RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

O'Brien reports: "Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker raised an unprecedented $37 million since taking office in 2011, most of it spent to stave off a bid to recall him after he enacted curbs on public sector unions last year, according to a filing on Thursday."

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker addresses campaign event in Wisconsin, July 5th, 2012. (photo: Larry Downing/Reuters)
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker addresses campaign event in Wisconsin, July 5th, 2012. (photo: Larry Downing/Reuters)



Scott Walker Fended Off Recall With Unprecedented Funds

By Brendan O'Brien, Reuters

07 July 12

 

isconsin Governor Scott Walker raised an unprecedented $37 million since taking office in 2011, most of it spent to stave off a bid to recall him after he enacted curbs on public sector unions last year, according to a filing on Thursday.

The 44-year-old, first-term governor, who has become a rising national star of the Republican party, spent more than $35 million to defeat Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett in the June 5 recall election, according to Walker's campaign finance report filed with the state elections board.

Barrett, a Democrat, was also due to release his campaign finances.

"Overwhelming support from the grassroots was the engine behind Governor Walker's historic victory in June, and that strong support continues in an incredible way," Walker campaign spokesman Tom Evenson said.

Walker trounced Barrett by 8 percentage points, a larger margin of victory than when the two faced off in an election two years ago, and he became the first governor in U.S. history to survive a recall.

The recall victory raised warning flags for President Barack Obama and his fellow Democrats in the first big political test of the 2012 campaign, ahead of the November 6 presidential and congressional elections.

According to the filing, Walker took in $27.7 million since the beginning of the year, during which he went on a nationwide tour giving speeches and raising money to fend off the recall.

He has about $1.6 million in cash in his campaign fund.

Contributions to the Walker campaign far exceeded amounts previously raised by Wisconsin gubernatorial candidates and matched the amount spent by all candidates and interest groups in the 2010 gubernatorial race, the most expensive election in state history.

"Governor Walker matched that himself in this election. It's just insane," said Mike McCabe, executive director of Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, a nonpartisan watchdog group that monitors campaign financing.

Weeks after taking office in January of 2011, Walker angered Democrats and labor groups with his successful drive to limit public workers' rights to collective bargaining. A statewide recall petition drive triggered special elections for Walker, Lieutenant Governor Rebecca Kleefisch and three Republican senators who were eligible to face recall under state law.

The Republicans were largely triumphant in the recall elections, with only Senator Van Wanggaard, who represents Racine County, losing. In defeating Wanggaard, Democrats earned a 17-16 majority in the Senate until the November election, when half of the members are up for re-election.

(Editing By Andrew Stern and Paul Simao)

 

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-11 # MidwestTom 2012-07-07 07:09
Unfortunately, as wages continue to drop in the private sector the public sector frequently acts as if it is above the crushing economic crisis that our country is experiencing. Money poured in Wisconsin from out of state because other states know that they face the same problems. States could take the Illinois approach, of simply not paying their bills, and dropping patients from medicaid, and eliminating drug coverage for seniors, with more cuts needed to even come close to balancing the budget. What do you prefer; higher taxes, cuts in pay, or dropping of benefits?. Those who vote for a living probably want higher taxes, while those who work for a living would probably want cuts in pay.
 
 
+8 # grouchy 2012-07-07 10:37
Looks like the fat cat 1% really don't want to let him get un-elected and prove to the nation that these kind of jerks can be beat. This is to be expected, right?
 
 
+7 # mdhome 2012-07-07 11:21
Governor Koch bros Walker bought his election, showing us that elections are won with money, plain and simple. The billionaires own the elections now, please stop the sale of our country.
 
 
+5 # michelle 2012-07-07 12:22
"Scott Walker Fended Off Recall With Unprecedented Funds" and...with the support of very stupid voters.

Turn off the TV and start paying attention people. When you rely on sound bites for your information, you surrender your vote to the corporate powers of Citizens United.
 
 
-4 # Raymond Dean 2012-07-07 16:07
Isn't it about time you apologists for the wrong minded attempt to recall Scott Walker stop the nonsense that it was money that made the difference. Just look at the desire nationwide for right-to-work legislation and rules and absence of coercion to pay union dues and "taxes" for medical care or any other nanny administered program from Washington.

The democrats are using the same worn argument against Mitt Romney. What about the millions from Hollywood for the Democrats over the years and now?

Money is not the problem, it is the lack of broad appeal of the desire to require people to be told by government to accept what is decided by bureaucrats not with respect to appropriate functions of the federal governmen t- tariffs, national defense, etc.
 
 
+2 # speedboy 2012-07-08 02:09
The real tradgedy in this fiasco is that it has proven that enuff money can buy any election. Now the fat-cats will only have to fine-tune their donations to assure that they don't overspend like they did in Wisky---winning by 8%, a much larger margin than was needed!
 
 
+2 # USA2012??? 2012-07-08 07:27
Do the people of the United States realize how we've been all to well conditioned to be susceptible to marketing? If we can't see through the millions of dollars used to market an ideology such as what the GOP has very successful managed compared to that of the Democrats, we should all now be aware of the devastating results of having done so.

Do you honestly believe the majority of the US doesn't believe we're suffering the consequences of "Global Warming"? If not, ask those whose lives have be ravaged by the affects of this man made catastrophe: are you up to your eyeballs in flood water people?

People stop being lead by the nose simply due to extremely overt marketing tactics to influence your support that is negatively contributing to your own demise.

Money cannot and will not buy everything: WAKE UP! In this country the only counter to this very lopsided political system is to use your vote. If your elected officials do not represent you best interests vote these government sanctioned felons out of office period! These people are guilty of "Breach of contract" for not working on your behalf!
 
 
+1 # Kayjay 2012-07-09 14:15
Democracy, circa 2012.... simply comes down to whomever has access to the biggest pile of cash, often wins the office. Promote the general welfare of all citizens... is an antiquated notion at best.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN