RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "Drought, wildfires, hurricanes and heatwaves are becoming normal in America because of climate change, Congress was told on Wednesday in the first hearing on climate science in more than two years."

Half of US counties are now considered drought-stricken disaster areas. Rows of corn stalks stand under a cloudless sky south of Blair, Neb., Monday. The drought-damaged field was cut down for silage. (photo: Nati Harnik/AP)
Half of US counties are now considered drought-stricken disaster areas. Rows of corn stalks stand under a cloudless sky south of Blair, Neb., Monday. The drought-damaged field was cut down for silage. (photo: Nati Harnik/AP)



Scientists to Senate: Climate Change Causing Extreme Weather

By Suzanne Goldenberg, Guardian UK

02 August 12

 

rought, wildfires, hurricanes and heatwaves are becoming normal in America because of climate change, Congress was told on Wednesday in the first hearing on climate science in more than two years.

In a predictably contentious hearing, the Senate's environment and public works committee heard from a lead scientist for the UN's climate body, the IPCC, on the growing evidence linking extreme weather and climate change.

"It is critical to understand that the link between climate change and the kinds of extremes that lead to disaster is clear," Christopher Field, a lead author of the IPCC report and director of global ecology at the Carnegie Institute for Science, said in testimony.

"There is no doubt that climate has changed," he went on. "There is also no doubt that a changing climate changes the risks of extremes, including extremes that can lead to disaster."

He later told the committee that those climate-related disasters would have profound effects on industry and agriculture.

Field was the first IPCC scientist to appear before the committee since February 2009. It was a time when there was real optimism about prospects for action on climate change under the new Obama Administration.

By Wednesday, however, it was universally acknowledged there was no prospect of moving climate change legislation through Congress. There was also little chance the scientists' presentations would persuade the most prominent Republican climate contrarian, Senator Jim Inhofe, who told the committee: "The global warming movement has completely collapsed."

Senator Barbara Boxer, the California Democrat who chairs the committee, also noted she had deliberately avoid calling any administration officials or government scientists.

The Republican's campaign against Obama's green agenda, with their attacks on the Environmental Protection Agency and his clean energy loans, would make their presence a political distraction, she indicated.

But Boxer told reporters before the hearing she had faced growing pressure from the public to air the issue of climate change. The Republican-controlled House has turned down 15 requests from Democrats for a similar hearing.

Field, in his testimony, warned that the devastating extremes of the last year could soon become routine.

"The US experienced 14 billion-dollar disasters in 2011, a record that surpasses the previous maximum of 9," he said. "The 2011 disasters included a blizzard, tornadoes, floods, severe weather, a hurricane, a tropical storm, drought and heatwaves, and wildfires. In 2012, we have already experienced horrifying wildfires, a powerful windstorm that hit Washington DC, heat waves in much of the country, and a massive drought."

He went on to make a point of warning Texans that the future of farming and ranching could be put in jeopardy because of climate change.

The committee also heard from James McCarthy, a Harvard oceanographer and IPCC author, who warned that sea-level rise was occurring about three times faster than scientists believed even a decade ago.

The hearing quickly veered off course from reviewing the latest climate science to the intractable politics surrounding climate change in America.

In one of the liveliest exchanges, Bernie Sanders of Vermont continued his effort to take down Inhofe for his statements that climate change is a hoax and a conspiracy.

Sanders asked the scientists on the panel for their opinions on some of Inhofe's more notorious assertions – that climate change is a hoax, that the planet is actually in a state of cooling, and that such environmental concerns were a conspiracy by the UN, Al Gore, and Hollywood.

The scientists did not support Inhofe's claims.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+34 # portiz 2012-08-02 07:51
Is it irony, or idiocy, that deniers will claim that climate scientists are perpetuating a hoax so that they can get a few grants, while not recognizing that the deniers are themselves being funded by companies that will continue to make billions by maintaining our addiction to fossil fuels?!
 
 
+26 # Stephen 2012-08-02 08:33
Senator Jim Inhofe, who told the committee: "The global warming movement has completely collapsed."

He should try telling that to mother earth! Climate, and climate change, is not a "movement"! What an a*hole.
 
 
-22 # MidwestTom 2012-08-02 08:46
Do some research on vapor trails and their effect on climate. There are several very scary reports. Governments could be causing this to make everyone dependent on them for food.
 
 
-2 # NewYorkScribe 2012-08-02 12:16
Read the information on Chemtrails in the environment section on Reader Supported News. (More Information on Chemtrails). Monsanto has created aluminum resistant seeds and our land is covered with aluminum, barium and strontium to name a few metals that have been sprayed almost 24/7 all over the country and the world. Making rain is big business and geo-engineering of the weather needs to be exposed for the unregulated and powerful tool it is. Creating floods and droughts and otherwise altering weather should not be in the hands of a handful of private corporations, which can put local municipalities at their mercy offering to deliver rain or withhold it for a price.
 
 
+2 # Holmes 2012-08-02 17:19
Not sure what the issue is re breeding plants with greater tolerance to aluminum is. Aluminum is found in all soils with clay in them as it is part of the basic clay molecule. In low pH - aluminum ions increase and many plants find these ion toxic. Solution, raise pH via line etc.

Re contrails, often seen in WW2 from all high altitude bombers if conditions were right. If a conspiracy, how do you keep something quiet that long? Yes the trails do affect temps as they are they are clouds of condensed water similar to naturally formed clouds. There has been some work done on WW2 temp data and aircraft activity.
 
 
-1 # Anarchist 23 2012-08-02 14:08
Quoting MidwestTom:
Do some research on vapor trails and their effect on climate. There are several very scary reports. Governments could be causing this to make everyone dependent on them for food.

Hi Midwest Tom-do you mean chem-trails-fir st proposed by Dr. Edward Teller to combat climate change? They do exist, they are scarey and most people won't believe you even if you point the things out to them!!! They are also a mixture of aluminum and barium and other nasty things. I hear Monsanto is developing a seed that can grow in alumina contaminated soil. Hmmmm.....
 
 
0 # NCcoachie 2012-08-03 10:08
Monsanto is woking with NASA to develop soy, rice, and corn that can be grown in extreme cold and will thrive in a non oxygenated low H2O environment so we can begin our exodus to the moon
 
 
+12 # douglassmyth 2012-08-02 10:16
Midwest Tom, look around you at the dying cornfields, etc. How are governments going to make us dependent on their food, when we can't grow it because of drought?

This contrail conspiracy theory is the stupidest of a long list: the real conspiracy is the fossil fuel industry (global) that wants to keep on selling their owned reserves, and doesn't want any government to tell them that burning carbon has to be restricted. Why they'll lose their investments! Better we all be driven to starvation, or to recolonize the warming Arctic!
 
 
+6 # seeuingoa 2012-08-02 10:17
Nothing is happening in America before
you have flooding of Manhattan, drought
and wildfires in the Midwest, Fukushima/
earthquakes in California, and oilspill
catastrophies in the Arctic.


I think it was the most stupid of the
Europeans who immigrated to the land of
greed 200 years ago.

Wake up please.
 
 
+13 # xflowers 2012-08-02 10:52
We need an outside strategy to lessen the effects of climate change. Holding congressional hearings to debate the issue is a waste of time when we've got paid off buffoons holding office. Besides, the debate is over whether Inhofe knows it or not. He is no longer relevant.
 
 
+4 # Regina 2012-08-02 21:19
Science is not a basis for debate -- science requires analysis. We don't get a choice or a vote on a scientific issue -- we research it to the best of our ability and arrive at a conclusion, which is then subjected to independent testing, not sales pitches or political "debates." The fact that too many Americans don't know this is an indictment of American education. Ditto for the fact that American students score way down on international tests in science and math. Inhofe is indeed irrelevant as well as ignorant..
 
 
+6 # pbbrodie 2012-08-03 05:45
Inhofe has never been relevant but he IS, unfortunately, extremely dangerous. What is truly scary is that there are states and districts that elect people like Inhofe and Michelle Bachman and then reelect them over and again, despite the unbelievably stupid things they say and do. There is evidently a very large proportion of our citizens who actually want to see our country crash and burn.
 
 
+11 # robniel 2012-08-02 13:58
It's instructive to note that except for one physicist, Congress is not only scientifically illiterate but actually hostile towards science (and everything else they don't understand except the big lie).
 
 
+4 # C.Gill 2012-08-02 20:59
Most in Congress profess that the Earth is 6000 years old and deny evolution.
 
 
0 # ecovortx 2012-08-03 16:29
When will humanity wake up that 1 + 1 = 1. If we do not find a way to work together as one, humanity will make the earth inhabitable for humanity! We are doing to ourselves what many species have done before us. In most cases, it was either a volcano or meteor that made the change. We are doing it to ourselves for what? Ego!
 
 
+1 # Regina 2012-08-03 18:55
I presume that you mean UNINHABITABLE for humanity -- impossible to live in. We are doing it to ourselves out of ignorance and simplistic thought, not merely ego. We're conditioned to be most comfortable believing that something intangible -- like "God" -- will save us from the consequences of ignorance (ours) and greed (the wealth-and-powe r elite's).
 
 
0 # Texas Aggie 2012-08-04 22:14
I like the reference to Inhofe as the "contrarian." There is a big difference between a skeptic, i.e., a person who doubts something for a reason, but will change his mind when his reason is shown to be false, vs. a contrarian, i.e. a person who has made up his mind to not believe something no matter what. A skeptic can be reasoned with. A contrarian is best either left alone or, if they become too dangerous, isolated where they can't do any harm.

If the term got more into the conversation and these deniers were called contrarians rather than skeptics, there would be the advantage of accuracy and also they would have a label with less cachet than skeptic.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN