RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Israel writes: "Wednesday, the Scott administration reached a partial settlement with civil rights groups who had objected to the first purge."

Gov. Rick Scott could be using the voter roll purge controversy as a way to pave the road to re-election. (photo: AP)
Gov. Rick Scott could be using the voter roll purge controversy as a way to pave the road to re-election. (photo: AP)


Florida Supervisors of Elections Speak Out Against New Voter Purge

By Josh Israel, ThinkProgress

13 September 12

 

s Gov. Rick Scott (R-FL) and his Secretary of State continue their Ahab-like attempts to revive their failed voter purge, a bipartisan chorus of local elections supervisors are expressing frustration and concern about the cost and timing of the effort.

Wednesday, the Scott administration reached a partial settlement with civil rights groups who had objected to the first purge. The state agreed to restore to the rolls any voter it identified as "potential non-citizen" unless the elections officials can confirm their non-citizenship with a U.S. Department of Homeland Security Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database. It also said it would mail all registered voters who received purge letters earlier this year a note "informing them that they are indeed registered to vote," unless they have been confirmed to be non-citizens. Some publications inaccurately reported that this meant the voter purge has been stopped; it has not.

Last Thursday, the state's 67 county elections supervisors were instructed to participate in a September 10 webinar on how the Scott administration expected counties to proceed as it restarts its purge. The supervisors were given a 52-slide PowerPoint presentation but little opportunity to ask questions or discuss the plans. While the state will be paying to check the initial round of names against the SAVE database, elections supervisors were told that they would have to enter into a "memorandum of agreement" in which they agree to pay up to $1.50 per search in the future out of county funds. In the upcoming weeks, the names of voters from the initial lists who the state still believes are non-citizens will be sent to local supervisors to restart the purge efforts where they left off. The Scott administration acknowledges that the supervisors may not be able to complete the purge before the November elections. And from their initial list of 2,600 "sure-fire" non-citizens, the administration has only found 207 it says it is certain are ineligible voters. In fact, they were only able to even check 1,700 of the names with the new SAVE database.

Volusia County Elections Supervisor Ann McFall (R) told ThinkProgress that the cost of this effort - plus the cost of more certified mailings and staff time - is a concern. "Our budgets have already gone in for the year... I didn't budget [up to $1.50] per person." The certified letter "at $5.65 and the four people's salary and wages I have to put on this," she notes mean she'll have to "take them away from something else."

Palm Beach County Elections Supervisor Susan Bucher (D) echoed these concerns in a ThinkProgress interview:

I don't know that I can do that right now - we've already submitted our budget agreement. I'd have to run the Memorandum of Agreement by our local attorney and our county attorney... We want to make sure we only have eligible voters on our voter file... but we're kind of busy doing a general election. We have 39 employees and a very streamlined budget. Can I enter into this Memorandum of Agreement to pay this? I will have to discuss with county, who funds my budget.

Mary Cooney, spokeswoman for Broward County Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes (D), said she is less concerned about the SAVE costs than about using limited staff resources on a complicated purge less than 60 days before a major presidential election. "The time commitment to get this done is more problematic than the dollars," she observed.

A spokesman for the Florida Department of State did not respond to a request for comment.


 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+20 # WolfTotem 2012-09-14 01:58
Can't citizens "un-citizened" by this wonderful attempt at ballot-rigging sue for defamation or some form of malicious slander if, like the 91-year-old WW2 veteran, officials should have known their imputation was false?
 
 
+5 # JSRaleigh 2012-09-14 09:36
Quoting WolfTotem:
Can't citizens "un-citizened" by this wonderful attempt at ballot-rigging sue for defamation or some form of malicious slander if, like the 91-year-old WW2 veteran, officials should have known their imputation was false?


Sure they can ... if they can afford to pay the up-front legal costs out of pocket with no assurance of ever recovering those costs.
 
 
+20 # overanddone 2012-09-14 02:23
If you don't know Rick Scott you should he's been picking your pocket for years.

ttp://www.mothe rjones.com/mojo /2010/11/rick-s cott-alex-sink- florida
 
 
+17 # WolfTotem 2012-09-14 02:28
Maybe there'll be lawyers interested in the malicious defamation issue...

More broadly, after promoting the (praiseworthy) sending of international observers to elections all over the world, isn't it more than time to invite them to observe and report on elections in the USA?
 
 
+11 # Regina 2012-09-14 08:00
The voter purge is a Nazi putsch. Those who forget history may be destined to relive it.
 
 
+8 # TrueAmericanPatriot 2012-09-14 09:47
"We The People," should file class action lawsuits against every one of these vile vermin! I am going to attempt to find a number of registered voters who are willing to "tough it out;" all of the way through the court system!! All participants of the "suppression effort should handled as follows:

1) Fire them! 2) Arrest them! 3)Book 'em! 4) Jail 'em! 5) Try them! (in a legitimate court of law) 5) IMPRISON THEM FOR AT LEAST TWO DECADES!! I'm ready to get this show on the road; but before that, "OBAMA-BIDEN 2012!!!! 4 MORE YEARS!"
 
 
+4 # chrisconnolly 2012-09-14 13:09
Carter was invited to observe our elections but he had to decline sighting too many inconsistencies in our elections policies that vary from state to state and often from county to county. It sure seems we should have a national elections standard. But the states always cry foul citing states rights.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN