Koff reports: "He said he signed a multi-year contract, but would not discuss the terms. As for the possibility of getting rich off TV, he said, 'I never look at the world in those terms.'"
Former Democratic Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio has joined Fox News Channel and Fox Business as a paid contributor. (photo: Getty Images)
Dennis Kucinich Signs on As Fox News Commentator
17 January 13
ennis Kucinich has years of experience speaking on the House of Representatives floor, on the stump and in political debates. He likes to mix it up.
So it's only natural that the Fox News Channel should announce him as its newest contributor.
That's right, the man every Clevelander knows simply as "Dennis" is launching a part-time career as a Fox News commentator. Kucinich, 66, a former Cleveland mayor, will debut in his new role on "The O'Reilly Factor" at 8 p.m. Thursday. He'll soon appear on a variety of other Fox programs as well, sometimes once a week, sometimes more often.
"I'm really looking forward to it," Kucinich told The Plain Dealer in a telephone interview. "I've had a good relationship with Fox over the years. They've always been open to letting me express my point of view."
He said he signed a multi-year contract, but would not discuss the terms. As for the possibility of getting rich off TV, he said, "I never look at the world in those terms."
The deal came together quickly, after Fox asked him to come to New York last week, he said.
"This was not negotiated by an agent," he said, adding when asked that he only discussed doing commentary and analysis and did not talk about having his own show.
"They contacted me directly. My wife and I went to New York to hear what they were offering me, to review the contract and to sign it."
Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes said he's always been impressed with Kucinich's fearlessness and thoughtfulness on the issues, reported the Associated Press, which broke the news out of New York.
"His willingness to take a stand from his point of view makes him a valuable voice in our country's debate," Ailes said in a statement emailed to The Plain Dealer.
About that point of view: Kucinich is notably liberal. Fox is noted for its conservatism.
Fans of Kucinich's politics -- his calls for a Department of Peace, his early opposition to wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, his desire to impeach Vice President Dick Cheney during the Bush administration, his insistence on single-payer, universal health care -- are more likely to be in MSNBC's television audience. Some of them might argue that Kucinich is going to the network of the dark side.
Kucinich sounds thrilled by the very idea.
"All networks provide a service," he said. "People who are familiar with my perspective know that I relish the opportunity to go into the lion's den.
"I don't yield to anybody on standing up for what I believe in," he continued. "If all you do is talk to people who agree with you, how are you going to change anybody's mind?"
After serving as a Cleveland council member and mayor, state legislator, two-time presidential candidate and 16-year congressman, Kucinich left the House of Representatives this month. His former district and that of fellow Democrat Marcy Kaptur of Toledo were merged by Republicans who controlled Ohio's redistricting process, and Kaptur won the subsequent primary election against the Clevelander last year.
Fox said Kucinich will provide analysis and commentary across its daytime and prime-time programming, as well as on Fox Business Network.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
One can only hope...I don't know...he's in the tiger cage. Ugh...bad choice, really.
N.
Fox and it's talking heads are not "conservatives" ! They are selfatives: self-agrandizin g, self-centered, self-righteous, self-serving, and plain old selfish! Liberals can be conservative about some things but radical Republicans who want to make drastic changes in our laws and regulations in favor of the super rich and their corporations, or for religious fanatics, or for gun lovers, are not "conservative", they are SELFATIVES!
Dennis is unyielding and unable to prevail as a result. It's why Marcy Kaptur won their primary. She is a progressive who is able to negotiate.
As opposed to the rest of the "yielding" democratic party that has "prevailed"? Sorry, but the "new democrats" have done nothing but "yield" and the result has been that they have agreed to "end welfare as we know it" and brought us financial dergulation (ending Glass-Steagal) and "free trade" such as NAFTA that accelerated the outsourcing of decently paid (i.e., Union) jobs and led to the creation of mostly low-wage, no benefit dead end jobs (for those that could even find those).
As for being able to "negotiate"...w hen you abandon your principles before the negotiations have even started you have basically agreed to give away the store and thus are negotiating from a position of extreme weakness (if not total defeat) and thus what you get in return is basically nothing.
There is a happy medium between talking to the choir — the hardy little band of purity progressives who supported Dennis' two presidential runs — and speaking to your hardcore opposition whose opinions have been set in stone, fossilized by many years of living in their own unreality created by Fox "News." That's not a place where Dennis can sow seeds & change minds — the middle or pragmatic progressives is more fertile territory. He will sway no one one Fox. So either they are hoping he is so ridiculous that he reinforces that they're right to believe what they do, or he Lie-bermans Democrats, allowing those on the right to once again feel better about their preconceived beliefs.
A new reader seeing your observation might well conclude that preconceived beliefs, set in stone and fossilized by many years of living in their own unreality may exist outside of Fox News viewers and, perchance, might even exist on this site, perhaps even in this very thread.
Why don't we revisit the issue after we have ACTUALLY seen Dennis at work as Fox News commentator?
Just saying.....
As for Dennis, he gets to be heard on a regular basis, something that not even being a legitimate Presidential candidate
got him. Plus it pays the bills.
My guess, is that he will likely appear more frequently on O'Reilly than on Hannity; mainly because O'Reilly is capable of engaging in an intelligent conversation, while Hannity doesn't have that ability, manily due to his lack of intelligence.
And it may even backfire on Fox, if Kucinich is allowed the time to fully express his views and is kept away from the Fox & friends silly people; maybe some of the kneejerk Romney voters ("Obama hasn't done anything" or "Liberals are radicals") just might realize they have been lied to.
And there, in your last sentence, MEB, is the reason I believe FOX has hired Dennis: they want to increase their audience, and they think bringing in a popular Liberal will get them a lot more listeners.
I'd love to hear Dennis tear into them, but I don't think I can stomach FAUX even for him.
YOUR last sentence I agree with. When a more liberal...or simply a reasonable person is on a program with right wingers, they are usually talked over...or SCREAMED down.
,
It is difficult to watch, and I find myself yelling at the TV in frustration, for when a person is not allowed to finish a point they can come out looking bad or not very bright.
I do wonder how Dennis will manage.
So, in other words, we shouldn't even try and talk to Fox listeners? Sorry, but i just don't understand the supposed "logic" or "wisdom" of this position if this is in fact what you're advocating.
,
It is difficult to watch, and I find myself yelling at the TV in frustration, for when a person is not allowed to finish a point they can come out looking bad or not very bright."
And of course this never happens on MSNBC... Get real!
This behavior is the new face of confrontational "journalism," as "opinionism" is often called. This is the current face of the right AND the left.
If anyone has a chance of goosing Faux News viewers into laughter, thereby opening the door into their shut down brains, it's Dennis. What the hell, it's worth a try.
Dennis is "a fringe guy" because the democratic party itself chose to completely marginalize its progressive wing (look at the influence of the Congressional Progressive Caucus for example despite the fact that it is the largest caucus in Congress) largely thanks to Bill Clinton and the "new democrats." This strategy has been a complete disaster. The point is not to bring "liberal listeners" to Fox but rather to have a genuinely progressive and articulate voice (with bona fide blue-collar roots) have a platform and a voice to speak directly to the Fox audience and challenge the garbage they routinely and repeatedly spew.
All bringing any liberal to the Fox airwaves does is hopefully keep the majority of liberals from boycotting and protesting their sponsors... The appearance of fair and balanced... Not the reality.
Sorta like how many people can we draw for women and mud wrestling ...?
I don't believe this, I don't think right wing AM radio could possibly be bankrolled by impotence and baldness cures ... the advertisers are owned by the right wing and funnel money to the programming they like.
And just like China selling us cheap stuff for market share, they are giving us Kucinich to draw eyes away from other channels or for some strategic reason that probably has nothing to do with commericals.
And there, in your last sentence, MEB, is the reason I believe FOX has hired Dennis: they want to increase their audience, and they think bringing in a popular Liberal will get them a lot more listeners."
Would it be "bad" if hiring smart progressives who speak out against going to war and for sensible regulations, against fracking and for protecting our environment, for civil liberties and justice, brings listeners and improves the bottom line? I say alleluia.
If it is indeed a war that is and has been going on for years for the heart and minds of the nation, why is FOX risking their 'capital' in this way? The first rule of war is "know thy enemy." FOX NEWS did not get to where it is today by being stupid. It has tremendous power, all ill gotten, so why put their reputation at risk? I am extremely suspicious of this move by FOX NEWS and will not watch when Dennis is on. I wish him success and hope this really backfires on FOX NEWS. I keep on referring to FOX NEWS and not FOX non news, since I enjoy the many shows that I get to see for free.
Let RSN bring us news from the frontlines.
b) After all the years of service he deserves to do what he wants. He may have a larger audience on TV than in office.
Here's hoping FOX does not have him cast as Court Jester only- or if they do that he can outFOX them at it. Thank you Mr Kucinich, I still have hopes for a cabinet level Department of Peace.
Why would I waste time on such fare? Do you watch the crap? lol.
I wonder and worry if Dennis is meant to be a punching bag for O'Reilly? I very much doubt that O'Reilly will treat him with respect. He may have to work really hard for the money, and swallow a lot more than he likes.
Wellstone was a true progressive but so is Kucinich and he has proven it consistantly since his days as mayor of Cincinatti. By what stretch of the imagination (and it is only through imagination as opposed to reason or reality that one could make such a charge or claim about Kucinich) did you feel it necessary to make such a disparaging comment against one of the only real progressives/ra dicals in Congress (Bernie Sanders now being the only one of these in the Senate)?
All the very best of success...we will all benefit.
So that will be NEVER.
Second: It's a reminder, once again, that Fox News is not in business to support the Republicans or the Tea Party or Homer Simpson.... Fox News is in business to make money. If they can make money with Dennis Kucinich, they'll put Dennis Kucinich on television.
That's how capitalism works. If Dick Nixon and Mitt Romney can make money through deals with Communist China, they'll sign contracts with the Reds.
the fact that FOX is free to operate is an homage to the failure of our government reining in capitalism's 'dark side'.
Another hero going bastard.
GREED is the word.
I mean will Sean Hannity be given a spot on MSNBC soon to give the reactionary perspective? -Maybe it's like prisoner-swap.
I canna see FOX's demographic swallowing DK if it's not a spoof and especially if he's allowed to speak freely (Remember Hannity and Colmes, his glove puppet "liberal"??).
Either way, it still won't persuade me to watch Muck-doc's favorite baby, whatever their motives, including trying to give some credence to their phony "Fair and balanced" claim. It still won't counter balance their other effusions of junk-and juggle journalism, with it's blonde-babe cheerleaders.
MSNBC actually is pretty close to fair and balanced and is the only network that can make that claim honestly. Not ABC, CBS or NBC, certainly not Fox, although our local Fox news is not what the network Faux news is.
Well, the first half of that has validity, but if you know anything ablot him you know the rest of it is uncalled for and disgusting without an iota of truth.
Dennis Kucinich, an arch Liberal with 16 years experience in Congress, is hired by FOX News, an arch Conservative, rich & powerful Right-Wing mouth piece, as a commentator.
Why did they do this and why did Dennis agree to do this?
Obviously, FOX has not decided to get rid of its spots, or should I say 'stains.' They want to get Liberal & Progressive viewers to tune in and watch the battle unfold. Will Dennis be able to match wits and voice level with the likes of O'Reilly and Hannity? Tune in folks and see for yourself (advertises take note...our ad prices may be going up, so lock in your time now).
If new viewers do tune in, they will be subject to the poison that FOX spews out minute by minute when Dennis is not on, or even when he is on! Best thing to do is NOT WATCH DENNIS on FOX no matter what! D. K. is taking a chance going into the 'Lions' den. Let FOX pay him oodles of money and expose their 'ditto-heads' to D. K.'s brand of common sense thinking. It might just tip the balance a bit, not much, but a bit.
We will hear about anything drastic that may happen on air through all kinds of media outlets, but let us not play FOX's game. If FOX doesn't get a up swing in their Lib/Prog viewers then they might, after a time, find some reason to get rid of D. K. But he has 'long term' contract, and worst comes to worst, FOX gets shown up for being the rancid leopard we always knew it to be, warty, boil-like spots and all. How sweet!
If your curious I am sure John Stewart or maybe Rachel Maddow will cover what is going on .
Don't help Fox raise their ratings !
Both Stewart and Maddow are virtually uncritical of anything Obama and the rest of the democrats do. Is that your idea of the role of a "progressive"? Kucinich has always been truly independent and truly progressive and he should be commended for jumping on the opportunity to talk to millions of Fox viewers; something most progressives either don't have the guts to do or don't have the ability to do it intelligently or with any hope of reaching them as evidenced by many of the comments on this board.
Because that's what they do to Colmes and if you ever heard his radio show, which is BRILLIANT, you'd be amazed at the difference.
He really is an amazing broadcaster. I don't hear much radio and he's not in LA but he is the reason I subscribe to FoxNews radio, I think I am still subb'd, anyway.
"sapping the energy of progressives in congress"...giv e me a break...if they had any less energy they would need to go on medication to wake them up. Now, while the proposals from the Congressional Progressive caucus (of which Dennis was a member) are generally very good (see their budget proposal for example) when it comes to actually standing up and fighting for it or any other truly progressive cause they have totally wimped out again and again. To call someone who is principled "obstructionist " is absurd. And it was the "new democrats" such as Bill Clinton (and now Obama) -- hardly progressives -- that ran and continue to run the party off the cliff such that they have given away the store (financial deregulation, welfare "reform", NAFTA "free trade", the wars, NDAA, drone warfare, and now they're going to give in to "entitlement reform" --- all things Dennis has opposed and fought against). So, who's being "bamboozld"?
Couldn't you have found a more reputable outlet than Fox ? What are you thinking ? I don't think its brave I think its down right foolish and it will tarnish your reputation !If you lay down with dogs your gonna get fleas !
About that point of view: Kucinich is notably liberal. Fox is noted for its conservatism."
I have two corrections to make: what FOX is doing has little to do with debate. And they are not conservatives. Let us call them what they are: extreme right-wing.
FOX has little to fear from Kucinich in terms of tarnishing it's image as a conservative bellwether media institution. (The main people who would be worried are right-wing politicians.) It gives FOX the appearance of legitimacy to have someone like Kucinich on their staff. Expect the structure and time allocated to Dennis to be limited, probably by the implicit structure of his position. Personally, I hoping he can still surprise their executives and financial mavens by putting a few guests on the hot seat and raising uncomfortable issues.
The other thing is that FOX spends much time criticizing the liberal wing of the establishment. Because Dennis is critical of this establishment from the Left leads FOX to believe that he can function as a foil for their attacks on liberals. It remains to be seen if he will be allowed to criticize both liberal and conservative elements of the establishment-- and the political/econo mic structure itself-- on an equal basis. FOX probably views Dennis as someone they can trot out to unhinge liberal Democrats and thus add strength to right-wing positions. The question is whether he will also be allowed to address the Koch brothers, the Cheneys, and their ilk on sensitive subjects.
Hiring Dennis shows how little FOX fears the non-establishme nt Left. Maybe Kucinich will show them that "We the People" are not a force to be dismissed lightly, and that they have a "tiger by the tail."
Wishful thinking .
Anyone whose foolish enough to watch Fox to find out is only doing Fox a favor by boosting their ratings !
Do I have to say it a million times to get through to some of you ?Wake up ,don't watch and let Fox fail in the ratings and be done with them once and for all !
Though I applaud your intent to starve the beast, I'm not sure that avoiding FOX news makes much difference to the network, financially speaking, unless you represent the demographic of their sponsors. FOXes' business is selling eyeballs of a particular nature (conservative, in this case) to their corporate sponsors, and creating more sympathetic eyeballs when possible. This is the difference between "demand" and "effective demand." To wit, there is demand for food if many people are starving, but if they have no money, there is no "effective demand." It makes no systemic difference to the suppliers. Such is the nature of capitalism.
FOX sponsors will be nervous when conservatives desert the network.
I continue to hope that Kucinich can convert a few conservatives who are watching FOX. They, of course, have the opposite hope that he will lure in liberals who will be converted to conservatism. But, I won't hold my breath or change my viewing habits for their addition of Dennis. Anything insightful or controversial that he says will be picked up elsewhere on the web.
Naw ... Dennis doesn't have an ego, that's why he married the centerfold bombshell who is taller than he is.
RSS feed for comments to this post