RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "Scientists at Nasa admitted they thought satellite readings were a mistake after images showed 97% surface melt over four days."

The Greenland ice sheet on July 8, left, and four days later on the right. In the image, the areas classified as 'probable melt' (light pink) correspond to those sites where at least one satellite detected surface melting. The areas classified as 'melt' (dark pink) correspond to sites where two or three satellites detected surface melting. (photo: NASA)
The Greenland ice sheet on July 8, left, and four days later on the right. In the image, the areas classified as 'probable melt' (light pink) correspond to those sites where at least one satellite detected surface melting. The areas classified as 'melt' (dark pink) correspond to sites where two or three satellites detected surface melting. (photo: NASA)



Scientists Shocked by Greenland Ice Melt

By Suzanne Goldenberg, Guardian UK

26 July 12

 

See Also: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jul/25/greenland-glacier-bridge-destroyed-video

he Greenland ice sheet melted at a faster rate this month than at any other time in recorded history, with virtually the entire ice sheet showing signs of thaw.

The rapid melting over just four days was captured by three satellites. It has stunned and alarmed scientists, and deepened fears about the pace and future consequences of climate change.

In a statement posted on Nasa's website on Tuesday, scientists admitted the satellite data was so striking they thought at first there had to be a mistake.

"This was so extraordinary that at first I questioned the result: was this real or was it due to a data error?" Son Nghiem of Nasa's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena said in the release.

He consulted with several colleagues, who confirmed his findings. Dorothy Hall, who studies the surface temperature of Greenland at Nasa's space flight centre in Greenbelt, Maryland, confirmed that the area experienced unusually high temperatures in mid-July, and that there was widespread melting over the surface of the ice sheet.

Climatologists Thomas Mote, at the University of Georgia, and Marco Tedesco, of the City University of New York, also confirmed the melt recorded by the satellites.

However, scientists were still coming to grips with the shocking images on Tuesday. "I think it's fair to say that this is unprecedented," Jay Zwally, a glaciologist at Nasa's Goddard Space Flight Center, told the Guardian.

The set of images released by Nasa on Tuesday show a rapid thaw between 8 July and 12 July. Within that four-day period, measurements from three satellites showed a swift expansion of the area of melting ice, from about 40% of the ice sheet surface to 97%.

Scientists attributed the sudden melt to a heat dome, or a burst of unusually warm air, which hovered over Greenland from 8 July until 16 July.

Greenland had returned to more typical summer conditions by 21 or 22 July, Mote told the Guardian.

But he said the event, while exceptional, should be viewed alongside other compelling evidence of climate change, including on the ground in Greenland.

"What we are seeing at the highest elevations may be a sort of sign of what is going on across the ice sheet," he said. "At lower elevations on the ice sheet, we are seeing earlier melting, melting later in the season, and more frequent melting over the last 30 years and that is consistent of what you would expect with a warming climate."

Zwally, who has made almost yearly trips to the Greenland ice sheet for more than three decades, said he had never seen such a rapid melt.

About half of Greenland's surface ice sheet melts during a typical summer, but Zwally said he and other scientists had been recording an acceleration of that melting process over the last few decades. This year his team had to rebuild their camp, at Swiss Station, when the snow and ice supports melted.

He said he had never seen such a rapid melt over his three decades of nearly yearly trips to the Greenland ice sheet. He was most surprised to see indications in the images of melting even around the area of Summit Station, which is about two miles above sea level.

It was the second unusual event in Greenland in a matter of days, after an iceberg the size of Manhattan broke off from the Petermann glacier. But the rapid melt was viewed as more serious.

"If you look at the 8 July image that might be the maximum extent of warming you would see in the summer," Zwally noted. "There have been periods when melting might have occurred at higher elevations briefly – maybe for a day or so – but to have it cover the whole of Greenland like this is unknown, certainly in the time of satellite records."

Jason Box, a glaciologist at Ohio State University who returned on Tuesday from a research trip to Greenland, had been predicting a big melt year for 2012, because of earlier melt and a decline in summer snow flurries.

He said the heat dome was not necessarily a one-off. "This is now the seventh summer in a row with this pattern of warm air being lifted up onto the ice sheet on the summer months," he said. "What is surprising is just how persistent this circulation anomaly is. Here it is back again for the seventh year in a row in the summer bringing hot, warm air onto the ice sheet."

He also said surfaces at higher elevation, now re-frozen, could be more prone to future melting, because of changes in the structure of the snow crystals. Box expected melting to continue at lower elevations.

About half of Greenland's surface ice sheet melts during a typical summer, but Zwally said he and other scientists had been recording an acceleration of that melting process over the past few decades. This year his team had to rebuild their camp, at Swiss Station, when the snow and ice supports melted.

Lora Koenig, another Goddard glaciologist, told Nasa similar rapid melting occurs about every 150 years. But she warned there were wide-ranging potential implications from this year's thaw.

"If we continue to observe melting events like this in upcoming years, it will be worrisome." she told Nasa.

The most immediate consequences are sea level rise and a further warming of the Arctic. In the centre of Greenland, the ice remains up to 3,000 metres deep. On the edges, however, the ice is much, much thinner and has been melting into the sea.

The melting ice sheet is a significant factor in sea level rise. Scientists attribute about one-fifth of the annual sea level rise, which is about 3mm every year, to the melting of the Greenland ice sheet.

In this instance of this month's extreme melting, Mote said there was evidence of a heat dome over Greenland: or an unusually strong ridge of warm air.

The dome is believed to have moved over Greenland on 8 July, lingering until 16 July.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+20 # grouchy 2012-07-26 07:37
Of course this isn't happening--just ask the fossil fuel guys!
 
 
+7 # Billy Bob 2012-07-26 08:40
Don't worry. Many of them aren't that hard to find on these very threads.
 
 
+9 # Abigail 2012-07-26 07:43
Goodbye Florida
 
 
+7 # Billy Bob 2012-07-26 08:45
Goodbye global food supply.
 
 
+1 # TalkingStick 2012-07-27 05:52
Goodbye life!
 
 
+7 # hillwright 2012-07-26 07:59
Drill and dig. That's the future.
Greenland will not become green, but brown and gray.
 
 
+7 # jlvelardi 2012-07-26 08:12
Goodbye Jersey Shore.
 
 
+1 # Buddha 2012-07-28 07:48
OK, so there is ONE good positive to Global Warming. :-p
 
 
+7 # Billy Bob 2012-07-26 08:45
This isn't just about rising sea levels when it affects the Greenland ice sheet. This is about the real worst case scenario that we weren't supposed to even worry about for another 100 years, which is all of that fresh water melting into the North Atlantic.

The "fossil fuel guys" will get their way and be able to say, "See! We told you so! The Earth really wasn't heating up!",...

Because, this could cause the Atlantic Ocean to react in a way that causes another ice age. Ice ages can happen in less than a decade.

Do any of you like to eat food?
 
 
+11 # Texas Aggie 2012-07-26 13:34
Good point. To elaborate, the Gulf Stream, a warm water current out of the Gulf of Mexico that runs northeast across the Atlantic and keeps Europe a lot warmer than eastern Canada, would be seriously interfered with if the north Atlantic became significantly less saline. It would result in cooling, make that freezing, of Europe and possibly leading to glaciation similar to the ice ages. Decreasing salinity of the North Atlantic would certainly disturb lots of weather patterns and ocean currents with associated fish populations that we consider normal now.
 
 
+3 # Billy Bob 2012-07-26 14:46
Thank you for furthering my point. Lately, I've begun thinking of you as my favorite commenter on this site. Please keep up the good work.
 
 
+2 # TalkingStick 2012-07-27 05:54
On the other hand. Melt all the ice at the poles and all that heat from the sun that they have been reflecting out will be absorbed. It is not going to be pretty.
 
 
+2 # Billy Bob 2012-07-27 07:15
The problem is that by decreasing the salinity of the North Atlantic, the trend reverses... HARD, causing an ice age and, in effect, once again growing all of that snow and MUCH MUCH more all at once, which reflects more of that sunlight, and creates a spiral in the other direction.

It's like knocking over a baby's crib and arguing over which way the baby will fall. The balance is gone. That's the important point.
 
 
-13 # Howard T. Lewis III 2012-07-26 13:46
If you guys don't start cracking down on yourselves and studying HAARP and weather modification, I am going to hit your knuckles with a ruler. There is no Goddamned 'global warming'. In 1958, there were only small chunks of ice around the North pole. greeland melts and freezes, melts and freezes. Last week, the IPCC disavowed any involvement with their "bad science" that went into their original 'Global Warming' campaign. The minions of queen lizard and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are doing HAARP to cause radical weather so they can scoop up distressed farms and cull the herd with the illuminati genetic slag. Only one problem. They are caught but you bozos are not REACTING OR PAYING ATTENTION TO THIS. We have no Judicial Branch of central government loyal to the people and constitution of the U.S., so HELP OUT HERE.
 
 
+7 # Billy Bob 2012-07-26 14:49
You forgot about the space aliens! Surely the greys are behind this global conspiracy to dupe the whole world by the scientific community!

Good job! Now that we can't trust the scientific community (since they're all working for a galactic federation of grey aliens), we have no choice but to watch fox news, keep our mouths shut and do exactly what the fossil fuel industry want.

Otherwise, the greys win.
 
 
+5 # ericlipps 2012-07-26 14:52
Quoting Howard T. Lewis III:
If you guys don't start cracking down on yourselves and studying HAARP and weather modification, I am going to hit your knuckles with a ruler. There is no Goddamned 'global warming'. In 1958, there were only small chunks of ice around the North pole. greeland melts and freezes, melts and freezes. Last week, the IPCC disavowed any involvement with their "bad science" that went into their original 'Global Warming' campaign. The minions of queen lizard and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are doing HAARP to cause radical weather so they can scoop up distressed farms and cull the herd with the illuminati genetic slag. Only one problem. They are caught but you bozos are not REACTING OR PAYING ATTENTION TO THIS. We have no Judicial Branch of central government loyal to the people and constitution of the U.S., so HELP OUT HERE.


Either you're kidding opr you're calling essentially every comptent scientist who has studied the issue of global warming and isn't on some energy company's payroll a party to an evil conspiracy. And . . . "queen lizard"?

I don't suppose you have any actual evidence?
 
 
+1 # pbbrodie 2012-07-27 07:25
Ha, ha, ha! Boy, this is a good one. I don't know why you are getting all the red flags. I guess no one else appreciates your humor.
This was facetious, right?!
 
 
+5 # Robiodo 2012-07-26 14:18
An iceberg the size of Manhattan...and it's not as important as the rapid melting. Wow! Wait till this makes the MSM.
(Just joking about it making the MSM.)
 
 
+9 # angelfish 2012-07-26 16:34
Don't bother telling Congress, they're much too busy with Contraception and a Woman's right to self-determinat ion to be bothered by any Scientific fact!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN