RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Silva writes: "A former law student of President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee alleges that Neil Gorsuch told a class that 'many' women manipulate their employers for maternity benefits and that law firms should ask female interviewees about their pregnancy plans in order to protect their companies."

Supreme Court Justice nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch is pictured on Capitol Hill on Feb. 14, 2017. (photo: Andrew Harnik/AP)
Supreme Court Justice nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch is pictured on Capitol Hill on Feb. 14, 2017. (photo: Andrew Harnik/AP)


Student: Gorsuch Told Class 'Many' Women Manipulate Maternity Leave

By Daniella Silva, NBC News

20 March 17

 

former law student of President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee alleges that Neil Gorsuch told a class that "many" women manipulate their employers for maternity benefits and that law firms should ask female interviewees about their pregnancy plans in order to protect their companies.

Jennifer Sisk, a 2016 graduate of the University of Colorado Law School, wrote in a two-page letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee published on Sunday that on April 19 of last year, Gorsuch presented his legal ethics class with a hypothetical of law students interviewing for jobs at firms.

Gorsuch at one point asked the class whether they knew of any women who had "used a company to get maternity benefits and then left right after having a baby," according to Sisk's letter.

After only a handful of students raised their hands, Sisk wrote, the federal judge became more animated and said, "C'mon guys."

Gorsuch proceeded to say that all of his students' hands should have been raised because "many" women used their employers for maternity benefits and then left after giving birth, Sisk said in her letter.

Gorsuch also outlined how law firms and companies "had to ask female interviewees about pregnancy plans in order to protect the company," she said.

While guidelines from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission do not prohibit employers from asking applicants about gender-related characteristics such as pregnancy, these types of questions are discouraged, according to the commission's website. Additionally, an employer cannot discriminate against job applicants or employees based on pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions as a motivating factor under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.

Sisk's letter was sent on Friday and was addressed to committee Chairman Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and to Ranking Member Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.

Sisk said in her letter that she shared her experience because Gorsuch's "values shared during that class were concerning and should be explored further during his confirmation hearings for the United States Supreme Court."

Sisk added that she raised her concerns about Gorsuch's comments with school administration and voiced her frustrations on a Facebook group for female lawyers.

But in a letter provided to NBC News on Monday by a person helping with the Gorsuch nomination process, another former student wrote to the committee to refute Sisk's claims.

"Although Judge Gorsuch did discuss some of the topics mentioned in the letter, he did not do so in the manner described," Will Hauptman wrote in the letter, which was sent on Sunday.

Hauptman wrote that Gorsuch often asked his students to consider the challenges they would face as new attorneys, including the tension between building a career and starting a family, especially for women.

"The seriousness with which the judge asked us to consider these realities reflected his desire to make us aware of them, not any animus against a career or group," he wrote.

A response from the person aiding in the Gorsuch nomination process also said that Sisk's claims were false and came from a misunderstanding of the hypothetical discussion question.

Gorsuch, a federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, was appointed by Trump to fill the seat left by the late Justice Antonin Scalia. His three-day confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee began Monday.

Sisk's letter was published on Sunday by the National Women's Law Center (NWLC) and the National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA).

The NELA published additional documents they said support Sisk's claim, including a Facebook post from the day after the alleged incident, an email exchange between Sisk and school staff and an affidavit from an anonymous former student of Gorsuch providing similar details of the incident.

Gorsuch presented the discussion "as the way he personally felt about those subjects," the anonymous student said in the affidavit, which was drafted by a member of NELA's Judicial Nominations Committee.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+7 # Cassandra2012 2017-03-21 00:46
What a sick misogynistic lowlife! Unfit for the Supreme Court!!
 
 
+13 # bardphile 2017-03-21 01:56
This article is actually an argument against the system of employer-based health insurance. Many people seek or stay in jobs based on health insurance. Of course they do. All employers and most employees would be better off with a Medicare-for-al l system.
 
 
+1 # Femihumanist 2017-03-21 15:55
You said what I had planned on saying when I read the article.

But, it's also not just health-care; it's maternity/pater nity leave. It shouldn't be up the employer to pay; it should be a government fund like unemployment compensation.

The only requirements on employers should be work related: Minimum wage; maximum hours; overtime pay; sick leave and vacation time requirements. All other paid benefits should not be required of employers, but taxed, if provided.
 
 
+2 # economagic 2017-03-21 19:13
You mean, as in every civilized country?
 
 
+8 # madame de farge 2017-03-21 09:35
This is the Strict Father meme of the Rethuglicans... Women should submit to men and corporations so that they can make more profits and more money than the little woman...
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN