recycling, comes from the ground up, said Nicole Hockley, whose 6-year-old son Dylan died in the Sandy Hook attack.

“In the gun violence prevention movement, we have not focused on getting behavioral change. It’s all been focused on top-down and that is not how you get change,” she said.

Next year’s class of gun-control candidates includes a mother whose son was shot dead and a bystander paralyzed from the middle of her chest down in a drive-by shooting.

Lara Kennedy is running for U.S. House of Representatives in the Texas district that encompasses Austin and north of San Antonio.

Lucy McBath, whose only child Jordan Davis was shot dead after an argument over music while parked in Florida in 2012, is running for the Georgia House of Representatives.

In Arizona, Jennifer Longdon, who was wounded in a random 2004 shooting, also is seeking to become a state representative. In Arkansas, Adrienne Kvello is challenging incumbent Republican state Representative Charlie Collins, who sponsored bills to put more guns on college campuses, in courthouses and the state capitol.

Amber Gustafson, a gun-owning Moms Demand Action volunteer and life-long Republican who switched her party registration to Democrat last year, said if she wins her race for an Iowa state Senate seat, she will fight for gun safety laws aimed at preventing another Sandy Hook.

“I‘m pro people defending their Second Amendment rights. But I also believe and know that good laws can really protect lives,” Gustafson said.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+3 # ddd-rrr 2017-12-12 10:42
Bravo! THIS is the way to make-changes/ge t-things-done! It is more work and
it takes more time than a "top-down" approach, but it is FAR more likely to
achieve success, and the permanence of that success, than a "quick"
top-down approach. Our thanks are due to the people
who are willing to attempt this!
 
 
0 # bread and butter 2017-12-12 17:16
Why don't we NAME all mass murders of more than 4 people - like hurricanes, and now, winter storms?

We have NO control, as a nation, over the fact that every person is allowed to carry a personal military-style arsenal, so why not treat the inevitable results like the weather?

Let's start on the next one:

"MASS MURDER ALBERT"

Followed by:

"MASS MURDER BABS"

When we get through 26 of them in a year (or by the end of February), we just do whatever the National Weather Bureau does for hurricanes.

We're not allowed to fix this problem, so why not have a little fun?!?
 
 
+2 # Wise woman 2017-12-12 18:46
I've always felt that a "well armed militia" was exactly that. We already have that. It's called the National Guard. Anything else as far as I'm concerned is not covered by the Constitution.
 
 
-3 # Cowboy 45 2017-12-13 04:47
The 2nd amendment gives citizens the right to arm themselves to protect them from the government.
 
 
+1 # ddd-rrr 2017-12-13 11:15
I would think that any right-wing strict-construc tionist reader of the U.S. Constitution
would realize (and insist) that "arms" of a projectile-firi ng nature referred to by the
writers of that Constitution were single-shot muzzle-loading devices, and NOT
the advanced modern weapons they claim (incorrectly) were addressed
in the second amendment to the Constitution! But, apparently,
I would be wrong in making that logical assumption!
 
 
-2 # skylinefirepest 2017-12-13 23:12
Tell you what...I'll go back to a muzzle loader when you give up your cellphone and internet, how about that?? Put your money where your mouth is. Our forefathers were a hell of a lot smarter than anything we've had in office in the last forty or so years and they new there would be changes. Oh, and the National Guard Wise Woman is not now and has never been the "well armed militia" that you envisage!
 
 
-1 # ddd-rrr 2017-12-13 08:48
Bravo!! THIS is the way to make-changes/ge t-things-done! It is more work and
it takes more time than a "top-down" approach, but it is FAR more likely to
achieve success, and the permanence of that success, than a "quick"
top-down approach. Our thanks are due to the people
who are willing to attempt this!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN