RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Silverstein writes: "People with a history of mental illness, drug abuse and self-mutilation can now apply to serve in the U.S. Army, according to a report on Sunday, which emerged as a former Air Force recruit's mass shooting at a Texas church continues raising questions about the military's handling of mental health problems."

U.S. soldiers. (photo: Military Times)
U.S. soldiers. (photo: Military Times)


US Army Now Taking Applicants With Histories of Mental Illness, Drug Abuse, and Self-Mutilation

By Jason Silverstein, Newsweek

15 November 17

 

eople with a history of mental illness, drug abuse and self-mutilation can now apply to serve in the U.S. Army, according to a report on Sunday, which emerged as a former Air Force recruit’s mass shooting at a Texas church continues raising questions about the military’s handling of mental health problems.

The Army signed off on the change of policy in August but never announced it, USA Today reported. The decision comes while the Army struggles to meet its goal of recruiting 80,000 new soldiers by September 2018, as President Donald Trump ramps up the years-long battle against terror groups.

Under the new policy, applicants with mental health issues that previously would have barred them from service can ask for waivers allowing them to sign up. This ends an eight-year ban on the waivers that started after a spike in suicides among American fighters. It is unclear how many waivers will be available.

Army spokesman Lt. Col. Randy Taylor told USA Today there is now “increased availability of medical records,” which gave officials more confidence they can properly vet medical histories. Potential recruits will have to provide records along with a detailed statement and photos, and also undergo a psychiatric evaluation.

During America's 16-year War On Terror, the military has often struggled to handle mental health problems among fighters after rises in suicides and violence against innocent civilians. More than 200 active-duty servicemembers have died by suicide every year since 2008, according to Pentagon data. A study published this year by JAMA Psychiatry found that suicide attempts in the military are often infectious and help push even more recruits to try taking their own lives. 

The latest mental health controversy began last week after Devin Kelley, a dishonorably discharged former Air Force member, shot and killed 26 people during a church service in Sutherland Springs, Texas. Kelley died after the rampage from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, police said.

Kelley had been kicked out of the Air Force in 2012 for assaulting his wife and infant stepson, and he was also committed to a mental health facility in New Mexico, where he escaped after threatening to kill his superiors. The New York Times reported Saturday that Kelley struggled with depression and rage during his service. Counseling and reprimands only accentuated his outbursts and made fellow recruits fear he would erupt in violence. 

Kelley's conviction for assault should have prevented him from obtaining the military-style rifle he used for the church slaughter, which is the deadliest mass shooting in Texas history. But the Air Force said Kelley was mistakenly never entered into a federal criminal database, which would have stopped him from buying weapons. The Air Force is now investigating how the error happened and whether there were any other similar slipups.

This is the second consecutive year the Army has changed its recruiting standards to meet crushing demands for more troops. Last year, to hit a goal of 69,000 recruits, the Army began admitting applicants who scored poorly on an aptitude test, and it also increased waivers for marijuana use.

It is unclear whether Trump played a direct role in this year's decision. In a similar move earlier this year, he rolled back an Obama-era regulation making it harder for people with mental illnesses to buy guns. After the Texas shooting, Trump said he would not look into stronger gun control because the massacre was a "mental health problem."


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+10 # dotlady 2017-11-15 11:14
Sounds like extermination of those who are mentally disabled in the service of the war machine. Woe to civilians in the way or fellow servicemen. Even the mentally well-balanced fighters often become unbalanced when they experience the trauma of action.
Do other countries have this provision I wonder?
 
 
+12 # elizabethblock 2017-11-15 11:56
OMG.
Has it occurred to anyone in power that if we didn't start so many unnecessary, illegal wars we wouldn't need so many soldiers? Or that if the military didn't treat soldiers, not to mention veterans, so badly, it would not be the last choice for people in a position to choose?
 
 
+6 # economagic 2017-11-15 12:36
Listen to Arlo Guthrie's "Alice's Restaurant," c. 1967, and tell me this is news. The only thing new is that the Army is now admitting it openly and portraying it as beneficent. Arlo's song was at least partly fiction, but the only people not allowed to serve in the military are those who are NOT willing to kill people.
 
 
+6 # tedrey 2017-11-15 13:28
Looking at how the country treats its veterans, one wonders whether some degree of mental unawareness is shown by willingness to take the job.
 
 
+5 # angelfish 2017-11-15 14:20
We have met the enemy and..... he is US! How much MORE Lunacy is the American Populace to endure? Allowing Mentally Ill people and Domestic Abusers the right to buy Assault weapons isn't ENOUGH for these Maniacs? Mega-Wealthy or NOT, THIS idiocy is liable to rise up and bite them in a Vital spot! Please, Special Prosecutor Mueller! SAVE us from these Imbeciles! IMPEACH them ALL who would saddle America with Skin Heads, White Supremacists and other Knuckle-Dragger s of their Ilk, for KNOWINGLY allowing them into our Military! On the Rise since the Moron's Inauguration, hopefully, our Good God will look down on this Insanity and Help us to return Intelligence and Sanity to our Governance! Until then, Resist! Rebel! RePudiate!
 
 
+4 # Caliban 2017-11-15 18:53
This must be in the service of consistency.

Since we have have a "mentally disabled" person as Commander in Chief, why not give him more of his own kind to serve him?
 
 
+4 # Kootenay Coyote 2017-11-15 21:00
What!? No Cannibals? they’d at least make use of their military successes….
 
 
+3 # Wise woman 2017-11-15 22:56
Right, Caliban, that was my first thought as well. Like begets like. That and the fact that often these people are more malleable and probably make good killers as their thinking is skewed. What a sad, sorry state this country is in. For shame on anyone who approves this business.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN