Intro: "Drought, wildfires, hurricanes and heatwaves are becoming normal in America because of climate change, Congress was told on Wednesday in the first hearing on climate science in more than two years."
Half of US counties are now considered drought-stricken disaster areas. Rows of corn stalks stand under a cloudless sky south of Blair, Neb., Monday. The drought-damaged field was cut down for silage. (photo: Nati Harnik/AP)
Scientists to Senate: Climate Change Causing Extreme Weather
02 August 12
rought, wildfires, hurricanes and heatwaves are becoming normal in America because of climate change, Congress was told on Wednesday in the first hearing on climate science in more than two years.
In a predictably contentious hearing, the Senate's environment and public works committee heard from a lead scientist for the UN's climate body, the IPCC, on the growing evidence linking extreme weather and climate change.
"It is critical to understand that the link between climate change and the kinds of extremes that lead to disaster is clear," Christopher Field, a lead author of the IPCC report and director of global ecology at the Carnegie Institute for Science, said in testimony.
"There is no doubt that climate has changed," he went on. "There is also no doubt that a changing climate changes the risks of extremes, including extremes that can lead to disaster."
He later told the committee that those climate-related disasters would have profound effects on industry and agriculture.
Field was the first IPCC scientist to appear before the committee since February 2009. It was a time when there was real optimism about prospects for action on climate change under the new Obama Administration.
By Wednesday, however, it was universally acknowledged there was no prospect of moving climate change legislation through Congress. There was also little chance the scientists' presentations would persuade the most prominent Republican climate contrarian, Senator Jim Inhofe, who told the committee: "The global warming movement has completely collapsed."
Senator Barbara Boxer, the California Democrat who chairs the committee, also noted she had deliberately avoid calling any administration officials or government scientists.
The Republican's campaign against Obama's green agenda, with their attacks on the Environmental Protection Agency and his clean energy loans, would make their presence a political distraction, she indicated.
But Boxer told reporters before the hearing she had faced growing pressure from the public to air the issue of climate change. The Republican-controlled House has turned down 15 requests from Democrats for a similar hearing.
Field, in his testimony, warned that the devastating extremes of the last year could soon become routine.
"The US experienced 14 billion-dollar disasters in 2011, a record that surpasses the previous maximum of 9," he said. "The 2011 disasters included a blizzard, tornadoes, floods, severe weather, a hurricane, a tropical storm, drought and heatwaves, and wildfires. In 2012, we have already experienced horrifying wildfires, a powerful windstorm that hit Washington DC, heat waves in much of the country, and a massive drought."
He went on to make a point of warning Texans that the future of farming and ranching could be put in jeopardy because of climate change.
The committee also heard from James McCarthy, a Harvard oceanographer and IPCC author, who warned that sea-level rise was occurring about three times faster than scientists believed even a decade ago.
The hearing quickly veered off course from reviewing the latest climate science to the intractable politics surrounding climate change in America.
In one of the liveliest exchanges, Bernie Sanders of Vermont continued his effort to take down Inhofe for his statements that climate change is a hoax and a conspiracy.
Sanders asked the scientists on the panel for their opinions on some of Inhofe's more notorious assertions – that climate change is a hoax, that the planet is actually in a state of cooling, and that such environmental concerns were a conspiracy by the UN, Al Gore, and Hollywood.
The scientists did not support Inhofe's claims.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
He should try telling that to mother earth! Climate, and climate change, is not a "movement"! What an a*hole.
Re contrails, often seen in WW2 from all high altitude bombers if conditions were right. If a conspiracy, how do you keep something quiet that long? Yes the trails do affect temps as they are they are clouds of condensed water similar to naturally formed clouds. There has been some work done on WW2 temp data and aircraft activity.
Hi Midwest Tom-do you mean chem-trails-fir st proposed by Dr. Edward Teller to combat climate change? They do exist, they are scarey and most people won't believe you even if you point the things out to them!!! They are also a mixture of aluminum and barium and other nasty things. I hear Monsanto is developing a seed that can grow in alumina contaminated soil. Hmmmm.....
This contrail conspiracy theory is the stupidest of a long list: the real conspiracy is the fossil fuel industry (global) that wants to keep on selling their owned reserves, and doesn't want any government to tell them that burning carbon has to be restricted. Why they'll lose their investments! Better we all be driven to starvation, or to recolonize the warming Arctic!
you have flooding of Manhattan, drought
and wildfires in the Midwest, Fukushima/
earthquakes in California, and oilspill
catastrophies in the Arctic.
I think it was the most stupid of the
Europeans who immigrated to the land of
greed 200 years ago.
Wake up please.
If the term got more into the conversation and these deniers were called contrarians rather than skeptics, there would be the advantage of accuracy and also they would have a label with less cachet than skeptic.
RSS feed for comments to this post