RSN June 14 Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Schmitt reports: "A small number of C.I.A. officers are operating secretly in southern Turkey, helping allies decide which Syrian opposition fighters across the border will receive arms to fight the Syrian government..."

Free Syrian Army fighters posing for a picture after destroying a government troops carrier on the outskirts of Rastan, a rebel-held city in restive Homs province of central Syria. (photo: AFP/Getty)
Free Syrian Army fighters posing for a picture after destroying a government troops carrier on the outskirts of Rastan, a rebel-held city in restive Homs province of central Syria. (photo: AFP/Getty)



CIA Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition

By Eric Schmitt, The New York Times

21 June 12

 

small number of C.I.A. officers are operating secretly in southern Turkey, helping allies decide which Syrian opposition fighters across the border will receive arms to fight the Syrian government, according to American officials and Arab intelligence officers.

The weapons, including automatic rifles, rocket-propelled grenades, ammunition and some antitank weapons, are being funneled mostly across the Turkish border by way of a shadowy network of intermediaries including Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood and paid for by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the officials said.

The C.I.A. officers have been in southern Turkey for several weeks, in part to help keep weapons out of the hands of fighters allied with Al Qaeda or other terrorist groups, one senior American official said. The Obama administration has said it is not providing arms to the rebels, but it has also acknowledged that Syria’s neighbors would do so.

The clandestine intelligence-gathering effort is the most detailed known instance of the limited American support for the military campaign against the Syrian government. It is also part of Washington’s attempt to increase the pressure on President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, who has recently escalated his government’s deadly crackdown on civilians and the militias battling his rule. With Russia blocking more aggressive steps against the Assad government, the United States and its allies have instead turned to diplomacy and aiding allied efforts to arm the rebels to force Mr. Assad from power.

By helping to vet rebel groups, American intelligence operatives in Turkey hope to learn more about a growing, changing opposition network inside of Syria and to establish new ties. “C.I.A. officers are there and they are trying to make new sources and recruit people,” said one Arab intelligence official who is briefed regularly by American counterparts.

American officials and retired C.I.A. officials said the administration was also weighing additional assistance to rebels, like providing satellite imagery and other detailed intelligence on Syrian troop locations and movements. The administration is also considering whether to help the opposition set up a rudimentary intelligence service. But no decisions have been made on those measures or even more aggressive steps, like sending C.I.A. officers into Syria itself, they said.

The struggle inside Syria has the potential to intensify significantly in coming months as powerful new weapons are flowing to both the Syrian government and opposition fighters. President Obama and his top aides are seeking to pressure Russia to curb arms shipments like attack helicopters to Syria, its main ally in the Middle East.

“We’d like to see arms sales to the Assad regime come to an end, because we believe they’ve demonstrated that they will only use their military against their own civilian population,” Benjamin J. Rhodes, deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, said after Mr. Obama and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir V. Putin, met in Mexico on Monday.

Spokesmen for the White House, State Department and C.I.A. would not comment on any intelligence operations supporting the Syrian rebels, some details of which were reported last week by The Wall Street Journal.

Until now, the public face of the administration’s Syria policy has largely been diplomacy and humanitarian aid.

The State Department said Wednesday that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton would meet with her Russian counterpart, Sergey V. Lavrov, on the sidelines of a meeting of Asia-Pacific foreign ministers in St. Petersburg, Russia, next Thursday. The private talks are likely to focus, at least in part, on the crisis in Syria.

The State Department has authorized $15 million in nonlethal aid, like medical supplies and communications equipment, to civilian opposition groups in Syria.

The Pentagon continues to fine-tune a range of military options, after a request from Mr. Obama in early March for such contingency planning. Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told senators at that time that the options under review included humanitarian airlifts, aerial surveillance of the Syrian military, and the establishment of a no-fly zone.

The military has also drawn up plans for how coalition troops would secure Syria’s sizable stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons if an all-out civil war threatened their security.

But senior administration officials have underscored in recent days that they are not actively considering military options. “Anything at this point vis-à-vis Syria would be hypothetical in the extreme,” General Dempsey told reporters this month.

What has changed since March is an influx of weapons and ammunition to the rebels. The increasingly fierce air and artillery assaults by the government are intended to counter improved coordination, tactics and weaponry among the opposition forces, according to members of the Syrian National Council and other activists.

Last month, these activists said, Turkish Army vehicles delivered antitank weaponry to the border, where it was then smuggled into Syria. Turkey has repeatedly denied it was extending anything other than humanitarian aid to the opposition, mostly via refugee camps near the border. The United States, these activists said, was consulted about these weapons transfers.

American military analysts offered mixed opinions on whether these arms have offset the advantages held by the militarily superior Syrian Army. “The rebels are starting to crack the code on how to take out tanks,” said Joseph Holliday, a former United States Army intelligence officer in Afghanistan who is now a researcher tracking the Free Syrian Army for the Institute for the Study of War in Washington.

But a senior American officer who receives classified intelligence reports from the region, compared the rebels’ arms to “peashooters” against the government’s heavy weaponry and attack helicopters.

The Syrian National Council, the main opposition group in exile, has recently begun trying to organize the scattered, localized units that all fight under the name of the Free Syrian Army into a more cohesive force.

About 10 military coordinating councils in provinces across the country are now sharing tactics and other information. The city of Homs is the notable exception. It lacks such a council because the three main military groups in the city do not get along, national council officials said.

Jeffrey White, a defense analyst at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy who tracks videos and announcements from self-described rebel battalions, said there were now about 100 rebel formations, up from roughly 70 two months ago, ranging in size from a handful of fighters to a couple of hundred combatants.

“When the regime wants to go someplace and puts the right package of forces together, it can do it,” Mr. White said. “But the opposition is raising the cost of those kinds of operations.”

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+1 # bluepilgrim 2012-06-21 16:03
Once again the NYT is a day late and a dollar short -- as seems to be policy.
 
 
+1 # Activista 2012-06-21 21:32
"military options, after a request from Mr. Obama .. included humanitarian airlifts, aerial surveillance of the Syrian military, and the establishment of a no-fly zone...
how coalition troops would secure Syria’s sizable stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons if an all-out civil war threatened their security."
all the lies aka Iraq and Libya are on the table ... Obama and Clinton are war criminals ..
 
 
+1 # John Locke 2012-06-22 06:55
This is part of the "PNAC Model" Murdock is behind the Project which has been heavily promoted by "the Weekly Standard" a republican right wing paper, which it has become apparent now Obama is following their model!
 
 
+3 # Valleyboy 2012-06-22 00:49
Amazing, the US is trying to start a civil war in Syria and the NYT still manages the make them sound like the good guys!
 
 
+2 # RMDC 2012-06-22 02:31
The NYT pretends that if weapons go through Qatar and Saudi Arabia they are not part of US policy. And it forgets the conference called by Hillary to raise funding for the so-called rebels. The conference raised 100 million to pay the salaries of the anti-Assad fighters. That pretty much makes them mercenaries. Whoever pays the salaries calls the shots.

The other thing the NYT ignores is the presence of al Queda in Syria. It has no problem mentioning al Queda in the Arabaian Penninsula or Yemen. This is a case of the CIA working again with al Queda just as it did in Afghanistan.

These proxy or mercenary wars are what the CIA specializes in. It has run these wars in probably 60 or 60 nations since it was created. To call this a "small" operation is just silly. This is an all out CIA proxy war against a sovereign nation. So far we are told that about 14,000 people have been killed. All of these deaths are caused by the CIA started war.

The mercenaries fighting in Syria, Iraq, and other Arab nations have been recruited all over the Arab world and trained in Iraq. The US invaded Afghanistan because of al Queda training bases there but now runs its own al Queda training bases in Iraq. Most Arabs know this. It is reported in the Arab press. As usual, it is the Americans who are clueless because they have weak reporters like Eric Schmitt whose only source for news is USG press releases.
 
 
+3 # RMDC 2012-06-22 03:00
Here is how really bad reporting works --

"Jeffrey White, a defense analyst at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy"

Eric Schmitt does not mention mention that the Washington Institute for Near East Policy was created by AIPAC and is part of the Israel lobby. It distorts middle east news in favor of Israel. Why would Schmitt go to this fake "think tank" for a comment? This shows that Schmitt's whole story is part of the disinformation campaign about the US/Israeli plans for total regime changes in the middle east.

A real reporter would consult better source, someone who actually knows what the CIA and traitor think tanks actually do. White and the WINEP are part of the war effort. They produce the propaganda and Schmitt just retails it in the pages of the NYT.

Of course this is what the NYT has always existed to do. It hires news whores like Schmitt to do whatever some client pays them to do.

This is not journalism. It is new whoring.
 
 
+2 # Activista 2012-06-22 08:03
"coalition troops would secure Syria’s sizable stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons"
all the same pattern - create fortress - apartheid Israel - for end of the year DESTRUCTION of Iran (cold be even nuclear).
At the end of 2012 the "Berlin Wall" around the Israel is built. Israel is ethnically cleansed from Africans ...
Search again:
"A bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives which would prohibit any kind of intervention in Syria, amid widespread calls for military intervention and additional reports of the Obama administration secretly aiding the Syrian rebel fighters.
Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) has introduced ..."
 
 
+2 # bluepilgrim 2012-06-22 22:48
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/jun2012/kurd-j23.shtml
Washington’s hypocrisy over Russian arms in Syria
By Bill Van Auken
23 June 2012

Western denunciations of Russia for sending back refurbished helicopters to Syria recall nothing so much as the old adage, “Do as I say, not as I do.”

Earlier this month, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton launched a propaganda barrage aimed at intimidating Russia, claiming that Moscow was sending advanced Russian attack helicopters to Syria for use against the country’s civilian population. Breathlessly announcing that, according to “the latest information” available to the US government, the helicopters were on their way, Clinton condemned Moscow for behavior that “will escalate the conflict quite dramatically.”
[...]
Washington was forced to back off at least partially from this line of attack when Russia explained that the only helicopters being sent to Syria were nine aircraft purchased from the former Soviet Union in the 1980s that had been sent back to Russia some time ago for repairs and were now being returned. The bulk of these helicopters are designed for transport, and reassembling them once they reach Syria will take months.

Clinton’s claim that the return of the aging helicopters was serving to “escalate the conflict quite dramatically” was quite simply a lie.
[...]
 
 
+1 # Activista 2012-06-23 11:04
"US senator Joe Lieberman, who is actively supporting the Syrian opposition, discussed the issue of FSA salaries during a recent trip to Lebanon and Saudi Arabia"
aka Clinton - US government actively supports TERRORISM. It will come back and brainwashed Americans will ask - why US?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN