Intro: "The Obama administration warned Wednesday that food supplies were at risk from the worsening drought afflicting more than half of the country and called on Congress to revive lapsed disaster aid programs."
Rodney Byars, center, walked ahead of his brother, Rich, through a field of dead and stalled corn this week in Geff, Ill. (photo: Robert Ray/AP)
Drought Puts Food at Risk, US Warns
19 July 12
he Obama administration warned Wednesday that food supplies were at risk from the worsening drought afflicting more than half of the country and called on Congress to revive lapsed disaster aid programs.
President Obama reviewed the situation with Tom Vilsack, the agriculture secretary, who called it “the most serious situation” in about 25 years and added that he was praying for rain.
“I get on my knees every day, and I’m saying an extra prayer now,” Mr. Vilsack told reporters at the White House after his discussions with Mr. Obama. “If I had a rain prayer or rain dance I could do, I would do it.”
Mr. Vilsack said 1,297 counties, or roughly a third of those in the nation, had been designated disaster areas. He said 39 more were being added on Wednesday.
More than three-quarters of the nation’s corn and soybean crops are in drought-affected areas, and more than a third of those crops are now rated poor to very poor, Mr. Vilsack said. The price of corn has increased in recent weeks by 38 percent, and the price of beans is up 24 percent. The country may still have the third-largest corn crop in history because earlier good weather encouraged planting, but Mr. Vilsack said the drought would increase food prices into 2013.
The cost of beef, poultry and pork may go down in the short term because those herds are being liquidated, putting more meat on the market, he said. But those prices will probably rise later in the year or early next year.
He declined to speculate on whether the drought was tied to climate change. “All we know is that right now there are a lot of farmers and ranchers who are struggling,” Mr. Vilsack said, adding that the priority should be “what we can do to help them.”
The administration has lowered the interest rate for emergency loans and has worked to streamline aid programs. Mr. Vilsack said Congress could help by restoring disaster programs that expired last year or by providing other assistance through the Food, Farm and Jobs Act, a pending overhaul of the nation’s nutrition and agriculture program.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
By the way, unless you own a farm, you won't be able to fix it yourself. This requires full participation of our entire nation (i.e. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION LAWS).
Until we accept the fact that we have to stop using oil, coal and natural gas, get used to worrying about the food supply.
Crisis used for means of specific corporate agenda advancement as I see it.....
Ethanol...good and bad to it environmentally and economically but any decision on that thing should not have as impetus apparently solely a crisis to determine its viability......
If needed import brazilian ethanol to meet the crisis...then no crisis...consid er the issue of ethanol in its entirety, to include trade barriers restricting its availability, and variability of supply.
I am sort of neutral on ethanol as it is environmentally destructive and competes with food for humans but see little good to be served by examining the issue under the gun of a singular crop failure.
As corporate media evidently hates it so much I am leaning in favor of it......certain ly if imported from brazil.
So I guess they are making up my mind in a way...vehement is their opposition to it......quite obvious.
RSS feed for comments to this post