Keyes reports: "Mitt Romney's campaign has been training poll watchers in Wisconsin with highly misleading...information about voters' rights."
Assistant City Clerk Donna Deuster swears in poll workers in Racine, Wisconsin, 10/29/12. (photo: Stephanie Jones/Journal Times)
Romney Campaign Training Poll Watchers To Mislead Voters In Wisconsin
31 October 12
itt Romney's campaign has been training poll watchers in Wisconsin with highly misleading - and sometimes downright false - information about voters' rights.
Documents from a recent Romney poll watcher training obtained by ThinkProgress contain several misleading or untrue claims about the rights of Wisconsin voters. A source passed along the following packet of documents, which was distributed to volunteers at a Romney campaign training in Racine on October 25th. In total, eight such trainings were held across the state in the past two weeks and 17 since late September.
One blatant falsehood occurs on page 5 of the training packet, which informed poll watchers that any "person [who] has been convicted of treason, a felony, or bribery" isn't eligible to vote. This is not true. Once a Wisconsin voter who has been convicted of a felony completes his or her sentence, that person is once again eligible to vote.
The training also encouraged volunteers to deceive election workers and the public about who they were associated with. On page 3 of the packet, Romney poll workers were instructed to hide their affiliation with the campaign and told to sign in at the polls as a "concerned citizen" instead. As Kristina Sesek, Romney's legal counsel who just graduated from Marquette Law School last year, explained, "We're going to have you sign in this election cycle as a ‘concerned citizen.' We're just trying to alleviate some of the animosity of being a Republican observer up front."
This packet could cause major problems if Republican observers across the state try to enforce such wrong and misleading information on Election Day. Even if they simply slow the voting process down, this could discourage voters waiting in line and drive drown turnout.
Here are four misleading or incorrect pieces of information distributed by the Romney campaign:
CLAIM: Any "person [who] has been convicted of treason, a felony, or bribery" isn't eligible to vote. (Page 5)
FACT: Once a person who has been convicted of a felony completes his or her sentence, including probation and fines, that person is eligible to vote.
CLAIM: Page 8 lists 10 items as "The ONLY Acceptable Forms of "Proof of Residency".
FACT: The list used is incomplete. There are many other documents people can use to prove residency that are not included, such as letters from public schools, student loan papers, correspondence with a Native American tribe in Wisconsin, vehicle registration, and food stamp correspondances. In addition, the list fails to mention that homeless voters may use an affidavit from a public or private social service agency as proof of residency.
CLAIM: "If a handicapped voter is unable to come into the polls to vote, an assistant can deliver the ballot to the voter if the CEI verifies the elector's proof of residency." (Page 10)
FACT: Under Wisconsin law, the CEI (Chief Election Inspector) does not have to verify proof of residency so long as the voter is registered.
CLAIM: "Election Observers should not assist [voters]." (Page 10)
FACT: A voter can ask for assistance from anyone, including a poll watcher, so long as the voter initiates the request and does not engage in electioneering.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
ACORN NEVER did anything illegal, and if you registered with them as a Republican your registration was turned in, not destroyed as happens so often with Republican groups. You can not show any legitimate claim about ACORN doing anything wrong.
DEMOCRACY SCARES REPUGS.
Question anyone who questions you. Ask THEM for their ID, and write down the name. Loudly but cheerfully, and make sure everyone around them knows what they're up to. They have absolutely NO legal or official standing.
Know the laws, and get help if you need it, from a real poll worker.
What they want is intimidation that renders everyone silent and docile. Laughter is a better response to these creeps.
Verified Voting https://www.verifiedvoting.org/resources/voting-equipment/ one of the leading US organizations concerning US right-to-vote & verifiable voting systems concludes that Far too many states use unreliable and insecure electronic voting machines, and many states have made their situation worse by adding some forms of Internet voting for some voters, which cannot be checked for accuracy at all. Even in states where verifiable systems are used, too often the check on the voting system’s function and accuracy is not done. In 2012, the voting systems now in use are aging; resources are severely impacted by the state of the economy over the past several years; shortages of both equipment and human resources are likely. After all the effort necessary to overcome the other hurdles to casting a ballot, it is patently unfair that once you get to the ballot box, that the ballot itself fails you. These problems threaten to silently disenfranchise voters, potentially in sufficient numbers to alter outcomes. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/relational-economy/8-economic-democracy
"I said that Romney wants to win without honor. And then, I can tell you that for someone to lie their way into the presidency, to not have the spine and the backbone to stand up to other lies that are told by their surrogates, is very, very disconcerting. The president of the United States has to be a person who his word—or her word, some day—will be his bond or her bond. And the reality of that is that nobody in the world knows who Mitt Romney is. He’s whatever he has to be to try and close the deal. And I want to believe that the American people are smarter than that."
Romney's campaign materials were inaccurate but so was this article since it omitted the very important criterion of completing parole before having voting rights restored. Was this an oversight or intentional? Given that many ineligible felons are on parole and could fairly easily register to vote, this omission makes the article suspect.
But I'd rather we gave both sides the benefit of a doubt since state voting rules are filled with minutiae and few people are able to navigate them without running afoul.
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
Persons/organizations unable to navigate the rules without running afoul should not set themselves up in the expert role of poll watcher.
In case you are unaware of what constitutes a sentence, completing the sentence includes all that, so the article was right and you aren't. However I think it was out of not understanding, not hostility, so I'll give you a thumbs up.
I hope someone approaches me as I will have them arrested. If I find the same people in township, behind people while voting I am going to take pictures of them.
I am tired of the bullshit, so should every American. We Can Change Things...first we have to find what hole we put our heads in.
Every State has different laws about felons. Guess the Rethugs are closer to them than God.
RSS feed for comments to this post