RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Malewitz reports: "The sponsor of Pennsylvania's voter identification law says only 'lazy' people would be disenfranchised this November by requirements to show photo identification at the polls."

Rep. Daryl D. Metcalfe thinks people shouldn't be allowed to vote if they are too lazy to get a valid ID. (photo: AP)
Rep. Daryl D. Metcalfe thinks people shouldn't be allowed to vote if they are too lazy to get a valid ID. (photo: AP)


Pennsylvania Voter ID Author: Lazy 47% Shouldn't Vote

By Jim Malewitz, Stateline

20 September 12

 

he sponsor of Pennsylvania's voter identification law says only "lazy" people would be disenfranchised this November by requirements to show photo identification at the polls.

Speaking to Pittsburgh radio station KDKA Wednesday (September 19), Daryl Metcalfe, a House Republican, said no "legitimate voter that actually wants to exercise that right and takes on the according responsibility," would be disenfranchised by the law. But critics argue the law would suppress turnout among thousands of poor, elderly and minority voters - a population less likely to own a photo ID and more likely to vote Democratic.

"As Mitt Romney said, 47 percent of the people that are living off the public dole, living off their neighbors' hard work, and we have a lot of people out there that are too lazy to get up and get out there and get the ID they need. If individuals are too lazy, the state can't fix that," Metcalfe told a radio host, referring to the GOP presidential candidate's secretly recorded remarks, which have caused his campaign to backtrack this week.

Pennsylvania Democrats are circulating Metcalf's interview, trying to make the case that Republican backers of the law, which remains tied up in court, lack sympathy for those who don't have easy access to required IDs.

On Tuesday, the state Supreme Court sent the case back to the Commonwealth Court, where a judge last month signed off on the law, saying he was "not convinced that any of the individual Petitioners or other witnesses will not have their votes counted in the general election."

The Supreme Court instructed the lower court to more fully consider whether the law is ready for its test in November.

"Upon review, we find that the disconnect between what the Law prescribes and how it is being implemented has created a number of conceptual difficulties in addressing the legal issues raised," the majority wrote. "We are not satisfied with a mere predictive judgment based primarily on the assurances of government officials, even though we have no doubt they are proceeding in good faith."

As Stateline has reported, election officials in Pennsylvania and in other states with new voter ID requirements have faced major hurdles as they prepare for November.

Those who have testified about the law's potential impact on Pennsylvania voters include 93-year old Bea Booker, who lives in a senior center and was too frail to testify in person, and Tyler Florio, a 21-year-old high school student diagnosed with autism, chronic fatigue syndrome and mitochondrial dysfunction.

Challengers of the law argue those examples show that many Pennsylvanians would struggle to gather the documents required - including a birth certificate - to obtain a valid photo ID, and they would be unable to endure the extra trip to a state licensing center.

The law's proponents say such would-be voters should qualify to cast absentee ballots.

See also: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Puts Voter ID Law In Jeopardy


 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+48 # dkonstruction 2012-09-20 11:57
If he will also agree that the 1/3 of the country that doesn't believe in evolution, still think Obama is a Muslim or didn't/wouldn't put his hand on the bible when he took the oath of office, think climate change is a hoax, or that Romney was more responsible for getting Bin Laden than Obama are too stupid to vote then maybe we will consider his idea about "the lazy"...until that time i would much rather have "the lazy" than the stupid voting.
 
 
+31 # TrueAmericanPatriot 2012-09-20 12:48
Metcalfe, WHY DON'T YOU STOP MOOCHING on government payroll + benefits and go out and get a REAL JOB YOURSELF? LAZY? You represent the EPITOME of laziness! You RETHUG-TEABAGGE RS KNEW EXACTLY what you were doing. My hope is that a class-action suit is brought against the PA Legislature and all who wrote and voted for this measure are charged with a FELONY against the U.S. Government. If so, YOU and your CRONIES will be in PRISON FOR A LONG TIME!!! If "Myth Robme" keeps putting his foot in his mouth, WE WON'T NEED PA!!!! I bless the day the justice is truly served and ALL OF YOU EVIL SCUM ARE JAILED!!!
OBAMA-BIDEN 2012!!!!! TO GUANTANAMO BAY WITH METCALFE AND HIS VERMIN COLLEAGUES!!!!
 
 
+9 # Barbara K 2012-09-21 07:52
Well said. Here is something more that should just "frost" us. It is how ROMNEY built MONSANTO, on AlterNet now:

http://www.alternet.org/food/how-mitt-romney-and-bain-helped-grow-monsanto-biotech-giant

VOTE STRAIGHT DEMOCRATIC
The alternative is unbearable
 
 
+37 # michelle 2012-09-20 12:50
Is there any doubt about the republican agenda now? If the people do not fight back quickly, all is lost. My biggest fear is that republicans will manage to steal this election and then pass legislation to make the theft legal. We know what they think of half of America. We know what they plan.
 
 
+25 # janie1893 2012-09-20 22:38
Is no one but me afraid of the consequences if this uncontrolable mouth says something stupid and insultig to countries in the mid east? We all need to be aware of the international chaos he could create when his mouth goes wild.
 
 
-14 # RLF 2012-09-21 03:52
We are supposed to have freedom of speech, not have to think about the feelings of every over sensitive religious nut on the planet. Haven't seen anyone in Muslim countries protesting the nasty cartoons constantly in their papers about Jews. Being in government is different though...being sensitive is your JOB. American morons will get exactly what they vote for...another stooge for Wall St. which ever party they vote foor.
 
 
+3 # Atia 2012-09-21 07:33
Some Muslims should practice what they preach...if it's not OK for anyone in the West to insult their religion, but it's OK for them to insult other religions, including different sects of their own religion, then their outrage is merely grasping ANY excuse to use violence.
 
 
-2 # Atia 2012-09-21 07:34
Is there ANY religion on earth, that we know of, where masses riot in the street, yelling "God is great!" - I can't think of any.....
 
 
0 # freeportguy 2012-09-21 19:07
You have the right to state your opinion. I have the right to criticize it.
 
 
-16 # MidwestTom 2012-09-21 04:41
Since most of government activity involves taxing and the spending of taxes received, maybe only people filing tax returns should be allowed to vote. They are at least active in the community, and have some idea of what is going on; and it would make voter ID simple: the IRS knows everybody who files; especially since they just added 15,000 additional agents under OBama.
 
 
+17 # pbbrodie 2012-09-21 06:28
Tom, unfortunately, federal income tax isn't the only tax people pay, which ruins your "solution." Many people who do not make enough money to pay federal income taxes, still pay payroll taxes, Social Security and Medicare, along with property taxes, sales taxes, etc. Don't fall for the Republican right wing, BS that 40% of the people do not pay taxes. What they mean is that 40% don't pay federal income taxes and I'm not sure that the number is that high. If it is that high, that is just more proof that the minimum wage is way, way too low and that there are an awful lot of people who are working that still don't make enough to be above the poverty line. These people should and do have every right to vote and without any hindrances!
 
 
+13 # AndreM5 2012-09-21 07:05
Geez. Hate the Constitution much?

This is exactly the govt model held by tyrants over serfs for centuries. "Only landowners have a vote and can serve in govt." Get real.
 
 
+4 # dkonstruction 2012-09-21 12:53
Quoting MidwestTom:
Since most of government activity involves taxing and the spending of taxes received, maybe only people filing tax returns should be allowed to vote. They are at least active in the community, and have some idea of what is going on; and it would make voter ID simple: the IRS knows everybody who files; especially since they just added 15,000 additional agents under OBama.


Right, so you now want to prevent all poor people including seniors on a fixed income, students who are now 18 but who may still be full-time students and thus have no income, and all of us that "merely" pay payroll taxes.

How about if we include all of those earning over $110,000 a year since they don't pay social security taxes on any income over that?

Why don't you just call for a fascist military coup and be done with elections altogether?
 
 
+3 # Billsy 2012-09-21 13:01
We already have far too few people voting in elections, meaning the candidates have fewer and fewer citizens and issues to address. For example, a county with prisons is allowed to use the prison population to qualify an additional representative, yet, the prisoners have no right to vote. Write off that constituency. Then the poor tend not to vote, so write off another constituency. On the contrary Midwest... we would be better off if, like the australians, we reqjuired EVERY citizen to vote should they wish to avail themselves of any federal benefit. For example, you want a passport? Then you better have cast a vote in the latest election. Don't like the choices? You can vote for none of the above, but EACH citizen must vote. Then and only then can you truly claim an elected representative has a mandate. Sorry bud, but as soon as you begin to disqualify voters with whom you simply disagree, you've corrupted the republic and rendered it meaningless.
 
 
+15 # genierae 2012-09-21 04:49
The worst of the worst have taken over the Republican party, and there are no longer any sane people in leadership positions. Therefore we are confronted by lunatic behavior and speech such as Mr. Metcalfe's. I think these right-wing fanatics are helping Obama more than Romney, and so let them rant on, they are the best examples of why any sane person should vote for our president.
 
 
+3 # JSRaleigh 2012-09-21 05:11
Asshole!
 
 
+2 # jasue911@embarqmail.com 2012-09-21 17:28
Midwest Tom... maybe we should just use a simple IQ test. That might not be a good thing for those of you who can't think for themselves.
 
 
0 # charsjcca 2012-09-27 19:16
What is worth remembering is that you can register every election period. No one can keep you from voting, that is signing the book and accepting a ballot.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN