RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "Donald Trump's administration says the government ethics office lacks the authority to force the president to reveal how many waivers he's granted to ex-lobbyists in his new administration."

Trump's budget director is asking that the Office of Government Ethics halt an inquiry into lobbyists-turned-Trump administration employees. (photo: Saul Loeb/Getty Images/AFP Creative)
Trump's budget director is asking that the Office of Government Ethics halt an inquiry into lobbyists-turned-Trump administration employees. (photo: Saul Loeb/Getty Images/AFP Creative)


Ethics Office Rejects White House Attempt to Halt Inquiry Into Lobbyists

By Associated Press

23 May 17

 

Office rejects Trump budget director’s claim it lacks authority to demand information on former lobbyists granted waivers to work in administration

onald Trump’s administration says the government ethics office lacks the authority to force the president to reveal how many waivers he’s granted to ex-lobbyists in his new administration.

Trump’s budget director, Mick Mulvaney, is asking that the office of government ethics (OGE) director, Walter Shaub, halt his inquiry into lobbyists-turned-Trump administration employees. Mulvaney wrote in a letter last week to Shaub: “This data call appears to raise legal questions regarding the scope of OGE’s authorities.”

Shaub fired back Monday that OGE’s request was well within bounds. The ethics director says he expects to see the waiver information within 10 days.

The back-and-forth follows a request Shaub made in April that agency heads share with his office waivers that the Trump administration has issued to its ethics policies concerning lobbyists.

In 2009, the Republican senator Chuck Grassley asked the government ethics office to use its authority to force Barack Obama to reveal how many waivers he had granted to ex-lobbyists in his new administration.

Eight years and a political flip later, Republicans in Donald Trump’s administration say OGE lacks that authority, and they have asserted that there is no need for them to publicly disclose any ethics waivers.

Shaub highlighted Grassley’s request years ago as evidence that lawmakers agree that OGE’s request is well within bounds, even though Republicans so far have been silent on the Trump administration’s resistance to disclosure.

“I want to assure you that a request from the director of the Office of Management and Budget is not something that I decline lightly,” Shaub wrote to Mulvaney.

As part of Trump’s promise to “drain the swamp” of Washington, he continued an Obama-era two-year prohibition of lobbyists and lawyers hired into the executive branch from working on “particular” government matters that involved their former clients.

Trump also instituted a five-year lobbying freeze and lifetime ban on foreign government lobbying for people who later leave his administration.

Like Obama, Trump is making exceptions to those rules. In his two terms as president, Obama granted waivers to 66 White House and administration employees, according to what the OGE posted on its website.

“In the Obama administration, the president ordered that waivers be shared with OGE, and we gladly did so,” Obama’s chief ethics counsel, Norman Eisen, said Monday.

Waivers continue under the Trump administration, but the extent of them is unknown because his executive actions on ethics do not include provisions for public disclosure or information-sharing with OGE.

While each administration has the authority to grant waivers, there should be some central repository for the public to learn when an employee has been granted one, said Sean Moulton, the open government program manager at the Project on Government Oversight in Washington.

Mulvaney’s letter last week indicated that administration agencies, such as treasury, commerce and defense, would not respond to Shaub. Separately, there is a longstanding legal question about whether the White House itself is subject to any disclosure to the OGE. The Office of the White House Counsel has until 1 June to comply with Shaub’s data request or decline in writing.

Eisen called the move by Mulvaney “the latest salvo in his attack on good government”.

Democratic lawmakers also seized on the White House’s desire to keep ethics waivers private – in a way that seemed to channel Grassley circa 2009. They asked the OGE to keep up the fight.

“It is critical that you and your office make transparent how the individuals serving in the Trump Administration are complying, or failing to comply, with President Trump’s executive order and other ethics requirements,” Elijah Cummings and other Democrats on the House Oversight Committee wrote in a letter dated 19 May. “Your role is particularly important because the White House itself is keeping this information secret.”

The House oversight chairman, Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican who says he is soon leaving office, did not respond to requests for comment.

Eight years ago, Grassley asked the OGE to force “the Obama administration to live up to its word”.

“As a senior member of the United States Senate, I have consistently worked to ensure that the business of the Government is done in as open and transparent manner as possible,” Grassley wrote in his 10 June 2009 letter to OGE’s then director, Robert Cusick.

Shaub wrote in his letter Monday to Mulvaney that it was Grassley’s letter that prompted his office to develop a policy of posting ethics waivers for the Obama administration.

“However, the current Administration has not been complying with this established practice,” Shaub wrote.

Grassley’s office did not return repeated requests for comment.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN