Broder reports: "Shell has asked the Environmental Protection Agency to loosen air pollution requirements for its Discoverer drill rig, which is planning to begin exploratory drilling operations off the North Slope of Alaska early next month."
The Discoverer is expected to begin drilling for oil in the Arctic in August. (photo: AP)
Shell Seeks to Weaken Air Rules for Arctic Drilling
16 July 12
hell has asked the Environmental Protection Agency to loosen air pollution requirements for its Discoverer drill rig, which is planning to begin exploratory drilling operations off the North Slope of Alaska early next month.
In its application to the agency, dated June 28, Shell said the Discoverer cannot meet the requirements for emissions of nitrogen oxide and ammonia of an air permit granted by the E.P.A. in January. The company also asked for a minor air permit modification for its Kulluk drill ship, which is also supposed to begin work in the Arctic in the coming weeks.
An E.P.A. spokeswoman said the agency was reviewing the applications. Curtis Smith, a Shell spokesman, said he did not expect the permit changes to affect the drilling schedule, which has been set back several weeks because of unusually heavy sea ice.
Greenpeace and other groups opposed to oil and gas exploration in the Arctic said that Shell was trying at the 11th hour to change the terms under which it was granted permission to drill.
""This is a classic bait-and-switch," Greenpeace's executive director, Phil Radford, said. "Shell promises the E.P.A. - and by extension, the American people - anything that will allow it to get permits to drill the Arctic, and then at the last minute, Shell says it won't abide by its agreement and wants the E.P.A. to issue watered-down permits with no process whatsoever.
"This is just one more in a litany of broken promises from Shell when it comes to drilling in the Arctic," he said.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Don't you wish we had an EPA who could follow their legitimate duty by telling Shell just that?
Don't hold your bresth.
This is the same EPA that a whistleblower just caught spying on emails sent by its staffers that criticized practices. Nobody is supposed to criticized anything the EPA does!! Give the agency a bad name.
"Badder" than it already has?
Would be nice to think that Obama, if re-elected, would require the EPA to do its sworn duty. Dream on! He's in bed with the bad guys, sorry to say. He could have done so much better if he had
had cojones.
RSS feed for comments to this post